Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0258
Parcel: 117141430

Address:
450 S MEYER AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0258
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/19/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/22/2018 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
10/22/2018 MASHFOR1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
10/22/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: Kennedy and Meyer Townhomes
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0258

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 22, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 17, 2019.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.2 - Add "TENTATIVE PLAT" to the title block adjacent to "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE".

2. 2-06.4.2.C - Describe what "COMMON AREA A" is within the title block,

3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number "DP18-0258" adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. 2-06.4.3 - Once the Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) review is complete provide the HPZ case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This number will be a "T18SA0####" number.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Geneal Note 5 remove the reference to UDC Article "4.7.23 & 4.9.7.B" as they are not applicable.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - Remove General Note 4 from the plan as it is not applicable.

7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a general note list the HPZ case number, date of approval, conditions of approval if applicable and if development standards modifications requested list what modification were approved.

8. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Once the final plat "S" number is issued provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Provide a lot coverage calculation for each lot.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions.
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

10. 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet 3 "RECORD DATA KEYNOTE" 1 provide the page number for the required recordation information.

11. 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet 3 "RECORD DATA KEYNOTE" 2 you reference abandoning part of the easement. Provide the recordation information for this abandonment.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

12. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each lot by lot number not "UNIT".

13. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - As a private street is proposed per AM 2-06.4.9.H.1the street is required to meet the requirements of TSM Section 10-01.0.0. As the propose private street section does not meet the standard a Technical Standards Modification Request will need to be applied for and approved. Review Engineering comments to ensure that the correct TSM Sections are referenced in your TSMR.

14. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

The following street perimeter yard setback comments are relative to an application for Historic Review (UDC 5.8.8).
15. 2-06.4.9.O - Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, the required street perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. That said the setbacks are not shown correctly and should be shown to the edge of travel lane;
As wall heights were not provided on the DP the heights listed are from elevations provided by the architect. If these heights change this project may be required to go back through HPZ review;
Unit 1 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 18'-7".
Unit 2 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 17'-1".
Unit 3 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-8".
Unit 4 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-6".
Unit 5 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-3".
Unit 6 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 15'-10".
Unit 7 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 15'-6".
Unit 7 South - Dimensions do not align with the proposed building therefore Zoning cannot complete this comment.
Unit 13 South - Dimensions do not align with the proposed building therefore Zoning cannot complete this comment.

16. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide street perimeter yard setbacks for all structures along the proposed private street, see UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 140 or less.

17. 2-06.4.9.R - As you are proposing to eliminate sidewalks along the majority of the private street, both sides as required a TSMR will be needed.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - Unit 8 show at least one sidewalk to a street.

19. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

20. 2-06.4.9.V - Sheets 2 & 3 remove the landscape items shown on the plan.

21. As you are proposing to subdivide parcel 117-14-146A via this project a new development package will need to be provided to PDSD so that records has the correct DP for this commercial site.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/22/2018 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Section Manager

PROJECT: Kennedy and Meyer Townhomes
Development Package (1st Review) - Revised 10/23/18
DP18-0258

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 22, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, an applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is October 17, 2019.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.2 - Add "TENTATIVE PLAT" to the title block adjacent to "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE".

2. 2-06.4.2.C - Revise "LOTS 1-143" to read "LOTS 1-13".

3. 2-06.4.2.C - Describe what "COMMON AREA A" is within the title block,

4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number "DP18-0258" adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. 2-06.4.3 - Once the Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ) review is complete provide the HPZ case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This number will be a "T18SA0####" number.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - General Note 5 remove the reference to UDC Article "4.7.23 & 4.9.7.B" as they are not applicable.

7. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - Remove General Note 4 from the plan as it is not applicable.

8. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a general note list the HPZ case number, date of approval, conditions of approval if applicable and if development standards modifications requested list what modification were approved.

9. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Once the final plat "S" number is issued provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Provide a lot coverage calculation for each lot.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions.
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

11. 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet 3 "RECORD DATA KEYNOTE" 1 provide the page number for the required recordation information.

12. 2-06.4.8.B - Sheet 3 "RECORD DATA KEYNOTE" 2 you reference abandoning part of the easement. Provide the recordation information for this abandonment.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

13. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each lot by lot number not "UNIT".

14. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - As a private street is proposed per AM 2-06.4.9.H.1the street is required to meet the requirements of TSM Section 10-01.0.0. As the propose private street section does not meet the standard a Technical Standards Modification Request will need to be applied for and approved. Review Engineering comments to ensure that the correct TSM Sections are referenced in your TSMR.

15. 2-06.4.9.L - As a private street is proposed and it crosses property lines an easement is required. Zoning acknowledges that you have provided keynote 1, clarify how this easement will be recorded.

The following street perimeter yard setback comments are relative to an application for Historic Review (UDC 5.8.8).
16. 2-06.4.9.O - Per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000, the required street perimeter yard is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, greater of the two, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. That said the setbacks are not shown correctly and should be shown to the edge of travel lane;
As wall heights were not provided on the DP the heights listed are from elevations provided by the architect. If these heights change this project may be required to go back through HPZ review;
Unit 1 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 17'-7".
Unit 2 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 17'-4".
Unit 3 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-11".
Unit 4 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-7".
Unit 5 East - Based on a wall height of 14'-6" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-5".
Unit 6 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 16'-1".
Unit 7 East - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 15'-9".
Unit 7 South - Based on a wall height of 13'-10" the required perimeter yard setback is 21'-0", provided is 20'-10".

17. 2-06.4.9.O - Provide street perimeter yard setbacks for all structures along the proposed private street, see UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 140 or less.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - As you are proposing to eliminate sidewalks along the majority of both sides of the private street, a TSMR will be needed.

19. 2-06.4.9.R - Unit 8 show at least one sidewalk to a street.

20. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

21. 2-06.4.9.V - Sheets 2 & 3 remove the landscape items shown on the plan.

22. Lots 6 & 7 it appears that the proposed roof will overhang into the right-of-way, some type of easement or temporary use permit maybe required, contact TDOT Real Estate department.

23. As you are proposing to subdivide parcel 117-14-146A via this project a new development package will need to be provided to PDSD so that records has the correct DP for this commercial site.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/23/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved No objections/adverse comments. See comments in PRO under documents.
11/05/2018 NROSS1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond November 5, 2018

Kelly Lee
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0258 Kennedy & Meyer / 1st Submittal, Received October 22, 2018

Dear Ms. Lee,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0258, Kennedy & Meyer; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.99 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of West Kennedy Street and South Meyer Avenue. The property is zoned Historical Commercial 3 (HC-3), with the proposed development being residential dwelling units.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.

Condition of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the City of Tucson consider requiring the applicant to add the two following notes into the general notes of the revised development plans. This project is located approximately 6 miles northwest of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport.

The first proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are living near an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through requiring the property owner to record the Avigation Easement. The second proposed note is meant to be a second method of notification, but only for residential related uses, that future property owners and tenants are living near an airport. The Tucson Airport Authority believes these two proposed notes help to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4).

1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

2. "The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new unit purchases. In the event the development of any residential uses does not involve the sale of new units, but is instead offering rental residential units to the public, the new tenant of the rental unit shall be provided a copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form. The intent of the Airport Disclosure Statement form is to educate and notify the new residents that they are living near an airport. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The new property owner or new tenant shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to the Tucson Airport Authority, using the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,

Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner
11/13/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change November 13, 2018
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0258
PROJECT NAME: Kennedy and Meyer
PROJECT ADDRESS: 450 S Meyer Ave
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development Package

1. Revise driveway apron detail to reflect PAG Standard detail 206.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
11/14/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Include HPZ and DP case numbers on all sheets of submittal.
7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Underlining Zone Requirements
Residential Subdivisions
Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards.
(1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages.
(2) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border.
(3) The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section.
(4) Street landscape borders fronting on local streets may be reduced to a minimum of five feet.

This site is within:

5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ)

5.8.8. DESIGN REVIEW REQUIRED

Full HPZ Review Procedure
1. Applicability

The following project types are reviewed for compliance with the applicable standards in accordance with the Full HPZ Review Procedure

Grading or the erection or construction of a new structure;

5.8.9. DESIGN STANDARDS

Landscaping
Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structures. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review.

Use of the Public Right-of-Way

Landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met:
1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type;
2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and,
3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
11/14/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
11/15/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/15/2018 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Passed Separate submittal required for Pima County Wastewater review. Email sewer@pima.gov
11/15/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/16/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Revise the site plan to indicate which buildings will require the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Show the point of connection to the private sewer for unit 11. Reference: Section 701.2, IPC 2012.
11/16/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0258
1. Clarify the extent of the proposed wall. The same line seems to show existing fence to remain and a new wall.
2. Clearly dimension new sidewalk and new street.
3. Provide a vertical separation by curb or other barrier between the vehicle use areas and landscape or pedestrian areas. (UDC 7.4.6.H.1)
4. The proposed street section is not representative of the sections in TS 10-01. Provide 24 feet of pavement width and sidewalk on both sides. Otherwise provide a TSMR for modification of the standard.
5. Clearly show how water harvesting will be maximized. (UDC 7.6.6.C)
6. Clearly define the area outside of the subdivision to be disturbed by this project. If the disturbed area outside of the subdivision is greater than 60 square feet, provide a complete SWPPP.
7. Provide water surface contours for the flood hazard area adjacent to the project site. Ensure that all structures are above the WSE for each location.
11/19/2018 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved Water Availability Letter uploaded to documents in PRO.
11/20/2018 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change Pima County Addressing has not received payment for the Addressing Review of DP18-0258 for Kennedy and Meyer Townhomes. This review can only be completed by Pima County Addressing after the attached invoice has been paid.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/20/2018 FRANK PODGORSKI HPZ ADVISORY BOARD HPZ ADVISORY BOARD DATE Reqs Change Requires HPZ review and approval prior to development package approval. This folder is for HPZ staff, Michael Taku or Jodie Brown, to check development package for consistency/compliance against HPZ submittal in lieu of wet stamp on development package.
12/11/2018 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0258
Project Description: E PLAT - KENNEDY AND MEYER TOWNHOMES

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required.
To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.)
Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, please submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter the 20 working day review cycle.
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set
3) Items requested by review staff
Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page.
The current fee balance is $1,481.50 (see image below). Review fees must be paid prior to the second submittal review.
Steve Shields, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: 520-837-4956.
Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Svcs. Dept.
201 N. Stone Ave., First Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
12/26/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved TEP hadn’t seen any movement on it since we sent an Equipment Placement (EP) out in December of 2017. With the latest submittal it was noted that the lot layout was no longer the same. They changed the plat and a new EP and Field visit were needed. Design has the new EP in for QA/QC.
Courtney Tejeda
Right of Way Agent
Land Resources Dept. RC131
Tucson Electric Power Co.
3950 E. Irvington Rd., Tucson, AZ 85714-2114

12/12/18 email:
Re: Activity Number: DP18-0258
Address: 450 S Meyer
Due Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for Kennedy & Meyer Townhomes submitted on 10/22/2018.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-918-8205.
Thank you,
Courtney Tejeda
Right of Way Agent
Land Resources Dept. RC131
Tucson Electric Power Co.
3950 E. Irvington Rd., Tucson, AZ 85714-2114

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/11/2018 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed