Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0233
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0233 1) Previous comment 7. Pima County Regional Flood comments a. Show the water surface elevation as shown on the Master Development Plan b. Check discharge pipe hydraulics with tail water justification by Engineer who prepared the drainage report c. The District requests that the pipe outlets and erosion protection remain within the Brake Max boundary. The proposed path seems to be drawn with an additional 3 feet. d. If grading or other portions of the pipe outlets must be placed on District property, then we will require a drainage easement for private maintenance of any improvements within District property. 2) Previous comment 12. Per the State of Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System General Permit (Permit No. AZG2013-001) Section 1.2, this project is part of a common plan which exceeds 1 acre and therefore requires a SWPPP and NOI. Provide SWPPP plans under which this project will operate John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 01/09/2019 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) approves the development plan for Brake Max 16, and per the customer's request, has provided a preliminary electrical design for the project. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 01/11/2019 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 01/11/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plans Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0233 Project Description: E SITE/GRADING- BRAKE MAX 16 The review has been completed and a resubmittal is required. To see review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Prepare a Comment Response Letter detailing changes to the plan and which review comments are being addressed. After the necessary corrections have been made to the plans, go to the PDSD Filedrop web page. Please enter the Activity Number in the “Project Description” field and name the files as directed, for example, 3rd submittal: 3_Plan_Set.pdf Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. The plans will then re-enter a 20-working-day review cycle. 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Corrected plan set with all documents 3) Items requested by review staff The current fee balance is $ 725.90 (see image below). Review fees must be paid prior to the second submittal review. Please include your Activity Number on the checkstub. Loren Makus, copied, is your Project Manager to contact with any questions, email: Loren.Makus@TucsonAz.gov or phone: (520) 837-4927. Thank you. Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 12/04/2018 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/14/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | December 14, 2018 Sharon Beasley City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0233 Brake Max 16 / 2nd Submittal, Received December 4, 2018 Dear Ms. Beasley, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0233, Brake Max 16; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.8 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of Ajo Way and Kino Parkway. The land use is PAD 15 (Planned Area Development 15) with the proposed development being an auto repair business. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the 2nd submittal of the project and has no additional comments to submit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner |
| 12/26/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/27/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/31/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 12/31/2018 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Principal Planner PROJECT: Brake Max, 1670 E Tucson Marketplace Drive Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0233 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 31, 2018 DUE DATE: January 2, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 19, 2019. 1. Previous comment 1. General comment: It appears this proposal includes a lot split for subject parcel. A lot split is a separate application that must be processed and approved prior to approval of the development package. The review comments contained in this transmittal are subject to modification based on the final approved lot split. See also comment 5 this transmittal. 2. Previous comment 4 not fully addressed. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. Sheets 6-8 do not meet placement standards. Verify the scale is accurate and consistent with sheets 1-5. 3. Previous comment 5 not fully addressed. 2-06.4.3 - The title block must include the administrative street address for the project site on all sheets. Sheets 6-8 do not include the administrative address. 4. Previous comment 9 not fully addressed. 2-06.4.6 - As the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the entire PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. Only a portion of the PAD has been included on the cover sheet. Include the portion of the PAD to the east of Park Av. 5. Previous comment 12 not addressed. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. Land splits require a separate permit and review. Documentation for the approved land split must be provided with the DP submittal. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide dimensions for the area between the southern parking spaces and the sidewalk area. A minimum of 2.5' overhang area must be provided to ensure vehicles do not impede the pedestrian area. 7. Previous comment 18 not addressed. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Correct accessible parking space calculations provided in the running tables on sheet 4. Accessible vehicle parking for Costco should be 34 spaces provided. Existing total to date should be 77 required and 100 provided. Revised total to date should be 78 required and 101 provided. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Correct location of short-term bicycle parking illustrated on sheet 2. The location and alignment should match detail 8 on sheet 4. 9. Previous comment 21 not addressed. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 10. Previous comments 25 and 26 not fully addressed. Correct functional open space calculation in general note 11 on sheet 1. Required open space is 1,752 sf. Correct running table on sheet 5. Open space requirements for this project should list "5% of 35,048 sf". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/11/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |