Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP19-0030
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/21/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/31/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/31/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 06/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: DP19-0030 - Retail Use Group / Auto Rental and Sales Use (Porsche Dealership) Development Package (1st Review) - 4500 E. 22nd Street DP19-0030/Porsche / C-2 Zoning (Demo Exist. Bldg. and Rebuild) TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 4, 2019 DUE DATE: June 19, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 6, 2020. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the information for Karen M. Cesare Landscape Architect. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 2. COMMENT: The Building appears to be proposed over an existing Public Utility Easement recorded in Bk. 7095 at Pg. 421. Zoning cannot approve buildings over any easements without written approval or permissions from the Public Utility Company/Companies that hold an interest in the easement. Any approval or permission must be in writing on the Utility company letter head. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 3. COMMENT: Revise the parking calculations to show the required and provided parking as a whole. Remove any information related to employee parking unless it is excess parking proposed for employees only. The plan shall clearly depict the required parking spaces including the ADA spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 4. COMMENT: Include a dimensioned detail drawing of the current long term bicycle parking facility. Draw on the plan the location of the facilities. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 5. COMMENT: A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where the buildings are located. A Minimum four foot sidewalk is required adjacent to the east, south and west sides of the new building. The sidewalks must be physically separated from the drive lanes / PAAL's. Demonstrate the onsite pedestrian connection to the adjacent facility. The proposed pedestrian walkway from the building to the ADA parking space is within the PAAL system. This location is unsafe and must be relocated and physically separated from the PAAL / Drive lanes. A redesign of this pedestrian way is required. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 6. COMMENT: Add a general note about the type of mailbox location or type whether to be delivered to the Porsche building or is there an existing gang mailbox etc. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 7. COMMENT: Add a general note that all new signage will be permitted under separate permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday, or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/11/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Street Landscape Borders Located on Site Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Obtain permission from TDOT for use of ROW Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/11/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. The fee balance is $0 (zero). Activity Number: DP19-0030 Project Description: SITE/FLOODPLAIN- Chapman Volkswagen of Tucson - sidewalks, pavement, overhead structure. For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, please name your 4th submittal documents accordingly, for example: 4_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes made to the Plan and which reviewer comments you are responding to) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The Project Manager can be contacted at: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4927 Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/11/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |