Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0244
Parcel: 107020100

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP18-0244
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/09/2018 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
10/23/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (PCWMD 4735-04, 2294.64') is higher than the first floor elevation (2294.25'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
10/26/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Submit NPP plan or Application for exception
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
10/26/2018 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Submit NPP plan or Application for exception.
10/29/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Lead Planner

PROJECT: R & Y Development, 3210 N Freeway Industrial Loop
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0244

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2018
DUE DATE: October 29, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 30, 2019.

1. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. 2-06.4.2.D - Renumber pages in the development package to run sequentially. All pages should be accounted for in the counting (i.e., sheet xx of 11).

3. 2-06.4.4.A - For the project location map on the cover sheet, show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

4. 2-06.4.4.B - On the project location map, identify regional watercourses within the square mile area.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Amend zoning and land use general note 3 to correctly identify the proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. For reference, a list of defined industrial uses can be found in UDC Article 11.3.5.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Include the assigned case number (DP18-0244) in the title block on all sheets.

7. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Provide information for the entire right-of-way width for Freeway Industrial Loop.

8. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Include the adjacent R-1 zoning to the east of the subject property.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. The access lanes on the north and south side of the proposed building do not meet the standard. A one-way access lane or PAAL serving as a fire lane has a minimum width of 20 feet.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide dimensions for the PAAL to the rear of the building.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Clarify how the proposed long-term bicycle parking meets the security standards of UDC Article 7.4.9.D.2. in a general note or site plan note.

12. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Amend zoning and land use general note 8. The required street perimeter yard setback is 20' or 1.5 times the proposed building height. In this case the required setback would be 36'. The required rear perimeter yard setback is 1.5 times the proposed building height, or 36'. Illustrate the required setback lines on the site plan.

13. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

14. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Per UDC Section 7-01.4.1.B. A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. A sidewalk is required adjacent to the proposed access lanes to the north and south of the building.

15. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. Provide detail or dimensions for improvements to the sidewalk on the right-of-way.

16. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/29/2018 EHAMBLI1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments.
10/29/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0244

1) Drainage statement shows the amount of runoff generated by the proposed site development but does not indicate how detention will be implemented to show no adverse impact. Expand the supplied drainage statement to show how the additional runoff will be detained on site so downstream flows are not increased. Coordinate with grading plans
2) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to show the effective ponding area. Include spot grades at all proposed inlets.
3) Water harvesting plans indicate 6" depressed area throughout the entire area of each planter. Sheet 10. Example, water harvesting area 6 uses the entire foot print of the planter X 0.5' depressed area to determine volume. This does not reflect the built condition of the planter area which will have side slopes. Provide a revised set of volumes for all areas based on how the landscape areas will be constructed
4) Pima Associations of Governments "PAG" standard details have been adopted to replace City of Tucson Standard Details. Update notes/details on all sheets to reference the appropriate "PAG" standards. See following link http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/
5) Access lane around building does not meet minimum width requirements for a one way access lane within a storage area, for fire access, or for service vehicles. Width should be 20'. Reference City of Tucson (COT) Unified Development Code (UDC) table 7.4.6.2. Maintain access lane width around trash enclosure (with doors open) as well as between northern most planter area and outside of valley gutter. No parking fire lane signs should be wall mounted or access lane width reduced
6) Show on plans the required maneuvering radius for service vehicles clarifying if a sufficient path of travel around the back corner of the building is provided. Reference COT Technical Standards Manual (TSM) Section 8, Figure 7
7) TSM section 7-01.4.0. Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path. A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane of PAAL on the side where buildings are located

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
10/30/2018 AHINES2 ADA REVIEW Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/31/2018 SVALENZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed