Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0260
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/10/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | January 9, 2019 Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0260 Rojo Ironworks / 2nd Submittal, Received January 8, 2019 Dear Ms. Beasley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0260, Rojo Ironworks; 2nd Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.71 acre site, located northeast of the intersection of South Randall Boulevard and East Valencia Road. The property is zoned Park Industrial (P-I), with the proposed development being a commercial / administrative office. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, FAA Part 77 airspace, and the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zone. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Condition of approval: 1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the City of Tucson consider requiring the applicant to add the following note into the general notes of the revised development plans. This project is located approximately 1/10th of a mile north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport. The proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are in proximity an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through requiring the property owner to record the Avigation Easement. The Tucson Airport Authority believes the proposed note helps to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4). 1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner |
| 01/28/2019 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/29/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/05/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | Any changes to site or grading plans will require revisions to landscape plans. |
| 02/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Rojo Iron Works - Commercial Use - Administration Office Development Package (1st Review) 6461 S. Randall Boulevard DP18-0260 - P-I Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 5, 2019 DUE DATE: February 6, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2019. Please respond to the Follow up Comments Only. "Previous comments have been left as reference." 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 6: The DP case number was not listed on the landscape sheets 5 - 8. List the DP case number next to the title block of sheets 5-8. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Previous Comment 5: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0260, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. Follow up to Previous Comment 7: It is not clear that the Avigation easement comment was addressed in your response. Please confirm if contact was made with Scott Robidoux Airport Planner for easement requirements. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. Previous Comment 7: Add a general note that states the following; "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R setback regulations UDC Section 5.4." This parcel is within the Tucson Airport Environs Zone and the Avigation Easement and Disclosure Areas. The site is with the AEZ height zones 65-70 and 75-80 and a portion of the south area of is within the 65-75 LDN overlay. Refer to USDC section 5.6 for information on the AEZ requirements. Refer to the PDSD GIS map for the Height zone locations and LDN overlay. Both the height zones and LDN overlay must be drawn and labeled on the site plan sheets. This parcel is with the flight pattern of the NW and NE runways. As a general note list the end of runway MSL elevations for both runways and list the highest elevation of the parcel. The MSL for the NE runway is 2569 and 2578 for the NW runway. The additional calculation that needs to be included is the height difference between the NE and NW end of runway elevations and the parcel plus building height elevation. (Example, site elevation where the building is to be constructed or placed is 2546 plus the building height of 15 from ground equals 2561 elevation which is 8 feet difference than the NE runway and 17 feet difference than the NW end of runway. Add the AEZ information and calculations on the cover sheet. Include a general note that this "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R setback regulations UDC Section 5.6." This area is within the Airport Avigation easement. A review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner is required. Contact Kelly Lee PDSD Lead Planner at Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov for more information on the Avigation easement requirements. 3. Follow up to Previous Comment 12: The proposed short term bicycle facilities added to the plans are not considered acceptable. Please review UDC Article 7 section 7.4.9 for acceptable facility types. See the bike rack design Figure 7.4.9-B and dimensional layouts7.4.9-C for additional information needed on the plans. Draw and label the public entrance to the Modular building. Short term facilities must be within 50 feet of the public entrance. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Previous Comment 12: Include a dimensioned detail drawing of the bicycle parking facilities area. 4. Follow up to Previous Comment 16: Label the cross and longitudinal slopes on the sidewalk system or add a general note that states all sidewalks will be constructed not to exceed a 2% cross slope and 5% longitudinal slope. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Previous Comment 16: The onsite pedestrian circulation must be provided out to the Randall Road sidewalk. Sidewalks must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas and must be no less than four feet in width. The sidewalk must have a cross slope of no more than 2% and longitudinal slope of not more than 5%. Draw, dimension and label the sidewalk from the building location out to the Randall Road sidewalk If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development pac |
| 02/05/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments. |
| 02/07/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Since the sidewalk along Valencia Road is less than 4 feet wide, the sidewalk must be replaced with a 6-foot sidewalk. Revise the plans accordingly. |
| 02/08/2019 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0260 Project Description: E SITE/GRADE - ROJO IRON WORKS The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter for the reviewers detailing what changes have been made to the plan and what review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, please submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd: 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set 3) Items requested by review staff The plans will then re-enter the 20 working day review cycle.Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $0. Mark Castro, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: 520-837-4979. Thank you. Alexandra Hines City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/08/2019 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |