Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0273
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/28/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ZONING REVIEW TRANSMITTAL FROM: Andrew Connor Planner PROJECT: DP19-0273 200 E Yavapai Elimination of Landscape Border Requirement. TRANSMITTAL: January 28, 2019 COMMENTS: The following comments are for the purpose of applying for a variance before the Board of Adjustment (UDC Section 3.10.1). This site is located in the R-3 zone (UDC 4.7.9). 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Street Landscape Borders 2. To enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape, a street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards: a. Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. Because of constraints of the existing site, portion of the required street landscape buffer is located entirely in public Right of Way. Located on Site c. Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. F. Use of the Public Right-of-Way Landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met: 1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type; 2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and, 3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Note: Community Garden and Urban Farm Uses are exempt from the landscape and screening requirements of Section 7.6.4. |
| 01/30/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Literacy Connects - Building and Parking Lot Expansion Development Package (1st Review) 200 E. E. Yavapai Road DP18-0273 - R-3 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 30, 2019 DUE DATE: January 30, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 08, 2019. Please address the follow up comments only and resubmit the DP for review. 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 4: It appears that design changes have been made to the vehicle parking areas in order to address the previous comments. As a result additional items must be addressed: a. Label the width of the three parallel parking spaces. b. The drop off area as proposed is unsafe and must be removed from within the PAAL area as drawn. Per a zoning administrator determination the drop-off areas must be adjacent to a sidewalk area that is a minimum of 6 feet wide and must be on the passenger side of the vehicle. A Minimum of three parallel drop-off spaces 8 feet by 23 feet are required, 1 space per 20 students. List the drop off calculation under the parking calculations. c. Label the width and length of the existing parking spaces. Include any overhang in the measurements, specifically along the west side of the parking lot. d. Add a wheel stop for the existing accessible parking space adjacent to the new sidewalk or the sidewalk must be constructed to 6.5 feet wide. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 6: Include a concrete sidewalk connection from the onsite pedestrian circulation to the new on-street sidewalk. The sidewalk connection must be a minimum of 4 feet wide. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 7: Short and long term bicycle parking facilities. a. The location of the short term bicycle facility has not been designed to be physically separated from the vehicle use area. Relocate the facility out of the vehicle use area or physically separate the facility with barriers (striping is not a barrier). Demonstrate that the short term facilities are within 50 feet of the main public entrance(s). Draw the public entrance(s) location(s) on the building footprint and label as such. b. The long term facilities location does not appear to meet the requirements in UDC Section 7.4.9.D. Demonstrate on the plans with dimensioned detail drawings specific to the long term facility location how the requirements of 7.4.9.D.1-5 will be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/31/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The site design is likely to change with comments from zoning and landscape. engineering will review the changes as presented to ensure no new issues are created. |
| 02/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Activity Number: DP18-0273 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING/SWPPP - LITERACY CONNECTS The review has been completed and a third submittal is required. To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made, submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. Please enter the Activity Number in the Project Description field and name the file as directed, for example, third submittal: 3_Plan_Set.pdf. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set with all documents 3) Items requested by review staff The current fee balance is $0 (zero). Alexandra Hines, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Alexandra.Hines@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-6975. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 12/31/2018 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |