Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0277
Parcel: 136254100

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0277
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/19/2018 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/20/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
12/06/2018 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change **ATTACHMENT CAN BE VIEWED IN DOCUMENTS TABLE IN PRO**

12/06/18
DP18-0277, Esperanza en Escalante/1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing's comments. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,

Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV - 4th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
12/13/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Provide the development package case number, DP18-0277, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.
This site was approved under a Special Exception. List the SE case number in the lower right corner of the sheets and list the SE conditions of approval. Include a separate memo stating how the conditions of approval have been addressed. If a request to PDSD for a change to the original PDP. Include a copy of the revised PDP and the approval memo from PDSD Staff.
Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
12/13/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
12/13/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Esperanza en Escalante Phase II - Residential Care Services Use
Development Package (1st Review) - 3700 S Calle Polar
DP18-0277 - RX-1 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2018
DUE DATE: December 13, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 13, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from sheets 11-22. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff.



2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0277, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

This site was approved under a Special Exception. List the SE case number in the lower right corner of the sheets and list the SE conditions of approval. Include a separate memo stating how the conditions of approval have been addressed. It is my understanding that there was a request to PDSD for a change to the original PDP. Include a copy of the revised PDP and the approval memo from PDSD Staff.


2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

3. COMMENT: Label Stella Road in the Location Map.


2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

4. COMMENT: This site has gone through a Special Exception Zoning Examiner review and approval process for an unlimited number of clients. List the case number as a general note and the list the conditions of the Special Exception. (See related comment 2)

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

5. COMMENT: List in General Note 3 that the use is subject to a Special Exception.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

6. COMMENT: Add the information related to the Special Exception.


2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

7. COMMENT: List as reference next to the title block, the lot split case number associated with this parcel. As of this review, the lot split application S18-101 has not been reviewed or approved. The DP cannot be approved until the Lot split has been reviewed and approved by PDSD staff and recorded by the Pima County Recorder's Office.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

8. COMMENT: List the lot coverage calculation based on the GFA and vehicle use areas.


2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

9. COMMENT: Additional comments may forthcoming on the standard above based on the changes to the PDP.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

10. COMMENT: This development functions as one site. List the information as noted by the standard above.

Provide the documentation related to cross access. The proposed lot division does not provide direct access to Calle Polar therefore a recorded ingress/egress easement or cross access agreement is required. Provide the documentation with the next submittal and draw and label the easement or list the Cross Access Easement as a general note with recording information.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

11. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above, specifically ingress / egress.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

12. COMMENT: The information related to the new lot lines will be verified with the approved Lot split application survey drawing. Include a copy of the lot split documents with the next submittal.


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

13. COMMENT: Has not been verified.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

14. COMMENT: Zoning could only verify 57 vehicle parking spaces. Verify the number of spaces and revise the drawing or vehicle parking count.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

15. COMMENT: It is suggested by Zoning that one of the Short term bicycle racks be relocated midway between the north and south units.

Correct keynote 22 on sheets 3 and 4 to state the correct sheet for the location of the short term bicycle parking facilities details.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

16. COMMENT: Label the building setbacks from the east side of the new buildings to the new interior property line.

Per Use Specific Standard 4.9.7.J.7, the minimum building setback from interior lot line adjoining residential zoning shall be 25 feet. Revise the building setbacks listed on the cover sheet from 20 feet to 25 feet.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

17. COMMENT: It is suggested by zoning that a pedestrian connection be made from the new east side pedestrian sidewalk to the west pedestrian sidewalk.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

18. COMMENT: Label the Community Building and draw and label the Mailboxes location.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
12/14/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Clarify the purpose of calling for cleanouts in an 8" sanitary sewer that has manholes. Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012.
12/17/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0277

1) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each proposed basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future
2) Reference City of Tucson (C0T) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3
3) Drainage report indicates that the proposed detention basin will have 4:1 side slopes. The plans show a 3:1 side slope. Correct as needed
4) Proposed Basin Depth is over 2' and the side slope of the basin is greater than 4:1. Per COT Storm Water Detention/Retention Manual, pages 81,82, a minimum 42" tall security barrier is required. The barrier should be placed to prevent access. For example where a sidewalk runs adjacent to a basin. Provide barrier detail. Suggest using PAG standard detail 105, see following link http://apps.pagnet.org/StandardSpecifications/Documents/Drawings/PAGStdDtl-105.pdf
5) Add "DP18-0277" to both the drainage report and plan set. Remove the Development package stamp from the landscape sheets
6) Provide proposed drawdown time for the detention basin
7) Provide connection details for proposed storm drain system. How the pipes connect to each other at turns and how they connect to the proposed catch basins
8) Provide details for the proposed out detention basin outlet structure
9) Show how the proposed plan is in compliance with COT Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C. Particularly the grading of the vehicular use areas should be in such a manner that runoff is directed into landscaped areas. Curb cuts should be provided at optimal locations to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas. Available landscape area should be depressed up to 6" to maximize water harvesting
10) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to show the effective ponding depth is maintained. Include spot grades adjacent to all scuppers crossing from landscaped areas into to paved areas
11) Sheet 13. Trash enclosure to the top left is shown as being half covered by a tree. This is interfering with the vertical clear area per COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8. Adjust tree location as needed

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
12/18/2018 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0277
Project Description: E SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - ESPERANZA EN ESCALANTE - PHASE II

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number.
(If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. Submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
The plans will then re-enter the 20-working-day review cycle.
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set with all documents
3) Items requested by review staff
The current fee balance is $0 (zero).
Nicholas Ross, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: (520) 837-4029.Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Svcs. Dept.
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/18/2018 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed