Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0260
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/30/2018 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/19/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | November 19, 2018 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0251 PROJECT NAME: Rojo Iron works PROJECT ADDRESS: 6461 S Randall Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development Package 1. Revise Driveway to new standard driveway with 18 foot curb returns. No wedge curb at driveway. 2. New access ramps required at the new driveway along Randall Blvd. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/21/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Rojo Iron Works - Commercial Use - Administration Office Development Package (1st Review) 6461 S. Randall Boulevard DP18-0260 - P-I Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2018 DUE DATE: November 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 22, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: The title block on all sheets should match and include the same information. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 2. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from sheets 1-4. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 3. COMMENT: The information in the title blocks should all match including the name of the project; revise as required. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4. COMMENT: The information in the title blocks should all match including brief legal description of the parcel; revise as required. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0260, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 6. COMMENT: Revise the proposed use of the property as follows; The proposed use is Commercial - Administrative Office Subject UDC Use Specific Standards Section 4.9.13.Q. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 7. COMMENT: Add a general note that states the following; "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R setback regulations UDC Section 5.4." This parcel is within the Tucson Airport Environs Zone and the Avigation Easement and Disclosure Areas. The site is with the AEZ height zones 65-70 and 75-80 and a portion of the south area of is within the 65-75 LDN overlay. Refer to USDC section 5.6 for information on the AEZ requirements. Refer to the PDSD GIS map for the Height zone locations and LDN overlay. Both the height zones and LDN overlay must be drawn and labeled on the site plan sheets. This parcel is with the flight pattern of the NW and NE runways. As a general note list the end of runway MSL elevations for both runways and list the highest elevation of the parcel. The MSL for the NE runway is 2569 and 2578 for the NW runway. The additional calculation that needs to be included is the height difference between the NE and NW end of runway elevations and the parcel plus building height elevation. (Example, site elevation where the building is to be constructed or placed is 2546 plus the building height of 15 from ground equals 2561 elevation which is 8 feet difference than the NE runway and 17 feet difference than the NW end of runway. Add the AEZ information and calculations on the cover sheet. Include a general note that this "This project has been designed to comply with the MS&R setback regulations UDC Section 5.6." This area is within the Airport Avigation easement. A review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner is required. Contact Kelly Lee PDSD Lead Planner at Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov for more information on the Avigation easement requirements. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8. COMMENT: Label the curb to property line dimensions for Randall Boulevard and Valencia Road. Label the street names adjacent to the subject property. Label the recordation data for both streets and include any missing information on the plans as listed in the standard above. Label the centerline of Valencia Road to the current property line. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 9. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications adjacent to the subject property including across the streets. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 10. COMMENT: Label as adjacent streets as Public. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 11. COMMENT: Label the width of the accessible parking space and aisle. Include the word typical under the width dimension of the parking spaces if they are all proposed to be nine feet wide. Parking spaces must be provided with wheel stops 2.5 feet from the front of the parking spaces to keep motor vehicles from overhanging onto the sidewalk or the sidewalk must be widened to 6.5 feet. If the sidewalk is widened to 6.5 feet draw and label the 2.5 feet overhang if wheel stops are not provided. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 12. COMMENT: Include a dimensioned detail drawing of the bicycle parking facilities area. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 13. COMMENT: Valencia Road is an Arterial road listed on the Adopted Major Streets and Routes Map and is subject to future right of way widening. Per the MS&R map the future right of way for Valencia Road is 150 feet. It does not appear that the full right of way has been dedicated or acquired for this portion of Valencia Road. Before submitting the DP for the second review consult with TDOT regarding the future widening of Valencia to assess how the widening will affect the proposed development. Typically on vacant land and when adjacent to arterial streets, new development must be designed to comply with the future right of way property location. Assuming that the future right of way is to be required for future roadway widening, the future half right of way will be 75 feet according to the MS&R map. Per the current overall R of W width of 100 feet and additional 50 feet would be required typically 25 feet on each side of the centerline or construction center line. This could affect the placement of the proposed building due to the building setback requirements. Consult with COT TDOT for more information. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 14. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 15. COMMENT: Label the existing and future building setbacks from the Valencia Road back of curb locations. Label the building setbacks from the back of curb location from Randall Boulevard. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 16. COMMENT: The onsite pedestrian circulation must be provided out to the Randall Road sidewalk. Sidewalks must be physically separated from the vehicular use areas and must be no less than four feet in width. The sidewalk must have a cross slope of no more than 2% and longitudinal slope of not more than 5%. Draw, dimension and label the sidewalk from the building location out to the Randall Road sidewalk 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 17. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label any proposed freestanding monument signs. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/21/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 11/23/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to thebase plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Street Landscape Borders Street landscape border is required in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1 along the street frontage of a site. Site The land area consisting of an entire lot, or contiguous lots designated for development as a single entity. Street Landscape Buffers are required the full length of the property excluding ingress or egress. Barriers Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Identify curbing on landscape plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 11/28/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location of water lines and fire hydrants. b. The location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The proposed point of connection to the existing public sewer. d. Any existing or proposed utility easements Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 11/30/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 12/03/2018 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 12/03/18 Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0260 Project Description: E SITE/GRADE - ROJO IRON WORKS The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter for the reviewers detailing what changes have been made to the plan and what review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, please submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd: 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set 3) Items requested by review staff The plans will then re-enter the 20 working day review cycle. Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $1,614.60. Review fees must be paid prior to the 2nd submittal review. Mark Castro, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: 520-837-4979. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Svcs. Dept. 201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |