Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0035
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/26/2019 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/28/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP19-0035 DP19-0035 1) Add note on plans with a leader line pointing to the retaining wall "Retaining wall design by others under separate permit" 2) Sheet GN-1. Remove all notes that are not applicable to this project 3) Add project # "DP19-0035" to all sheets 4) Engineering can conduct an expedited review once the above comments have been address and a new work flow opened. Please email to schedule John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 03/14/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section Project: DP19-0035 - Commercial Use / Wireless Communication New Mono-palm for Verizon Site Review (1st Review) - Related to T18SE00033 1010 E 9th Street - C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2019 DUE DATE: March 18, 2019 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. Identify major streets within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Section, township, and range, north arrow, and the scale will be labeled. Draw the north arrow next to the location map. 2. COMMENT: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. Revise the sheet index on the cover sheet to list the sheet number i.e., 1 -T-1, 2 - GD-1, 3 -GN-1, 4 - C-1. Revise the sheet numbers in the title block to correctly show the sheet and number of sheets, i.e. 1 of 4 2, of 4 etc. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. List the email addresses for the owner/developer, and all registrants or professionals that assisted in preparing the development package documents. 2. COMMENT: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This Project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP19-0035. List the DP case number, T18SE00033, and T18CM09404 next to the title block of all plan sheets. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 1. COMMENT: Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Revise the Use note as follows: "Commercial Services Use - Wireless Communications Subject to T18SE00033" Existing Site Conditions: 1. COMMENT: Provide site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. Label the Lease Boundary area in distances and bearings. 2. COMMENT: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Label the information for 9th street as noted above. Information on Proposed Development: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. COMMENT: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. On sheet 4, label the zoning classifications of the subject parcel and the zoning classifications adjacent to the subject parcel. 2. COMMENT: Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Label the parking space that is provided for the use. Additional General Comments 1. COMMENT: It is not clear what the standards were listed on the 3rd sheet. The standards include the information, notes, and calculations etc. that are to be added on the DP. The standards are not supposed to be listed on the DP as has been done on the 3rd sheet. Call me for more information on this item. List as a general note, the Special Exception case number, date of approval or authorization and the conditions associated with the special exception approval. Include a sheet that demonstrates the height of the tower such as the sheet that was included on sheet 7 of the Special Application package. If additional sheets are included, assure that the sheet index is revised and the sheet numbers in the title block of all plan sheets are revised. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 03/14/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. List the DP case number DP19-0035,T18SE00033, and T18CM09404 next to the title block of all plan sheets. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Once zoning comments have been addressed, an over the counter review and approval by landscape section can be arranged. |
| 03/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0035 Project Description: SITE/SE - Verizon TUC Cherry, cell tower To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After the necessary corrections have been made, name your documents in the following manner - a 2nd submittal document would be titled: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which review comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected plan set with all documents (the full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Prior to the completion of the next review, we required payment of the assessed fees (or the Review fees at a minimum) Please pay either at the permit counter or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (address is below). Include the Activity Number on your check stub. The fee balance is $817.30 (see the Balance column in the image below). Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |