Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0257
Parcel: 132131010

Address:
2975 S KINO PW

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0257
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/22/2018 NROSS1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/24/2018 MASHFOR1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
10/26/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
10/26/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
10/26/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/05/2018 NROSS1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond November 5, 2018

Nick Ross
Lead Planner
City of Tucson
Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue
Tucson, AZ. 85701

RE: DP18-0257 Mister Car Wash / 1st Submittal, Received October 22, 2018

Dear Mr. Ross,

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0257, Mister Car Wash; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 2.14 acre site, located southeast of the intersection of Duvall Vista and South Kino Parkway. The property is zoned Planned Area Development 15 (PAD-15), with the proposed development being an automotive washing use.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan.

Condition of approval:

1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp"

Although this project does not propose a change in plan designation or zoning the Tucson Airport Authority highly recommends the City of Tucson consider requiring the applicant to add the following note into the general notes of the revised development plans. This project is located approximately 3 ½ miles north of Tucson International Airport and is within FAA traffic pattern airspace, an area which would be subject to aircraft overflight and noise due to being in close proximity to Tucson International Airport.

The proposed note would provide a means of assuring that future owners and tenants of the property are aware they are near an airport and further assures the continued right of the City of Tucson, Tucson Airport Authority, and all persons lawfully utilizing the Tucson International Airport the right to utilize the airspace above or near the property. This would be accomplished through requiring the property owner to record the Avigation Easement. The Tucson Airport Authority believes this proposed note help to support the City of Tucson Airport Environs Overlay Zone and supports Plan Tucson - Regional and Global Positioning policy 4 (RG-4).

1. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Senior Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,

Scott Robidoux,
Senior Airport Planner
11/05/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The proposed development will have no impacts the any nearby ADOT facilities.
11/05/2018 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on the submittal and supports its acceptance.
The location of the development has sufficient separation from nearby ADOT facilities based on a right in and right out access to Kino Parkway. Thank you.
Tom Martinez <TMartinez@azdot.gov>
11/15/2018 9:32 AM
11/14/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments
11/14/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/14/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Mr. Carwash At The Bridges - Commercial, Automotive Service and Repair - Carwash
Development Package (1st Review) 2975 S. Kino Parkway
DP18-0257 - Pad 15

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 14, 2018
DUE DATE: November 20, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 17, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected.

1. COMMENT: Include a north arrow and scale used on all site sheets.


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp from all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically by PDSD staff.


2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Include a north arrow on all site sheets where it has not been provided.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

4. COMMENT: Clarify if a lot split application has been processed for review and approval through COT PDSD for the proposed lot split. Per my discussion with Steve Shields PDSD Zoning Manager, the applicant was instructed that a land split approval would be required for this proposal.

The legal description in the title block will have to be revised based on the Land Split which will include new legal descriptions.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0257, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

The Land Split application case number will have to be listed next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed.

6. COMMENT: Include the drawing on the cover sheet as required by the standard above.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: Revise zoning notes 4 and 5 as follows; zoning note 4 implies that there is an existing use on the lot that is to be developed. Once the lot is split and recorded there is no use on the new lot. The note can be revised to state "The Allowed Land Uses Allowed is Commercial and Retail Subject to the Bridges Pad 15 Section C.2.1." Zoning note 5 shall be revised to state "The Proposed Use is Automotive Service and Repair - Carwash, Self Service."


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

8. COMMENT: Add a general note that states that "This Project Has Been Designed to Comply with the Setback Requirements of the Major Streets and Routes Plan, UDC Section 5.4".


2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

9. COMMENT: As mentioned above, approval of a lot split application is required. A land division case number will be assigned to the case when the application is processed. List as reference the case number next to the title block of DP sheet.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

10. COMMENT: Clarify if the 6,200 SF includes the overall building areas? If not list the square footage of the buildings accordingly.

Double check the FAR calculation under the standards table on sheet one. I believe the ratio is .065 based on the numbers listed. Revise as required.


2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

11. COMMENT: The site boundary will be checked against the land division documents. Include a copy of the recorded survey with the next DP submittal.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

12. COMMENT: The listed sequence number for the water easement along the south boundary of this new parcel does not match the sequence number listed in the recorded Plat Sequence number 20173560655-1. The sequence number on the plat is 20142341032, P.C.R. Revise as required.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. COMMENT: Verify with TDOT Transportation whether the roadway for Kino Parkway will be widened in the future to meet the future 150 foot roadway cross section. If so draw, dimension and label the curb and sidewalk locations.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

14. COMMENT: Address the standard above on the site sheet(s).


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

15. COMMENT: Label the adjacent zoning classifications on sheet 2; to the east/across the street is R-2, to the north is PAD 15, to the south is PAD 15 and to the west across Kino Pkwy is PAD 15. Label the zoning classifications.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

16. COMMENT: If future roadway widening will be required, assure that the future SVT's are drawn and labeled.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Clarify if the 16-foot one-way drive lane between the building and the north canopy is to be permanently blocked off by the bollards? What is the purpose of the bollards at this location?


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

18. COMMENT: Per the bicycle parking calculations on sheet 1, 2 short and long term spaces are required. Two short term spaces have been provided on the site plan including a detail drawing on sheet 5. The location for the two long term spaces could not be verified on the plans nor could a detail drawing of the proposed facility.

Per the UDC Bicycle parking table, if this carwash use is truly a self-service car wash, no short or long term facilities are required. If the facilities are to be provided indicate the location for the long term and include dimensioned detail drawing of the type of long term facility to be provided. Keep in mind that short term facilities must be within 50 feet of a main public entrance. Label the public entrance on the building(s) other than the Tunnel building.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

19. COMMENT: Label the long building to the west of the Tunnel with the height, SF and use; label the other building west of the Tunnel building with the same information.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

20. COMMENT: Add to keynote 17 on sheet 2 that signage will per permitted under separate sign permits.


21. COMMENT: All new development must be reviewed and approved by the PAD Design Review Committee prior to review by the City of Tucson Development Services Department. Has this project been submitted to the Pad DRC for their review and approval? Submit with the next DP submittal package any documentation from the DRC.


22. COMMENT: This project area is within the Airport Avigation easement. A review by Scott Robidoux Airport Planner is required. Contact PDSD Lead Planners Kelly Lee at Kelly.Lee@tucsonaz.gov or Alexandra.Hines@tucsonaz.gov for more information on the Avigation easement requirements.


23. COMMENT: Clarify if there are vacuum stations proposed for this Car Wash development? If so indicate the locations on the site sheets.

24. COMMENT: On sheet 3, label the cross and horizontal slopes for onsite sidewalk leading to the Kino Parkway street sidewalk.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/16/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of sanitary sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
b. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
c. show the location of all individual components for the disposal system, including any reserve areas and indicate the required separation distances.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11/20/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Drainage Statement:
1. Provide balanced basin detention. The site doesn't meet the criteria of the Detention/Retention Manual Section 2.3. (Page 3 indicates that detention will be waived. The rest of the report seems to provide for detention. Please reconcile the two approaches.)
2. Provide pre-development 2- and 10-year discharges for the project site.
3. On page 110, Existing Conditions Watershed and Floodplain Map, the watercourse is labeled as "Christmas Wash." Please correct the exhibit.
Development Package
4. Add a note to keynote 17 that signs are by separate permit.
5. Show exit route for solid waste service vehicle.
6. Clearly show how rainwater runoff will be directed to landscape water harvesting areas. For example, basin 4.0 has a depth of .99 feet. Show how the area draining into the basin to provide the effective volume.
11/20/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Agency notified for information only.
11/20/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Unified Development Code

4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD-15 document.
Landscape and Screening
Whether or not required by this section, screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street.
Vegetative Ground Cover
Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting.
Vegetation used to meet the screening standards is not included in the ground cover calculation as provided in Section 5-01.5.3, Calculation of Plant Growth Coverage.
Specify the coverage and screening calculations for landscape buffer along Campbell Ave
SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING
The Implementation Plan shall graphically show the following information drawn from tabulated data.
For the WHIA:
Use arrows to show water flow directions within WHIA, including flow direction to show how area is accepting water flow from site.
It appears that the landscape buffer along Campbell Ave is not accepting flow from the site. If not then remove from tabulated data.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
11/20/2018 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change 11/20/18
Pima County Addressing has not received payment for the Addressing Review of DP18-0257 for Mister Car Wash. This review can only be completed by Pima County Addressing after the attached invoice has been paid.
Please let me know if you have any questions.Thank you,

Robin Freiman, Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/20/2018 SBEASLE1 PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP18-0257 Mister Car Wash / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.
The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
11/20/2018 NROSS1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape ArchitectTucson Parks & Recreation(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
12/03/2018 SBEASLE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change 12/03/18

Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0257
Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP - MISTER CAR WASH BRIDGES

The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments about the plans, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by activity number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, please check back later as data flows to PRO at periodic intervals throughout the day.)

Prepare a Comment Response Letter for the reviewers detailing what changes have been made to the plan and what review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, please submit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd:
1) Comment Response Letter
2) Corrected plan set
3) Items requested by review staff
The plans will then re-enter the 20 working day review cycle. Please type the activity number in the Project Description and name the files as described on the PDSD Filedrop web page. The current fee balance is $ 0 (zero).
Elisa Hamblin, copied, is the Project Manager to contact with any questions: 520-837-4966.

Thank you.

Sharon Beasley
City of Tucson
Planning and Development Svcs. Dept.
201 N. Stone Ave, 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
12/03/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Reqs Change Provide a letter from the Bridges Design Review Committee (DRC) that the project has been reviewed and approved by the Bridges PAD DRC.

Alexandra Hines

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/03/2018 SBEASLE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed