Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0233
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/21/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/21/2018 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing will not need to review this project. Thank you Nicholas Jordan Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 10/03/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Facilities Map located in PRO under documents. October 1, 2018 WO# 6247798 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov Dear Kelly SUBJECT: Brake Max 16 1670 E Tucson Marketplace Blvd. DP18-0233 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and not approved the development plan. Please resubmit for approval. Existing facilities are not in conflict, but proposed source of power on development plans is not available. Source of power will need to be from another location. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Martin Rodriguez @ 917-8787. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant Design |
| 10/03/2018 | NROSS1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | October 2, 2018 Kelly Lee Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0233 Brake Max 16 / 1st Submittal, Received September 21, 2018 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0233, Brake Max 16; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.8 acre site, located northwest of the intersection of Ajo Way and Kino Parkway. The land use is PAD 15 (Planned Area Development 15) with the proposed development being an auto repair business. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following conditions of approval, as noted below. These conditions shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Condition of approval: 1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 10/12/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant reviews or modifications that affect the site. Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD-15. C.2 LAND USE REGULATIONS C.3 Landscape and Screening Requirements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/12/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 10/15/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. The development will have no impacts to any nearby ADOT facilities. Thank you |
| 10/16/2018 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/17/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2497.51) is higher than the first floor elevation (2496.90). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 10/18/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0233 1) Sheet 2. There arrow in the basin that says" EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM PER NOTE #4". Note 4 cannot be located please provide reference as needed. 2) Sheet 2. Various dimensions are missing dimension lines and arrows. Provide dimension lines and arrows as needed. Parking space depth and overall width for example. 3) Show how the proposed plan is in compliance with COT Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.6.6.C. Particularly the grading of the vehicular use areas should be in such a manner that runoff is directed into landscaped areas. Curb cuts should be provided at optimal locations to allow runoff to enter landscaped areas. Available landscape area should be depressed up to 6" to maximize water harvesting 4) Provide top/bottom spot grades for all proposed water harvesting areas to ensure that a consistent ponding depth is maintained throughout. Include spot grades at all proposed inlets. 5) Entrance/concrete pad for dumpster slopes away from the enclosure at a 2% grade this conflicts with inlet for water harvesting. Revise inlet location as needed 6) Provide details and specification for discharge pipe inlet and outlet structure. Include depth and slope of pipe 7) Provide a drainage statement showing how the proposed development is in keeping with the overall design for the Bridges Planned Area Development (PAD). Include a comparison of pre/post discharges rates and capacities of existing infrastructure. Note that once required information is provided Pima County Regional Flood Control will conduct a review of the proposed development within the regional basin 8) Provide a pedestrian connection between the multi-use path and the proposed development. Reference the Bridges PAD page 87 section C.2.4 9) Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path per COT Technical Standard Manual (TSM) section 7-01.3.3.B, includes a path to the proposed trash enclosures 10) Proposed pedestrian circulation path to the west which crosses the PAAL runs behind a parking space. Adjust position of path as needed to eliminate this conflict 11) Sheet 3. Keynote 9 points to the discharge pipe but references the dumpster enclosure. Update as needed 12) Provide on plans the SWPPP permit number under which the proposed development will operate 13) Existing development within the Bridges PAD shows curb access ramps with detectable warnings. Update curb access ramp detail to include detectable warnings 14) Sheet 7. Landscaping adjacent to accessible parking appears to interfere with the required 2.5' vehicle overhang for the parking space. Adjust landscaping placement as needed 15) Sheet 7. Landscaping adjacent to dumpster enclosure and maneuvering area appears to interfere with the vertical clearance requirements for service vehicles. Adjust landscaping placement as needed. 16) Provide grading cut/fill cubic yard quantities on plans John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 10/19/2018 | NROSS1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | The City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department has no comments or concerns regarding this development and recommends approval. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/19/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 10/19/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Brake Max, 1670 E Tucson Marketplace Drive Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0233 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 18, 2018 DUE DATE: October 18, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 19, 2019. 1. General comment: It appears this proposal includes a lot split for subject parcel. A lot split is a separate application that must be processed and approved prior to approval of the development package. The review comments contained in this transmittal are subject to modification based on the final approved lot split. 2. General comment: The running tables on sheet 4 must include the development to date for the entire PAD. See DP18-0104 for most recent information. 3. 2-06.3.4 - Correct typo in the title block, "Aeridian" should read "Meridian". 4. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 5. 2-06.4.3 - The title block must include the administrative street address for the project site on all sheets. 6. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map must include a scale and be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile. 7. 2-06.4.4.A - The project location map must accurately locate the project site. As illustrated, the project location is shown as centered within the Bridges PAD and not on the actual subject parcel. 8. 2-06.4.4.B - The project location map must identify all streets that abut the subject property. 9. 2-06.4.6 - As the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the entire PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. Only a portion of the PAD has been included on the cover sheet. Remove reference to "subdivision site plan" and "minor lot split of block 9". 10. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Once the lot split application has been approved, provide the relevant application case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. 11. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 12. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. Land splits require a separate permit and review. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide PAAL dimensions for the entirety of the site, specifically the southern portion of the site. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide dimensions for parking spaces located on the southern portion of the site. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Correct parking space calculations provided in the running tables on sheet 4. Vehicle parking for Planet Fitness should be 174 spaces provided. Existing total to date (provided) should be 3,084. Revised total to date (provided) should be 3,109. Remove second line under the revised total to date. This appears to be a duplicate entry from the theater parking totals. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Correct accessible parking space calculations provided in the running tables on sheet 4. Accessible vehicle parking for Costco should be 34 spaces provided. Existing total to date should be 78 required and 100. Revised total to date (provided) should be 101. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Correct bicycle parking calculations provided in the running tables on sheet 4. Bicycle parking for Wal-Mart should be 19 spaces (required). Existing total to date (required) should be 75. Existing total to date (provided) should be 131. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Clarify whether a total of 6 or 4 bicycle parking spaces are being provided with this development. Sheet 1, general note 9 lists a total of 6, as does the site plan on sheet 2. The running table on sheet 4 lists a total of 4 bicycle parking spaces required and provided. Correct revised total to date per this comment and previous comment outlining corrections. 21. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 22. 2-06.4.9.Q - Clarify the proposed building height. General note 7 on sheet 1 lists a max building height of 26.4'. Max building height listed inside the building footprint on various sheets range from 23.5' to 27.33'. Correct and consistently note across all sheets. 23. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. Provide dimensions for all pedestrian circulation areas surrounding the building and at narrowest width. 24. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 25. General comment: Clarify and correct functional open space provided. Sheet 1, general note 11 lists 1,739 sf required and 3,266 provided. Functional open space is the area shown as 12' multi-use asphalt path. Other landscaped areas on the site do not contribute to functional open space. The running table on sheet 4 lists 1,740 sf provided. The 12' x 166' asphalt path would be a total of 1,992 sf. 26. General comment: Correct functional open space calculations provided on sheet 4. DP15-0039 should have 8,712 sf provided. Revise total per this comment and previous comment. 27. General comment: Correct case numbers identified on sheet 4. Cases listed as C09-0010, C11-0001 and C12-0113 should all begin with a "D" rather than a "C". 28. General comment: Correct typo on cover sheet in "landscape architect". If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 10/24/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Andy: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please pay review fees and resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
| 10/24/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP18-0233 Brakemax 16 at the Bridges 10/24/2018 () Final Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) Denied () Rezoning history on site () Annexation history on site () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: KL DATE: 10/24/2018 COMMENTS: Provide a letter from the Bridges Design Review Committee (DRC) that the project has been review and approved by the Bridges PAD DRC |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/28/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |