Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0262
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/12/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Hydrant locations have been added to the plan set. |
| 04/01/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/01/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | A right of way permit will be required for work on new access ramp. At time of right of way permiting (TDOT) for the new access ramp at the driveway and Tucson Blvd, the aspalt across the driveway will need to be replaced to meet a 6 foot wide path (no more than 2% cross slope) to meet ADA standards. The existing is substandard. |
| 04/01/2019 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | ***Attachment can be viewed in documents table on PRO (SIRE).*** The Addressing review of DP18-0262 for Midvalley Apartments, 2nd Submittal, is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing's comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 04/02/2019 | NROSS1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments |
| 04/02/2019 | NICHOLAS ROSS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Midvalley Apartments - Multi-family Residential Use (Applicable C9-77-05) Development Package (1st Review) - 140 S. Tucson Boulevard DP18-0262 - C-1/C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 28, 2018 DUE DATE: November 28, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2019. 1. COMMENT: Sheets are out of order. 2. COMMENT: Rezoning conditions have not been listed 3. COMMENT: Under the zoning notes text block, "note 3" identify the existing use(s) on the subject site. List the use specific standards applicable to the proposed use(s) on the site; refer to the UDC C-2 Use tables. 4. COMMENT: Referring to previous Comment 13: "It is clear that that site will function as a residential development with possible accessory uses or possibly a second principle use. However it is requested that all parcels that make up this development are combined into one thus eliminating the lot lines crossing buildings. A Pima County Tax Parcel Combo should be completed prior to approval of the DP. Copies of the parcel combo shall be submitted with the next submittal or no later than the final submittal of the DP." There are several parcels that make up the site. If a lot combo is not wanted, then an Access Easement will be required across all parcels. 5. COMMENT: If the owner chooses not to do a lot combination, an access easement must be drawn on the plan. 6. COMMENT: Address the following comments related to the onsite vehicular use areas and PAALs: The existing parking structures are not dimensioned and must be setback a minimum of one foot from the back end of the parking spaces. The structures may not encroach onto the PAALs. Include a dimensioned cross section at PAAL areas where the parking structure is proposed or existing. A back-up spur is required adjacent to the east side of "Building 5". The parking space closest to the "Building 5" does not appear to have sufficient back up area. This parking space may not be a viable when the correct back-up spur design is drawn in. Dimension the back-up spur adjacent to the north side of "Building 1" Label the width of the PAAL in this parking area. Also the note related to the existing covered parking shall be removed as this area does not appear to have covered parking. The width of the area behind the back-up spur shall be a minimum of four feet and should include a four-foot wide sidewalk. A total of 5 Accessible parking spaces are required for this project of which one must be a Van Accessible space. The accessible parking shall be distributed throughout the development to provide accessible spaces to each building. Only three appear to be provided. Van accessible spaces must be a minimum of 16 feet wide which includes the access aisle. Revise the accessible parking details to include the regular accessible parking spaces with a five-foot wide access aisle and a van accessible spaces that includes an eight-foot wide access aisle. Demonstrate on the site plan that vehicle parking spaces that abut sidewalks (unless sidewalks are 6.5 feet wide), property lines, landscape areas etc., will be provided with wheel stops. There are several areas not depicting wheel stops, revise the site plan as required. 7. COMMENT: Dimension all sidewalks. The minimum width is four feet and 6.5 feet where parking spaces abut the sidewalk and are not provided with wheel stops. Also demonstrate on the site plan the cross and longitudinal slopes for all existing and proposed sidewalks. Additionally, all sidewalks must be physically separated from vehicular use areas (PAALs, drive lanes etc.). Striped area along the north side of the site shall be constructed of concrete and physically separated. The only location where the walkway can be striped is where crossing the PAAL or Drive lane. The asphalt area cannot be used for the required sidewalk except as noted for a crosswalk crossing a PAAL or Drive lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, contact Nick Ross at (520) 837-4029 or by email Nicholas.ross@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/09/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0262 1) Reorder sheets in PDF so they are in numerical order 2) Follow up on previous comment 2. Show the required service vehicle turning radius showing that when a service vehicle is heading north on the eastern most PAAL, it can turn East onto the One way Drive exiting the property. 3) Follow up on previous comment 4. Add note to plans that all curb access ramps will comply with ICC A117.1 John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 04/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Activity Number: DP18-0262 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING - Midvalley Apartments. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After all corrections are made, name your documents accordingly – for example, a 3rd submittal document would be titled: 3_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which reviewer comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. The fee balance is $0 (zero). The Project Manager can be reached via email: Nicholas.Ross@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4029. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |