Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0302
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2019 | ACONNOR1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/18/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Development Plan will contain the following: Rezoning case and any conditions imposed Indicate graphically where possible the conditions of Re-zoning Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. |
| 03/19/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/19/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Foothills Storage - Commercial Use / Personal Storage Development Package (2nd Review) Related to C9-18-05 DP18-0302 - Proposed Zoning is C-2 4068 E. Fort Lowell Road TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 19, 2019 DUE DATE: March 19, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 13, 2019. ****Please address only the "Follow up Comments" listed. The previous comments or portions thereof have been left as reference. 1. Follow up to previous comment 5: There are 2 project directories in this package. The directory on 2 appears to be a complete directory with all the information required by the standard. It is suggested that the directory on sheet 2 be moved to sheet 1. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. Previous comment 5: Relocate the project directory information to the cover sheet. List Robert W. Kubicek's information on the cover sheet. 2. Follow up to previous comment 6: Revise the sheet numbers in the title block. Sheets 2 and 3 are missing the sheet numbers and number of sheets, sheets 9 through 15 are numbered incorrectly. Revise as required. Revise the information in the small title block so it can be read from left to right. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet 1 of 11, 2 of 11, 3 of 11 etc). Previous Comment 6: Add to the title block on all plan sheets the information as noted in the tandards above 2-06.4.2 through 2-06.4.2.D 3. Follow up to previous comment 9: Label Glenn Street on the location map. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, Previous comment 9: Revise the location map on the cover sheet as noted by the standards above, 2-06.4.4 through 2-06.4.4.C. 4. Follow up to previous comment 10: Revise general note 21 as follows: "The existing zoning is MH-1 and R-3, the proposed Zoning is C-2" (revise the rezoning case number to C9-18-05, no dash between the C and the 9) Revise the note 'Development Package Approval Conditions' to "Rezoning Conditions per C9-18-05" 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. Previous comment 10: List as a general note the proposed zoning and rezoning case number and list the conditions of rezoning. 5. Follow up to previous comment 11: Remove the words "APPLICABLE USES OCR-1, OCR-2:" from general note 2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. Previous comment 11: Revise General note 2 to include the proposed use is for "Personal Storage" and list the applicable Use Specific Standards listed in Table 4.8.4. 6. Follow up to previous comment 12: Add a general note that states that "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R Setbacks per UDC section 5.4". 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. Previous comment 11: Fort Lowell Road is list as a major street and route on the Adopted MS&R map. The future right of way for Fort Lowell road in this area is a total of 100 feet per the MS&R map. Clarify when the dedication of right of way is to occur? Contact TDOT for dedication process and requirements. 7. Follow up to previous comment 13: On sheet 2 under the Site Data information, revise the existing zoning classifications to MH-1 and R-3. Revise the use note to "Personal Storage". 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. Previous comment 13: Revise the lot area calculations to be specific as it relates to the rezoning site and the storage site. While the rezoning includes a commercial component the storage area is a stand-alone site and the calculations should be based on the storage site only. Under the site data text block revise the site area calculations. 8. Follow up to previous comment 18: The zoning classifications have not been labeled as requested. Verify the zoning classifications on PDSD GIS map and label the classifications as requested. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. Previous comment 18: Label the zoning classifications on the site plan sheet as noted by the standard above. 9. Follow up to previous comment 20: I don't believe the SVT's were drawn correctly. Contact the PDSD Engineering reviewer for the correct placement of the sight triangles. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. Previous comment 20: Draw and label the current and future sight visibility triangles. 10. Follow up to previous comment 22: Clarify if both ADA parking spaces are 11 feet wide, (dimension both spaces)? 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous comment 22: Add dimensioned details drawing for the standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces as noted by the standard above. 11. Follow up to previous comment 24: The short term facility included in the plans is not one of the acceptable facilities. Also the detail must include the dimensioned area of the facility location or a separate dimensioned detail drawing can be added with the design dimensions based on the proposed location. Indicate the type of surfacing for the facility. Review UDC section 7.4.9 figures 7.4.9.B and 7.4.9.C 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Previous comment 24: Include a dimensioned detail drawing of the short term facility type specific to the proposed location on the site. 12. Follow up to previous comment 28: The future curb location was not dimensioned as requested in a previous comment. The street building setback along Fort Lowell Road is to be dimensioned from the back of the future curb location. Contact TDOT to verify where the future curb would be located from the future property line. Dimension the building setback accordingly. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Previous comment 28: Building A: Label the street perimeter building setback based on the existing and future back of curb location. Label the building setback from the east property line. 13. Follow up to previous comment 32: The requested document stating how all rezoning conditions have been addressed was not included as requested. Include a written response memo detailing how the conditions of rezoning have been addressed. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Previous comment 32: Include with the next DP submittal a separate document that states how the rezoning conditions have been or will be addressed whether on the DP or upon development. (It is acknowledged that not all rezoning conditions apply to the Storage use.) 14. Follow up to previous comment 35: Please include a copy of the memo from John Beall on the next submittal of the DP. Previous comment 35: After a discussion with John Beall Rezoning Section Manager, the applicant must request a letter of determination regarding the change in PDP. While the site plan in the DP does not match the PDP the changes appear to be minor but must be approved through John Beall. Contact John Beal at 520-837-6966 or John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov . If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/20/2019 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP18-0302, Foothills Storage /2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman, Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone Ave, 4th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 03/20/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/20/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | March 20, 2019 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0302 PROJECT NAME: Foothills Storage PROJECT ADDRESS: 4068 E Ft Lowell PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package. 1. Improvements within the right of way must be shown on plan. Show Driveway, 6 foot Sidewalk, curb access ramps. Unused curb cuts to be closed, dimensions and refer to PAG Standards details. 2. Show grades within right of way for constructability. |
| 03/22/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0302 1) Follow up on previous comment 1. Check the sheet numbering in the bottom right for all sheets. Update to match sheet index 2) Confirm all basin side slopes and depth. If any proposed basin depth is over 2' and the side slope of the basin is greater than 4:1. Per COT Storm Water Detention/Retention Manual, pages 81,82, a minimum 42" tall security barrier is required. The barrier should be placed to prevent access. Provide barrier detail. Suggest using PAG standard detail 105, see following link http://apps.pagnet.org/StandardSpecifications/Documents/Drawings/PAGStdDtl-105.pdf 3) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3 4) Previous comment 6. The drainage report still mentions a 36hr drawdown time. Please update the drainage report to confirm that a 12hr drawdown time is being achieved 5) Sheet 6, ADA parking detail. This detail appears to only provide 1.5' of vehicle overhang passed the curb. The minimum overhang should be 2.5'. Please update detail to show a 2.5' overhang and also show that a minimum 4' wide sidewalk/pedestrian area is being maintained 6) The pedestrian circulation connection to BLDG 3. Show how the path connects to the elevated sidewalk at the northeast corner of the building. It appears that a curb access ramp is needed 7) Previous comment 20. What is provided on plans is the table which shows the annual Waste generated per square foot for a proposed use. Provide calculations, based on the building area that the waste generated can be accommodated by the proposed service. An example calculation is provided in TSM section 8-01.8 for reference 8) Previous comment 10. Sheet P-1 landscape note 12. Screened Granite Mulch is decomposed/decomposing granite. Update ground cover to be decorative rock or other product that does not silt and reduce infiltration 9) Previous comment 11. Please provide a copy of the SWPPP manual upon next submittal John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 03/26/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP18-0302 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - Foothills Storage. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After the necessary corrections have been made, name your documents accordingly - a 2nd submittal document would be titled: 2_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which reviewer comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). The Project Manager can be reached via email: Nicholas.Ross@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4029. Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/26/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |