Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP18-0263
Parcel: 124050470

Address:
708 N EUCLID AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP18-0263
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/10/2019 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/10/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change (The "Application is attached " mentioned here can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

Applicant to contact the City Real Estate Division at their earliest convenience to apply for review of proposed easements for any planned encroachments into City right-of-way.
Noted encroachments-There appears to be approximately 15 short term bicycle racks located in the public Right of way along N. Euclid Ave (Pg. 3 of 12 item 18). Owner will need to apply for a TRE. Application is attached.
Regards,
Michael J. Hollar, SENIOR PROPERTY AGENT
REAL ESTATE DIVISION
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CITY OF TUCSON
201 N. Stone Ave, 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
Direct: 520-837-6784, Main: 520-791-4371
06/12/2019 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Not all comments from 1st review were addressed.

Please review section D105.3 and indicate on plan (with dimensions) how aerial access will be maintained.
Verify with Tucson Water that the 6" dead end water main shown on the site utility plan will satisfy the demand for both the domestic water and the fire sprinkler system.
06/13/2019 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved DP18-0263 / 2nd Submittal for review / Tucson Marriott RI is Approved by Pima County Addressing.
Thank you,
Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
06/13/2019 SBEASLE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approved (The "enclosed PDF" mentioned at the bottom of this review can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section)

June 13, 2019
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Sharon Beasley, Permit Technician
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
RE: DP18-0263 / 2nd Submittal for review / Tucson Marriott
Dear Mrs. Beasley:
Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 1-1/4” and 2” gas main is located within the alley between 4th St. and University Blvd. In Addition, 1” gas mains are located within the right-of-way of Euclid Ave and within the proposed project area. Streets and or alleys and may be impacted by pavement saw cutting and driveway grading into the development along these streets.
Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements.
SWG also requests that no trees be planted within proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone.
All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable.
Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6049 or shawn.stoner@swgas.com.
Sincerely,
Shawn Stoner, Engineering Technician
Southern Arizona Division
Enclosed: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf)
07/01/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved The Environmental & General Services Department has reviewed the second submittal of the Development Package for the proposed Tucson Marriott site on E. 4th Street. It is proposed that a six story motel be constructed on this parcel.

The three waste containers will be rolled out to the loading zone on the south side of the building along E. 4th Street. The refuse trucks (servicing vehicle) will extend for a short distance into E. 4th Street while servicing the containers. East 4th Street is a private road and a University of Arizona parking structure is located at the east end of E. 4th Street. The Tucson Marriott motel will be the only structure on the north side of E. 4th Street between the parking structure and N. Euclid Avenue to the west. A University of Arizona student housing apartment is the only building located on the south side of E. 4th Street between the parking structure and N. Euclid Avenue.

Due to the limited vehicle traffic on E. 4th Street and because E. 4th Street is a private road, the Environmental & General Services Department would approve the servicing of the refuse containers, as proposed in the Development Package, within the loading zone along E. 4th Street on the south side of the building.

Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review.

Tom Ryan, P. E.
City of Tucson
Environmental & General Services Department
07/03/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD TDOT Reqs Change DP18-0263 - Tucson Marriott Residence Inn
TDOT Landscape-
1. Please include Standard Notes for Planting in the ROW to the Plans:
City of Tucson
Department of Transportation
Standard Notes for Planting in ROW
1. It is the owner’s responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section.
2. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5’ wide by 7’ tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property.
3. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15’ high clear zone over the travel lane.
4. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements.
5. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair.
6. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities.
7. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter)
8. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way.


2. Check the location and orientation of the Sight Visibility Triangles on the Landscape Plan.

Thank you,

David Marhefka
da’-vid mär-hef’-ka
Landscape Architect
City of Tucson, Department of Transportation
(o) 520-837-6618, (m) 520-403-5074
07/10/2019 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
07/16/2019 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
07/16/2019 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: Tucson Marriott RI
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP18-0263

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 16, 2019

DUE DATE: July 8, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 22, 2019.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

1. This comment was not addressed, Zoning was not able to find a submitted building plan to tie the approval to. This 2-06.4.8.B - The existing easements shown to be abandoned per separate instrument will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is comprised of five (5) parcels, 124-05-0430, 124-05-0440, 124-05-0450, 124-05-0460 & 124-05-0470 a combination of all lots is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request from with you next submittal.

3. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The provided number of vehicle parking space does not meet the number required per MGD Section C-5 and based on MGD-18-03 this was not addressed at the design review.

4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per MGD Section C-5.c.9 Minimum vehicle use area dimension. Parking structure, columns may protrude up to 6" into the clear area width. There are numerous columns around the perimeter of the parking structure that protrude into the clear depth of the vehicle parking space. Mezzanine Level, northwest corner there is a column in the middle of the space, and along the east side there are numerous columns that encroach into the space 1.3' east/west but no north/south encroachment is provided. Ground level along the east side there are 3 columns that appear to encroach, provide dimensions.

5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

6. Based on MGD-18-03 it does not appear that MS&R requirement have been addressed and it is not clear that MGD can waive MS&R requirements. 2-06.4.9.J - Per the COT MS&R map Euclid Avenue is designated as an Arterial with a future right-of-way (ROW) of 120'. Based on your plan the ROW is only at 80. Per UDC Article 5.4.5 you are required to develop to the future ROW or provided a future site plan that demonstrates how you will meet code when the ROW is taken.

7. Zoning was no able to find a building permit to tie the easement recordation to therefore this comment stands. 2-06.4.9.L - The proposed "4.63' WIDE PUBULIC ACCESS EASEMENTS" shown on sheet 6 will need to be recorded prior to approval of the DP.

8. Based on MGD-18-03 it does not appear that street perimeter yard setbacks have been addressed. 2-06.4.9.O - Per MGD Section C-3, Table 1 - Development Standards, Minimum Setback (1)(2)(3) (ii) the required street perimeter yard along Euclid Avenue is 12' from the property line, and it appears that you are proposing 0'. Per MGD Section C-18.d LUC Section 2.8.8.6C (HPZ Development Criteria - Setbacks) cannot be waived via historic.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/17/2019 KMANNIN1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The project does not comply with the 12' building setback required on Euclid. It appears that the applicant intends to reduce this requirement through an urban design best practice request. In order to receive approval for the setback reduction that the project proposes, please submit a letter outlining the urban design best practice request (see B-3 of the Main Gate ordinance for guidance).

2. The current proposal does not meet parking requirements. Per Main Gate ordinance C-5.a.3, parking requirements may be reduced, however you will need to submit a parking statement outlining your proposal.

KOREN MANNING, 7/17/19
07/17/2019 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
07/18/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE
The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required.
The fee balance is $0 (zero).
Permit/Activity Number: DP18-0263
Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/MGD - Tucson Marriott Residence Inn.
Project Manager: Steve.Shields@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4956
For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Please name your 3rd submittal documents accordingly, for example: 3_Plan_Set.
Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number.
1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments)
2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set)
3) Any other items requested by review staff
At resubmittal, the plans will enter another 20-working-day review cycle.
Thank you.
Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist

City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
Attn: Permit Counter/Payments
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/18/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed