Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0263
Parcel: 124050470

Address:
708 N EUCLID AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0263
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/06/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
11/06/2018 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
11/06/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/06/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0263

1) Aerial imagery from 1998-2018 shows that approximately 1/3 of the project site has remained un-developed. Provide supporting documentation in the drainage statement that the site has historically been developed from a drainage standpoint or provide detention for the new proposed development
2) If detention is required, Reference COT Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3
3) Sheet 3. Show a detail for the transition between Keynote 12 and Keynote 5 at the north west corner of the development
4) The proposed combination of drop off/loading/driveway/trash appears to have a substantial potential to cause vehicles to back out onto E 4th street and ultimately N Euclid Blvd. Show on plans any potential vehicle stacking based on projected vehicle average daily trips
5) Show on plans the required service vehicle maneuvering radius. Reference City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 8, Figure 7
6) The minimum width for a 2 way PAAL is 24'. The entrance to ground level parking and the drive aisle for the mezzanine parking is less than 24'. Reference COT Unified Development Code (UDE table 7.4.6-2
7) Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference City of Tucson Technical Standard (TSM) 7-01.4.1.E. coordinate placement with building plans
8) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to show the effective ponding area. Include spot grades at all proposed inlets


John Van Winkle, P.E.
201 N Stone Av.
520-837-5007
john.vanwinkle@tucsonaz.gov
11/06/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved P18WS00072 is Approved
11/06/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: Tucson Marriott RI
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0263

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2018

DUE DATE: October 30, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 22, 2019.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0263, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Remove the reference to HPZ-14-20 & T14SA00096 as this has expired. This should be listed as T18SA00446.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Once the Main Gate Overlay and Historic reviews are complete provide a general note that states the type of review, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.



4. 2-06.4.8.B - The existing easements shown to be abandoned per separate instrument will need to be abandoned prior to approval of this DP.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

5. 2-06.4.9.A - As this site is comprised of five (5) parcels, 124-05-0430, 124-05-0440, 124-05-0450, 124-05-0460 & 124-05-0470 a combination of all lots is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request from with you next submittal.

6. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show all applicable sight-visibility-triangles (SVTs) on the plan.

7. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" near the northwest corner of the structure, provide a PAAL width dimension from the southernmost "(COMPACT)" vehicle parking space west the vehicle parking spaces. This dimension should be measured from a compact space that has a minimum 16' depth.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It does not appear that the vehicle parking space calculation is correct. Per MGD Section C-5.a.iii - Other Non-Residential: Minimum 1 space per 1,000 square feet of GFA; Maximum 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Based on General Note 3 you are proposing two primary uses, Travelers Accommodation: Lodging & Food Service, but your vehicle parking calculation does not address this.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Depending on how comment 7 above is addressed the required number of accessible spaces may need to be revised.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a compact vehicle parking space calculation on the plan. The calculation needs to demonstrate compliance with MGD Section C-5.c.7.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per MGD Section C-5.c.10 tandem parking is not allowed for commercial uses.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" it does not appear that the "(COMPACT + TANDEM) vehicle parking spaces meet the minimum 16'-0" space depth per MGD Section C-5.c.7.

14. 2-06.4.9. H.5.a - Per MGD Section C-5.c.9 Minimum vehicle use area dimension. Parking structure, columns may protrude up to 6" into the clear area width provided that the length of the columns parallel to the vehicle when parking is not more than 30". Provide column length dimensions so that this requirement can be reviewed.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per MGD Section C-5.c.9 Minimum vehicle use area dimension. Parking structure, columns may protrude up to 6" into the clear area width. There are numerous columns around the perimeter of the parking structure that protrude into the clear depth of the vehicle parking space.

16. 2-06.4.9. H.5.a - Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.2 Access aisles serving car and van parking spaces shall be 60" minimum in width. Sheet 4 "GROUND LEVEL PARKING" northeast accessible parking spaces demonstrate that the access aisle width is maintained along the western most column.

17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - 2012 IBC Chapter 11 Section 1106.6 Location. Accessible parking spaces shall be located on the shortest accessible route of travel from the adjacent parking to an accessible building entrance. Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" southeast corner accessible vehicle parking space does not meet this requirement and should be moved closer to the lobby area with the elevators.

18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.2 Access aisles serving car and van parking spaces shall be 60" minimum in width. Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" southeast corner accessible vehicle parking space provide a width dimension for the proposed access aisles.

19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per ICC A117.1-2009 Section 502.4.3 Access aisles shall extend the full length of the parking spaces they serve. Sheet 4 "GROUND LEVEL PARKING" northeast accessible parking spaces it does not appear that the access aisles runs the full length of the parking spaces.

20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" northwest corner if a bicycle is stored in the northern most rack it would be almost impossible to exist a parking vehicle.

21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short term bicycle parking required number is not correct. 148,221 Sq. Ft./5000 = 29.6 or 30 required. Also it does not appear that 32 to spaces have been provide.

23. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The short term bicycle layout shown along the south side of the building does not meet best practice as it would be very difficult to access bicycles between the two sets of rack. If you wish to use this layout provide documentation that supports best practice for this layout.

24. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" long term bicycle parking does not provide the security as specified in LUC Section 3.3.9.4.B.

25. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" long term bicycle parking northern most rack would not be accessible if a vehicle is parked in the space adjacent to the rack and a bicycle is stored in the rack directly south.

26. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Sheet 4 "MEZZANINE LEVEL PARKING" long term bicycle parking provide a dimension between the two (2) rows of bicycle parking spaces.

27. 2-06.4.9.J - Per the COT MS&R map Euclid Avenue is designated as an Arterial with a future right-of-way (ROW) of 120'. Based on your plan the ROW is only at 80. Per UDC Article 5.4.5 you are required to develop to the future ROW or provided a future site plan that demonstrates how you will meet code when the ROW is taken.

28. 2-06.4.9.L - The proposed "4.63' WIDE PUBULIC ACCESS EASEMENTS" shown on sheet 6 will need to be recorded prior to approval of the DP.

29. 2-06.4.9.O - - Per MGD Section C-3, Table 1 - Development Standards, Minimum Setback (1)(2)(3) (ii) the required street perimeter yard along Euclid Avenue is 12' from the property line, and it appears that you are proposing 0'. Per MGD Section C-18.d LUC Section 2.8.8.6C (HPZ Development Criteria - Setbacks) cannot be waived via historic.

30. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building.

31. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet 4 "GROUND LEVEL PARKING" show the accessible route from the accessible vehicle parking spaces to an accessible entrance to the building.

32. Sheets 3 & 4 Keynotes reference details on sheet 6 but the details are on sheet 7.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/06/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Reqs Change Please see attached SWG response letter and snapshot of SWG facilities.



Thank you,

Erika



cid:image001.png@01CF5592.31817E70



Erika Fund | Engineering Technician



PO Box 26500 | 36O-580 | Tucson, AZ 85726.6500

direct 520.794.6241 | fax 520.794.6166 | mobile 520.429.9283

erika.fund@swgas.com | www.swgas.com

SEE Documents in PRO DP18-0263
11/06/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Main Gate District Development
Main Gate District Development Packages.
Review of Design Standards.
B-2.d.1. Design review for projects developed under the MGD zoning option that are
three stories or greater, or adjacent to Speedway Boulevard or Euclid Avenue, or in Area 1 shall be conducted by the Main Gate District Design Review Committee (DRC). The City's Design Professional shall review all other projects developed under the MGD zoning option.
Development of projects in the West University Historic Preservation Zone, and/or Contributing Properties (as defined in Section C-1) outside of the Historic Preservation Zone in the West University National Register District, and/or any properties that may become individually listed in the National Register of Historic Properties shall be subject to additional design review as provided in Section C-18 (Historic Preservation).

Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews.
Screening
C-7.a. Service areas for items such as backflow preventers and generators (but excluding
meters) shall be grouped in a joint area and located away from public view.
C-7.b. Steel, safety glass, vegetation or other malleable material may be used to provide visual
delimitation to desired area.
C-7.c. Service area screening shall not exceed 6 feet in height and must be composed of any
of the following (or combination of the following):
1. wall or structure; or
2. evergreen vegetation species that provide at least 50% coverage of service areas
upon installation and at least 90% coverage upon maturity.
C-7.d. Screen height may be up to 20 feet in height where adjacent to a multiple story building.

Indicate any screening any required screening locations and materials used.

Landscaping

C-9.a.4. Plants with thorns or terminal spines shall be placed clear of pedestrian circulation.
C-9.c. Street trees should be provided at areas of pedestrian circulation or activity and spaced
to ensure continuous canopy cover at maturity.

Open Space

C-10.e. Areas counted toward open space requirements shall be a minimum 300 square feet
with a minimum dimension of 15 feet if open on one side only or 10 feet if open on two or more sides.

C-10.d. Portions of ground-level open space that are not landscaped shall be surfaced in
textured concrete, pavers, or other similar small-scaled materials with permeable characteristics

If applicable, identify open space areas on landscape plan.

C-11. Right-of-Way Maintenance

C-11.a. The property owner is responsible at all times for maintenance of landscape,
hardscape, building architectural elements and site furnishings, including features installed in the public Right-of-Way (i.e., to the curb).

C-11.b. The property owner shall replace or repair vandalized elements in the Right-of-Way within 48 hours.

C-11.c. The property owner shall replace dead or missing vegetation in the Right-of-Way within
14 days to ensure full compliance with approved landscape plans.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
11/06/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
11/06/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/06/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***Attachment in SIRE/PRO under documents table.***

DP18-0263 Tucson Marriott RI / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

Please see the attached pdf with Addressing’s comments.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/06/2018 CLAURIE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Denied Project to be denied until the Design Review Committee portion has been approved.
11/06/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change Applicant to contact the City Real Estate Division at their earliest convenience to apply for review of proposed easements for any planned encroachments into City right-of-way, such as building columns, aerial encroachments of any kind including architectural details, balconies, etc, etc.

John

John Cahill
Interim Real Estate Administrator
City Dept. of Transportation
201 North Stone Av. 6th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6768
11/06/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/06/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Please review section D105.3 and indicate on plan (with dimensions) how aerial access will be maintained.
Please indicate on plan if this will be considered a high rise (75' to the floor of the highest occupiable level). If it is, 2 underground pipes, separated by a valve, are needed to supply the sprinkler system. The dead end water main shown on the site utility plan would not satisfy this requirement.
Verify with Tucson Water that the 6" dead end water main shown on the site utility plan will satisfy the demand for both the domestic water and the fire sprinkler system.
11/07/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change Environmental & General Services has reviewed the Development Package for the proposed Tucson Marriott RI site at the northeast corner of the intersection of N. Euclid Avenue and E. 4th Street.

The waste generation calculations were reviewed and found to be correct. Maintaining the three 4 cubic yard containers inside the building will effectively screen the containers from view from adjacent properties.

We have the following two concerns with placement and servicing of the containers:

1. The ground surface slopes on the southern loading zone / drop off area appear to be 15 % sloping from the south edge of the building toward E. 4th Street. Can the refuse containers be safely positioned on the loading zone with this steep of a ground slope? Can the containers be safely picked up by the servicing vehicle with this ground slope? Or is the loading zone designed to be less steep than 15%

2. The loading zone is 8 feet deep by 36 feet wide. There is a curb and sidewalk immediately west of the loading zone area. There is a second curb located about 22 feet east of the loading zone. How will the service vehicle access the containers? A 40 foot by 14 foot access and operational area is required in front of the containers to safely service the containers. The applicant shall show the service vehicle maneuvering route and the associated truck turning radii. East 4th Street dead ends immediately east of the subject property at the University of Arizona parking garage. How will the service vehicle exit the loading zone area? Backing of the service vehicle onto N. Euclid Avenue would not be approved.

Please have the applicant address these issues in the resubmittal of the Development Package.

Thank you.

Tom Ryan, P. E.
City of Tucson - Environmental & General Services Department
11/07/2018 GARY WITTWER COT NON-DSD TDOT Reqs Change 1. No cactus in this narrow area along either street.

2. No irrigation equipment - controller, backflow and RC valve in ROW.

3. TDOT is concerned about the liability of Hackberry this close to the roadway. We allow it in areas where traffic is slow. This is a concern from both the future trunk caliper and the vegetation extending into the travel lane. Trees would have to be trimmed up to a minim of 15'. You will need to get approval from TDOT City Engineer.

Gary Wittwer
11/13/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0263
Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/MGD - TUCSON MARRIOTT RI

To see review comments about the plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search and enter activity number above.

This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:
1) Corrected plan set
2) Items requested by review staff

Please type the activity number in Project Description or Message of PDSD Filedrop for resubmittal. Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,
2_plan_set.pdf
2_response_letter.pdf

Alexandra Hines
11/13/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved November 13, 2018

WR# 6252019

DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov

Dear Kelly,

SUBJECT: Tucson Marriot
714 N Euclid
DP18-0263

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan.

There is a conflict with pole unit 199, the existing secondary & service conductors within the development. The relocation/removal of the facilities are billable to the customer. If further relocations are necessary, this too will be billable to the customer. TEP will determine feed to the hotel once final, approved plans are submitted to TEP and shall include the electrical site and load plans.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Rich Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas @ 918-8295.

Sincerely,
Beth Shelton
Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton
Admin Assistant, Design

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/13/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed