Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0276
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11/19/2018 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
11/19/2018 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Addressing does not want to review. |
11/20/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please add proposed occupancy classification to plans. Also, unable to determine if this is a stand alone building or ties into existing building on Main Ave. If combined, thresholds for sprinklers may be reached. Is it the intent to furnish fire sprinklers? |
12/10/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Explain how new roof drain will discharge. Ensure that pedestrian routes will be kept flood free for up to a 10-year event. 2. Clarify whether an existing loading zone is indicated north of Building 4. 3. Aerial photos and street views show an existing solid waste container between buildings 2 and 4. Clearly show on the plans where the solid waste container will be located. 4. Provide a diagram showing accessible routes throughout the site. |
12/11/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
12/11/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tucson Museum of Art - Kasser Family Gallery - Cultural Use Development Package (1st Review) - 120 N. Main Avenue DP18-0276 - HC-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 11, 2018 DUE DATE: December 13, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 13, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0276, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2. COMMENT: Label on the following street names on the location map; 6th Avenue, St. Mary's Road, Stone Avenue, Church Avenue. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Provide copies of the Rezoning cases C9-74-21 and C9-79-42. List the rezoning cases in the lower right corner next to the title block of all sheets. Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming related to the rezoning cases. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 4. COMMENT: This property is subject to Historic Review and approval. Contact Michael Taku at 520-837-4963 for information on the Historic Review process. List next to the title the case number assigned to the Historic review. As a general note, the list the case number date of approval and any conditions of the approval. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: If applicable list the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 6. COMMENT: Provide the distance and bearings along all site boundary lines. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 7. COMMENT: Clarify if there are any recorded easements on the overall site. If so draw, label and dimension the existing easements and label with the type and recording information. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: Clearly define the Public Amenity Area and label the square footage. Respond specifically how this project meets all the items under UDC Section 7.4.5.B.4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 9. COMMENT: Draw on the cover sheet a reduced detail drawing depicting the location of the offsite parking lot in relation to the Cultural site. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 10. COMMENT: List the number of existing short term bicycle parking facilities. Demonstrate that the distance is feet or less to the main entrance of the new building. Show the location of the long term bicycle facilities for the new use. Include detail drawings for the short and long term facilities. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 11. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming on this item, once the rezoning documents are submitted for review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
12/12/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | No landscaping is proposed at this time. However, the landscape section cannot approve plans until the site has been reviewed by the following: 5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ) AND "HL" HISTORIC LANDMARK (HL) Landscaping Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review. 5.12.6. IID PLAN REVIEW AND APPROVAL PROCEDURES UNDER THE IID ZONING OPTION. IID Historic Preservation Review Projects in an HPZ a. Proposed development projects within the boundaries of an HPZ must comply with HPZ Sections 5.8.7, Permitted Uses, 5.8.8, Design Review, and 5.8.9, Design Standards. Plans will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
12/14/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
12/17/2018 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0276 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING - TUCSON MUSEUM OF ART KASSER FAMILY GALLERY The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter the 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set 3) Items requested by review staff Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $0 (zero). Alexandra Hines, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: (520) 837-6975. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
---|---|---|---|
12/17/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |