Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0298
Parcel: 14042077D

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0298
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/14/2019 SBEASLE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Reqs Change January 14, 2019

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0298 Hilton Home2, 1st Submittal, Received December 20, 2018

Dear Ms. Beasley,
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0298, Hilton Home2; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 2.53 acre site, located southeast of the intersection of South Bay Colony Drive and East Valencia Road. The property is zoned Park Industrial (P-I) and Industrial 1 (I-1), with the proposed development being a new hotel.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, FAA Part 77 airspace, and the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone.

The Tucson Airport Authority is denying approval of the 1st submittal of the project. The following issues have been identified:
1) The zoning for this project is inconsistent. The plan set indicates the site zoning is only P-I but MapTucson and the project application indicate the site zoning are P-I and I-1.
2) This project is contained within the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone; this needs to be documented on the plan set.
3) Update the plan set to show this project is contained within the Airport Hazard District for the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone for Tucson International Airport.
4) The plan set and project application reference different project scopes. The plan set indicates that this project is proposed to be 14 floors but the project application indicates this project will be 4 floors.
5) Update the plan set to document what the proposed total height of the structure will be from finish floor elevation.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,
Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner
01/16/2019 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2602.23) is higher than the first floor elevation (2601.00). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
01/22/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-10.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

Calculations
a. Square footage of the site;
b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation;
c. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees;
d. A shadow pattern and calculation are required in certain cases (see Section 7.6.4.B, Vehicular Use Area, of the UDC). Provide these, if applicable;
e. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas;
f. Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length; and,
g. Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage, when applicable.

7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS

The purpose of screening is to provide visual barriers, noise reduction, and to provide privacy.

A. When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

A 30" screen is required along street frontages.

Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).


7.7.4. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND STANDARDS

Submittal Requirements

A Native Plant Preservation Plan in accordance with Section 2-12.0.0 of the Administrative Manual is required for all projects under the applicability of this section according to the methodology selected by the applicant as outlined in Section 7.7.5, Plant Preservation Standards.

Submit NPP plan or application for exception per SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS.

SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING

Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

Provide a separate Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand.

Provide water budget data, along with the background data and assumptions used to develop it.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
01/22/2019 MASHFOR1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved 903.2.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area.

907.2.8 Group R-1. Fire Alarm systems and smoke alarms shall be installed in Group R-1 occupancies as required in Sections 907.2.8.1 through 907.2.8.3
01/23/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments- additional comments related to site accessibility may be forthcoming based on the re-submittal of the DP.
01/23/2019 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Hilton Home 2 Tucson - Travelers Accommodation Lodging (Commercial Use)
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0298 - 6555 S. Bay Colony Drive P-I / I-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 22, 2019
DUE DATE: January 22, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 11, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

*** The plan submitted for review does not appear to have been drawn to comply with the Administrative Manual 2-06. The information included in this plan appears to be designed to demonstrate a private improvement for TDOT and Tucson Water Department. The following zoning comments are based on the submitted document for review. Please address all zoning comments on the plans and review and address all Development Package reviewers' comments.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS
2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: The title block provided in the lower right corner appears to be the title used for the TDOT and Tucson Water Department drawings. The following is a typical title block used on DP plans. While it is acknowledged that all firms have or use their own individual title block, the one below includes the common information in the standards. If the title block used on the DP package can be modified to include the information required by the standards in AM 2-06 feel free to do so or modify it to the typical title block below.




2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: All sheets shall include a 3 inch by 5 inch area next to the title block reserved for a PDSD Digital Stamp to be applied by PDSD staff once the DP is approved.


2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

3. COMMENT: The project location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet and include the information listed in the standards 2-06.4.4 through 2-06.4.4.C. (The location map is only required on the cover sheet but if it is to be included on the site sheets, assure that the locations maps match the location map on the cover sheet.


2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Label the contour interval used on the grading plan sheets.


2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

5. COMMENT: Include all symbols and line work used on the site plan sheet other than grading symbols and line work.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

6. COMMENT: On the sheet index listed on the cover sheet, include the sheet number, i.e. 1 - C-1, 2 - C-2 etc. Additional sheets will probably be required to be included in the DP package such as Site Plan sheet(s) detailing compliance with zoning / engineering, technical standards requirements and Landscape and Native Plant Preservation Plan detailing compliance with the landscape and NPPO regulations. Revise the sheet index as required.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

7. COMMENT: List the email address and contact name for the Owner/developer. List on the cover sheet the information for any additional registrants that may assist in the preparation of the additional documents as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

8. COMMENT: Remove the words "improvement plans" from the title block of all plans sheets. List only the name of the project.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

9. COMMENT: Include a brief legal description of the subject parcel. The brief legal description will be based on the lot split.

As part of the review of the project it is apparent that a lot split is either proposed or has been done. Zoning could not verify approval of a lot split through the PDSD review and approval process and subsequent recordation of the said lot split. If the lot split is proposed contact Alexandra Hines (520-837-6975 for the application, review and approval process related to a lot split. If the lot has been split without benefit of PDSD review and approval contact Steve Shields Section Review Manager for information on what is required for submittal. The DP cannot be approved until the lot split process is completed through PDSD.


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

10. COMMENT: Assure that the sheet numbers and sheet total is revised accordingly in the title block of plan sheets.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

11. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0298, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List the administrative address next to the title block of all plan sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

12. COMMENT: Draw the location map in the upper right corner of the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. The map shall be drawn at a scale of 3 inches equals one mile and the scale labeled as such.

Label the following information under the location map, "In the N.E. ¼ of Section 17, T.15S, R14E, G. &S.R.M., City of Tucson, Pima County, Arizona". Label the map as "Location Map" and list the scale as "3" = 1 Mile".

2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

13. COMMENT: Show the site on the map as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

14. COMMENT: The street names labeled on the location map are correct and are within the one mile area depicted on the location map.

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

15. COMMENT: Label the section corners based on the location map drawn on the cover sheet. Valencia Road and Country Club Road is the Section corner intersection. The section corners 8, 9, 16, 17 shall be listed on the location map.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.
2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes: The following information shall be listed under a text block labeled as Zoning Data, Zoning Development Criteria, Zoning Information etc. The zoning information shall be placed on the cover sheet. (It is noted that some of the information is listed on the cover sheet under site information but is incomplete.)

2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

16. COMMENT: Add the following as a general note or as noted above, "The existing zoning of the property is P-I and I-1".

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

17. COMMENT: List as a general note the site area in square footage and acreage as note by the standard above.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

18. COMMENT: List as a general note the existing use as "Vacant" and the proposed use as "Commercial Use Group: Travelers Accommodation Lodging; Subject to UDC Use Specific Standards 4.9.13.Q in the I-1 Zone". If Alcoholic Beverage is proposed as an accessory use list the following "Commercial Use Group: Travelers Accommodation Lodging; with Alcoholic Beverage as an accessory use Subject to UDC Use Specific Standards 4.9.4V.1 &.2 and 4.9.4.C.3 in the P-I and I-1 Zones".


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

19. COMMENT: This site fronts along Valencia Road to the north. Valencia Road is a listed as a major arterial road on the M & C adopted Major Streets and Routes Map. Add a general note that states that "This site has been designed to comply with UDC Section 5.4, future MS&R building setback".

As of this review it does not appear that the site complies with the future right of way requirements. Until a complete site plan and landscape plan is submitted for review it is not clear the use of the future right of way has been addressed. Any use of the future right of way has to be clearly depicted whether it is for landscaping water harvesting, landscaping etc. or the site plan shall be designed with the future right of way requirements fully detailed on the zoning and landscape site plan sheets.

The parcel is also within the within the Tucson International Airport Environs Zone Overlay. The parcel is within the AEZ height zones of 75 to 84. The overall height of the proposed development will have to be verified based on the MSL elevations of the subject site design grade elevation and the applicable MSL at the end of the NE runway 21 2569.3. The maximum height that the building can be on the subject site is 75 to 84 feet above the MSL of the end of runway 21. (If needed, additional information related to the applicable runway which will affect this site can be obtained from Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority.) Include a height calculation using the MSL of the site at design grade, maximum overall height of the proposed building and the established MSL of the applicable end of runway that demonstrates compliance.

Keep in mind that the overall maximum height listed in the UDC Section 6.3.5 table 6.3.5-A, for P-I zone is 50 feet and 75 feet in the I-1 zone. The proposed building height was not listed on the plans. Assuming that there are only 4 floors and not 14 as listed under the Site Information text block, and that four floors is what will be constructed at 9 to 10 feet per floor this would be a maximum 40 to 50 feet. (List under the Site Information text block the proposed height as measured from design grade and allowed under UDC section 6.4.4. and to the top of any additional feature above the allowed height.)

Assuming that the site is in compliance with the regulations of the TIA AEZ Height Zones, add a General note that states; "This project has been designed to comply with the UDC Section 5.6, TIA AEZ Height Zones Regulations".

In addition, this area is within the Airport Avigation easement. A review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner is required. Contact Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 or Phone 520-573-8100, Direct line 520-573-4811 or srobidoux@flytucson.com for more information on the Avigation easement requirements.


2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

20. COMMENT: As noted above, a lot split application review and approval will be required prior to approval of the DP. When the lot split application is made, a subdivision case number will be assigned to the project. List as reference the assigned subdivision case number in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

21. COMMENT: List the overall building square footage based on all floors and any detached enclosed structures.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

22. COMMENT: There is no lot coverage requirement for this type of use. The coverage calculation can be removed.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

23. COMMENT: Draw the information for existing conditions adjacent to the subject site and across the abutting streets, as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

24. COMMENT: The site boundary cannot be verified until a copy of the PDSD approved and Pima County recorded lot split / survey drawing is provided.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

25. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above for Valencia Road and Bay Colony Drive as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

26. COMMENT: Same as comment 24 above. Site information to be verified against the PDSD approved and Pima County recorded lot split / survey drawing.


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

27. COMMENT: Same as comment 24 and 26 above. Site information to be verified against the PDSD approved Pima County recorded lot split / survey drawing.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

28. COMMENT: Label the zoning classification adjacent to the subject site including the zoning classification across both abutting streets.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

29. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label the SVTs as Noted by the standard above; see the PDSD Engineering Reviewer comments related to SVTs.


2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

30. COMMENT: To be verified on the next submittal of the revised DP.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

31. COMMENT: Label Valencia Road as a Public Street and Bay Colony Drive as a Private Street.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

32. COMMENT: To be verified on the next submittal of the revised DP.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

33. COMMENT: Provide the vehicle parking calculations, parking details, dimensions etc. as noted by the standard above. To be verified on the next submittal of the revised DP.

Additional comments may be forthcoming on the next submittal related to vehicle use areas, dimensions, Porte Cochere structures, etc.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

34. COMMENT: Bicycle parking requirements, detail drawings, facility locations, calculations etc. as noted by the standard above will be verified on the next submittal of the DP.


2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

35. COMMENT: Draw the information for Valencia Road as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

36. COMMENT: Any proposed easements will be verified against the PDSD approved and Pima County recorded lot split / survey drawing.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

37. COMMENT: Label the building setbacks from the current and future back of curb location along Valencia Road and Bay Colony Drive.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

38. COMMENT: Label the square footage and building height within the building footprint.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

39. COMMENT: Label the width of all on site sidewalks. At sidewalk locations where they abut vehicle parking spaces the width must be a minimum of six and one half feet wide if the vehicle parking spaces are not designed with wheel stops.

All sidewalks must be designed to with a maximum of 2% cross slope and 5% longitudinal slope. Label the proposed cross and longitudinal slopes for all sidewalk locations.

A sidewalk connection from the building or onsite sidewalk system must be provided out to the Valencia Road street sidewalk unless there is barrier such as a drainage-way or an unbroken security fence, (e.g., a wall or fence)


2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

40. COMMENT: As noted by the standard above, provide the pedestrian information for both streets fronting the subject site.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

41. COMMENT: Add a note stating that mail will be provided inside the building.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

42. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label the location, type and size of any proposed free-standing monument sign(s).


43. COMMENT: Be aware that the zoning review was done based on the submitted drawings which were not designed to comply with Administrative Manual Standards 2-06. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the review of the re-submittal of the DP.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
01/28/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0298

1) Provide a different title block that does not reference the City of Tucson or the Department of Transportation or Tucson Water as being the project owner
2) The engineering seal on the drainage report is illegible. Correct as needed
3) Provide in plans all pipe drainage inlet/outlet details including necessary erosion control features
4) Show the developed condition 100 year flood plain limits
5) Show graphically in the drainage report the pre-development and post development drainage patterns
6) Include an assessment of any downstream impacts of rerouting the existing flow pattern along the southern property line. Show no adverse impact
7) Show on plans the Q100 flow rate expected through the southern channel. Provide any necessary erosion protection in the channel
8) PDF page 13 of the drainage report shows a 36" x 24" concrete pipe. Where is this pipe located?
9) Expand the drainage report to mention the proposed underground storm drain system. Include calculations showing that the correct pipe diameter is specified
10) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3
11) Sheet 1; Drainage Notes 3, indicates that an elevation certificate is needed for the finished floor elevations. It is not clear if the plan is to modify the existing drainage pattern or if the building finished floor will be elevated 1' above the 100 year WSEL
12) Ensure that roof drains scupper underneath sidewalks. Reference COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.E
13) Show how the proposed plan is in compliance with COT Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C. Particularly the grading of the vehicular use areas should be in such a manner that runoff is directed into landscaped areas. Curb cuts should be provided at optimal locations to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas. Available landscape area should be depressed up to 6" to maximize water harvesting. Provide spot grades in all depressed landscaped areas. Adjust parking area grading such that tributary area is provided to landscaped areas
14) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each proposed basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future
15) Project site is greater than one acre. Provide a storm water pollution prevention plan and manual
16) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8-01.8.0
17) Provide a trash enclosure detail to meet TSM section 8. Show on plans the required maneuvering area
18) Provide the dimensions for all parking area access lanes
19) Provide dimensions, including cross slope and running slope for all existing and proposed sidewalks
20) Add a note indicating that the curb access ramp at the northwest corner intersection of S Bay Colony Dr and E Valencia Rd will be updated to current PAG standard detail 207
21) Per TSM section 10-01.3.2.C, At the intersections of streets with other streets or collector or arterial streets with PAALs/Driveways, the curb lines will be connected with a curve having the minimum radius shown in Figure 6, measured at the face of the curb. Show the radius for the proposed curb return connecting to S Bay Colony Dr
22) Additional comments may apply

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
01/28/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice
Activity Number: DP18-0298
Project Description: E SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - HILTON HOME2

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made, submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
Please enter the Activity Number in the Project Description field and name the file as directed, for example, second submittal: 2_Plan_Set.pdf.
The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle.­
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set with all documents
3) Items requested by review staff
The current fee balance is $ 82.50 (see image below). Review fees must be paid prior to the second submittal review. Please include the Activity Number on your check stub.
Loren Makus, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4927. Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
12/20/2018 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/28/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed