Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0239
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/02/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | 903.2.8 Group R. An automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with section 903.3 shall be provided throughout all buildings with a Group R fire area Please refer to Section 909.2.9 that references sub-sections 907.2.9.2 and 907.2.9.3 for Automatic Smoke Detection system for Group R-2 in Tucson Fire Local Code Amendments |
| 01/23/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Provide the size of the existing water meter; verify that it will be adequate for the proposed development. Reference: Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. 2. Provide the first floor elevation for each building. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. 3. Determine the design daily sewer flow for the development. |
| 01/28/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Section Manager PROJECT: 1621 E. Hendrick Drive Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0239 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 29, 2019 DUE DATE: January 28, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is December 28, 2019. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.2 - It does not appear that the scales are correct. sheets DP-1 & G-1 so the scale at 1" = 20', sheets LS-1 a& LS-2 show 1:10. If 1:10 is really 1" = 10' the plan should be double the size of the plans on DP-1 & G-1. 2. 2-06.3.5 - As this is an electronic submittal remove the Development Package approval stamp from sheets C1, DP-1 & G-1. Sheets LS-1 & LS-2 ensure that a three-inch by five-inch space is provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for the electronic approval stamp. 3. 2-06.3.8 - Relocate the required north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet to the upper right corner of each sheet. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4. 2-06.4.4 - Remove all the parcels from the location map as it is unreadable. 5. 2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area of the location map. 6. 2-06.4.2.C - Label all four corners of the intersections of the section corners. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 7. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - As it does not appear that there are property lines proposed therefor the proposed use should be listed as Multifamily subject to Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .9, & .10. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - As a general note list the total number of units proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of UDC Article 6.4.3. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. 2-06.4.8.B - If applicable show all easement on the plan along with the recordation information. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking calculation references "*PER CITY OF TUCSON UDC, SECTION 7.4.5: MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING SPACES MAY BE REDUCED BY (1) PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY (6) ADDITIONAL SHORT-TERM BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED, UP TO 20% REDUCTION". This statement appears to be in error as no addition short-term bicycle space above the required are provide on site. Plus the vehicle parking space calculation exceeds the required number so a reduction would not be needed. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide the number of accessible vehicle parking spaces required and provided within the vehicle parking calculation. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space on the plan. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The handicapped detail does not match what is proposed on the plan. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - It appears that the post for the accessible sign may encroach into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. Clearly demonstrate on the detail that the pole does not encroach. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The mounting height for the accessible sign should show 7' to the bottom of the van accessible sign. 17. 2-06.4.9.O - The setbacks requirements listed under General Note 24 are not correct. Based on UDC Article 11.3.7.3 the proposed project is considered Multifamily and per UDC Article 6.3.3.C Multifamily is considered a nonresidential use. Per UDC Table 6.3-2.A the required perimeter setbacks for the north, east and west property line should be listed as 10' or ¾ the height of the proposed exterior wall. Based on the heights shown under General Note 25 the minimum perimeter yard setback to the west property line is 17'-3". That said the two (2) northern most buildings are not meeting setbacks. 18. 2-06.4.9.O - There is a reference to "C.O.T. R-2 ZONING SETBACKS 2 10'-0" OR 2/3 HT 14'-10" shown along the east property line. This is not correct and should reference 10'-0" or 3/4 HT 14'-3". 19. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Sections 7-01.3.3.A & 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. If sidewalks are not required within the ROW than the sidewalk will run to the ROW property line. 20. 2-06.4.9.R - Per 2018 IBC Sections 1104.1 & .2 clearly demonstrate on the plan that there is an accessible route between all structures, to all accessible vehicle parking spaces, to at least one of the right-of-ways, etc. that meets the requirements of 2018 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. 21. 2-06.4.9.T - Show the required refuse collection area on the plan. Additional Comments: 22. General Note 19 "DENSITY CALCULATON" is not correct and should meet UDC Article 6.4.7.B.2 23. Sheet C1 remove all reference to the "2012 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC)" as it is not relevant to the development package review. 24. The demolition of the existing structures built in 1933 will require Historic review. 25. Your next submittal should include a development package as a single file multiple page pdf. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/28/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 5' wall is required to screen vehicle use area from adjacent residential zones. A 30" screen is required to screen vehicle use area from Hedrick Dr. Include the following information: Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). The landscape border to the West is an interior buffer on landscape plan it is marked Street Border B. Revise as necessary. 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION 7.7.3. APPLICABILITY. The provisions of this section apply to all development as listed below. A. New Development All new commercial development proposed in the City of Tucson shall comply with the standards of this section. The site is considered a commercial development a NPP plan per SECTION 2-11.0.0: NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS must be submitted. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 01/29/2019 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 01/31/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0239 1) Provide on plans waste stream calculations per City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8-01.8.0 2) Show the designated area adjacent to E Hedrick Dr where the proposed APC will be placed for service. Keynote 26 on sheet DP-1 is missing 3) Pima Associations of Governments "PAG" standard details have been adopted to replace City of Tucson Standard Details. Update notes/details on all sheets to reference the appropriate "PAG" standards. See following link http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 4) Reference City of Tucson (COT) Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management, include all applicable drainage maintenance responsibility notes found in section 14.3 5) Fix sheet numbering. For example sheet C1 is Sheet 1 of 5, Sheet DP-1 is also identified as Sheet 1 of 5 6) Sheet DP-1. Accessible parking sign detail. The 7' to F.G should be to the lowest sign 7) Sheet DP-1. Accessible parking spaces are shown in the detail to have a 4' wide side walk and curb access ramp. The site plan does not show this detail 8) Sheet G1. The property line delineating the R-2 parcel to the east overlaps the numbering of the general paving notes. Correct as needed 9) Sheet DP-1. Keynote 21 is pointing towards an object that isn't shown. Update as needed 10) TSM section 7-01.4.0. Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path. A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane of PAAL on the side where buildings are located. A pedestrian circulation path is also required to connect all buildings to E Hedrick Dr 11) At the northern end of the proposed parking area, the backup spur needs to provide for 3' of vehicle overhang. This 3' of vehicle overhang reduces the available sidewalk width. Reposition sidewalk or backup spur as needed 12) Add note to plans that all curb access ramps/accessible paths are to comply with ICC A117.1. Provide detail on plans for all curb access ramps, including detectable warnings 13) Sheet LS-1. A 4' wide sidewalk is shown along E Hedrick Dr. New proposed sidewalk should be 5'. Reference TSM section 10-01.4.1 14) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to show that an effective ponding depth is maintained. Note that the spot grades should take into account any mulch or ground cover that is used. 15) Change ground cover specification in landscape areas from DG to another material that does not silt and reduce infiltration. Mulch is the preferred alternative 16) Expand drainage statement to show that a 12 hour infiltration draw down time will be maintained for all basins 17) Per Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker for each proposed basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that they can be easily located in the future 18) Drainage report indicates that the proposed development is within the flow shadow of existing buildings to the east. Show this flow shadow and provide supporting calculations showing how it was determined 19) Expand the drainage statement to include a map and narrative of existing flow patterns onto and across the project and the proposed flow patterns. Include any CFS values for any regulatory flow 20) Are the east and west sides of the property being used as channels to direct water to the basin to the north? If so provide a cross section of the proposed channel 21) Provide an inlet detail for the proposed retention area and provide the side slope for the basin 22) It is not clear how ADA access will be provided to the buildings given that the FFE is over 2' above grade in certain locations. Show on plans, by providing running slopes and spot grades, how accessible access is provided 23) Show on plans the proposed grade contours that would be needed to elevate the buildings. 24) Sheet LS-1. Under general notes, ? marks are shown next to numbers. It looks like " were intended. Address as needed. Fix the table in the top left corner 25) A floodplain use permit will be required 26) Additional comments may apply John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 02/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Activity Number: DP18-0239 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING - HEDRICK RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT The review has been completed and a second submittal is required. To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made, submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. Please enter the Activity Number in the Project Description field and name the file as directed, for example, second submittal: 2_Plan_Set.pdf. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set with all documents 3) Items requested by review staff The current fee balance is $0 (zero). Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 12/27/2018 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | **PDF attachment can be viewed on PRO in the "Documents" section** 12/27/18 email: DP18-0239 / Hedrick / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf contains Addressing's comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 12/27/2018 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/01/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |