Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP19-0030
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/20/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/06/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/07/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Chapman Volkswagen of Tucson - Retail/Vehicle Rental and Sales Use Development Package (1st Review) 4500 E. 22nd Street DP19-0030 - C-2 Zoning - 644 S.F. Expansion TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2019 DUE DATE: March 11, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 6, 2020. 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 1. COMMENT: After discussion with Steve Shields, Review Section Manager, the Aerials must be removed and replaced with the site plan drawing. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0030, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 3. COMMENT: Label on the location map the Columbus BL and Belvedere Av. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. COMMENT: The use as listed in the UDC is Vehicle Rental and Sales subject to UDC Section 4.9.9.G.1 and .2. Revise the use note. Clarify if what is meant by "Repair"? Is this a separate principal use or should it be revised to state accessory use to the Vehicle Rental and Sales Use? 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 5. COMMENT: Indicate if there are any existing easements within the area for the proposed new building? 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 6. COMMENT: Will this area be only for the employees? If not, sidewalks adjacent to the building will be required and must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas. (If "employee access" only is proposed for this area, add a keynote as such. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/07/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments. |
| 03/11/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide a site drawing that includes the following existing utility information: a. The location and size of water lines, and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The points of connection to existing public sewers. d. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. e. Any existing or proposed utility easements f. The first floor elevation for the buildings Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 03/18/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | FUP not required. Study supporting LOMR shows FP contained in the channel. |
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP19-0030 Project Description: SITE/FLOODPLAIN- Chapman Volkswagon of Tucson - sidewalks, pavement, overhead structure. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After the necessary corrections have been made, name your documents accordingly - a 2nd submittal document would be titled: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which review comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected plan set with all documents (the full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). The Project Manager can be reached via email: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4927. Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |