Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0261
Parcel: 141020250

Address:
9900 E DREXEL RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP18-0261
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2019 SBEASLE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved All of our previous comments have been adequately addressed. Tucson Parks and Recreation recommends approval of this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
01/07/2019 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved Applicant shall submit an accompanying sealed letter certifying substantial conformance to meet PAD requirement.

The Saguaro Trails Plan Area Development:

III.G.4 Architectural Review & Self-Certification at Time of Building Permits, given the extent of architectural character, design, and detail presented in this PAD document for Saguaro Trails, no separate or subsequent architectural review process is required for the project. The only protocol that will apply in this regard is the substantial conformance of the ultimate residences and structures with the aesthetics, architectural concept, building elevations, colors, and materials presented herein. The builder shall, at the time of submittal for building permits to PDSD, submit an accompanying sealed letter certifying this substantial conformance and referencing applicable Section III.G of this PAD.

If available now, please provide with development package resubmittal.

Alexandra Hines
01/23/2019 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
01/24/2019 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plans Returned for Corrections Notice
Activity Number: DP18-0261
Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - SHARP, TUCSON WATER

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number.
(If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed.
After the necessary corrections have been made, submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd.
Please enter the Activity Number in the “Project Description” field and name the files as directed, for example, third submittal: 3_Plan_Set.pdf
The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle.­
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set with all documents
3) Items requested by review staff
The current fee balance is $0 (zero).
Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Services
201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
12/21/2018 SBEASLE1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
12/31/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Approved
12/31/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager


PROJECT: Southeast Houghton Recharge Project (SHARP)
Development Package (2nd Review) 9900 E. Drexel Road
DP18-0261 - PAD 30 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 31, 2018
DUE DATE: January 23, 2019

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. Addressed COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

2. Addressed COMMENT: Include in the title block of all plan sheets a brief legal description of the subject parcel.


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

3. Addressed ACOMMENT: It is suggested that the DP package only include the sheets that are applicable to the Development Package standards such as, site, landscape irrigation, grading details, parking lot, etc. and not include any of the construction documents. However, if the intent is to keep all the sheets submitted in the DP package, it is requested that the DP sheet documents be placed together in consecutive order for review of said documents for compliance with the DS 2-06.

It was also noted that there are at least 24 sheets missing from the set. In the title block the sheet number of sheets should be revised to the correct number of sheets in the Package. Sheets 86 - 110 are not included in the package.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. Addressed COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0261, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List the administrative address next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.
2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;
2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,
2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

5. This comment was not fully addressed. Label the section corners on the location map. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet a location map that meets the standards 2-06.4.4 - 2-06.4.4.C as noted above.


2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

6. This comment was not addressed. Provide a map of the entire PAD. COMMENT: Provide the map of the overall PAD area as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

7. Addressed COMMENT: On sheet 18 list as a general note the overall site area in acreage and square feet.

2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

8. Addressed COMMENT: List as reference the Rezoning case number C9-16-09 next to the title block of all plan sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

9. Addressed COMMENT: Identify the use for this area as allowed in the PAD.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. Addressed COMMENT: On sheet 37 "Parking Details" Revise the Handicap sign to show the 7-foot clearance is from the bottom of the lowest sign on the post, in this case the bottom of the van accessible sign.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

11. Zoning acknowledges key note 3 but the reference to "COT DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 2-09.0" is not correct. The reference should be to the Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 7.4.9. Also provide a detail for the proposed short term bicycle parking that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B & .C are met. COMMENT: Clarify if any short or long term bicycle parking facilities are proposed on the development site? If so draw and label the location, types and the number of facilities.

Additional comments
1. Remove all deltas and clouds from the plan.

Once the above comments are addressed Zoning is willing to provide an over the counter review.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/24/2019 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed