Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP19-0012
Parcel: 129042440

Address:
302 S PLUMER AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP19-0012
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/22/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
01/24/2019 MASHFOR1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
02/20/2019 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP19-0012
Board of Adjustment variances are under application for this project. Additional comments may be forthcoming once the variance process is complete.
1. Maneuvering into and out of parking spaces must be completed on site.
2. Solid waste enclosure, gates and approach pad must be on site.
3. Show dimensions for sidewalk within the right-of-way. Sidewalk less than four feet wide must be replaced with 5-foot sidewalks.
02/20/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
The development plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
c. Board of Adjustment case; and any conditions imposed.

Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of Board of Adjustment case.

Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.
No landscape plan was submitted.
7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING

7.6.2. APPLICABILITY

The provisions of this section apply to the following:

A. All new development; and,

B. Expansion of existing development, as provided below:

Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less

On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows.

a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.

b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site.

If expansion is greater than 50% the following applies:


Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas

a. General Standards

Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof.
(1) The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).

(2) Fifty percent of the trees required for landscape borders located within ten feet of the paved portion(s) of a vehicular use area may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree standard and the landscape border canopy tree standard.

(3) An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.

Street Landscape Borders

To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards:

a. Minimum Width
Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line.

One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points.

Vegetative Ground Cover

Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting.

7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS
The purpose of screening is to provide visual barriers, noise reduction, and to provide privacy.

When Required

Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

A 30" screen is required along street frontages within the required street landscape buffer.

Ensure that Zone and Engineering comments are addressed.
02/20/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. If the existing 5/8" water meter (#14429124) is to remain, will it be adequate to meet the proposed water demand for both the existing and the proposed building?
2. Revise the site drawing to show the point of connection for the building sewer. Reference Section 107.2.1, IBC 2018.
3. Revise the site drawing to include the location, invert and rim elevations of the upstream manhole, along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation or is less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 714.1, IPC 8 as amended by the City of Tucson.
02/21/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
02/21/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
Activity Number: DP19-0012
Project Description: SITE/BOA - SIT STAY PLAY: PARTIAL DEMO, NEW BLDG, RENOV, SITE WORK
To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made, submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. Enter the Activity Number in the Project Description field and name the file as directed, for example, second submittal: 2_Plan_Set.pdf. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle.­
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set with all documents
3) Items requested by review staff
Please pay the assessed fees at the permit counter or mail a check (payable to City of Tucson – address is shown below) prior to the completion of the next review. Include the Activity Number on your check stub. The fee balance is $ 1124.00.
Loren Makus, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4927. Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
02/21/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Sit, Stay, Play - Commercial Use Group / Animal Services
Development Package (1st Review) 302 S. Plumer Avenue
DP19-0012 - I-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2019
DUE DATE: February 20, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 18, 2020.


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: The sheet index shall include the sheet number i.e., 1 - DP1, 2 - DP2. Revise the index as required.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

3. COMMENT: List the name of the project in the title block.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP19-0012, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.
2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

5. COMMENT: Label Kino Parkway and Tucson Boulevard on the location map.


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

6. COMMENT: Correct general note 1, the acreage to .51 acres.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: Include the Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.Q in general note 3.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

8. COMMENT: This site is within the Davis Monthan Airport AEZ overlay area, specifically within the NCD-A overlay. Include a general note that states that this development has been designed to comply with the UDC regulations of the AEZ Section 5.6. (Review UDC Section 5.6.9 for specifics related to this project).


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

9. COMMENT: Based on review of the current aerial it does not appear that the existing building to be removed has drawn accurately. Revise the existing building to match what currently exists.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

10. COMMENT: This use does not have a lot coverage requirement. The lot coverage calculations is not required.


2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

11. COMMENT: Include an expansion calculation.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

12. COMMENT: Include all the information for 13th St. and Plumer Av. on the site plan as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

13. COMMENT: Draw and label the sight visibility triangles.


2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

14. COMMENT: Vehicle parking is shown with the existing pedestrian area along 13 St. The vehicle parking spaces will have to be removed from the right of way and located on site. Compliance with the UDC section 74.6 must be demonstrated on the plans.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

15. COMMENT: Label 13 St. and Plumer Av. As (PUBLIC). Include the additional information for the curbs, sidewalks, widths etc. as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

16. COMMENT: See related comment 14.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Dimension the existing vehicle parking spaces. As noted above in comment 14, required vehicle parking spaces may not be located within the public right of way. The site should be designed to provide the required parking on site. The current vehicle parking spaces create a hazard for pedestrians and traffic in the area.


2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

18. COMMENT: If the vehicle parking spaces are to remain as proposed a variance approval through a board of adjustment process will be required.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

19. COMMENT: The bicycle parking calculation used for this use is incorrect. The Animal Service use is not required to provide short or long term bicycle parking facilities. Revise the calculation as noted in table 7.4.8-1 Animal Service use. If proposing short term facilities as noted on the plan the facilities must be located on site.




2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

20. COMMENT: Revise the building setback note for the north boundary to state "side street" setback. This setback must be a minimum of 10 feet.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

21. COMMENT: Demonstrate onsite pedestrian circulation.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

22. COMMENT: If applicable indicate the locations of any proposed freestanding signage.


23. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that this is an existing site. It appears that an B of A application C10-19-07 for multiple variance requests has been made. The site plan submitted for review for the B of A process does not match the site in this DP. Clarify which DP will be used for the B of A and for permitting?

Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the findings through the B of A process. If applicable make any necessary changes to the DP based on conditions of the B of A approval.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/21/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed