Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0213
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/20/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Alta Linda at Starr Pass - Grading Plan Development Package (1st Review) 20 lot FLD development DP18-0213 - Related to DP18-0020 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 20, 2018 DUE DATE: September 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 29, 2019. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the registrant's information on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0213, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. List the administrative Street Address next to the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 3. COMMENT: If applicable indicate on the plan by general the lot numbers affected by the HDZ overlay. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/28/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 5.2. HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT ZONE (HDZ) Add the following notes to grading plans: Vegetation Retention and Revegetation a. Vegetation Retention (1) Existing viable and transplantable trees with four inch or greater trunk diameter and cacti shall be preserved in their original locations, except for building sites and access and utilities serving building sites. (2) When retention of the above trees and cacti in their original locations is not possible due to building site location, the trees and cacti shall be salvaged and replanted in areas requiring revegetation, whenever possible. b. Revegetation All cut or fill slopes that are no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical and all utility trenches or septic leaching fields that are not located in parking or driveway areas shall be revegetated in compliance with the following standards: (1) All plants used in revegetation shall be the same as the native vegetation on the site prior to grading or clearing or any adjacent site; and, (2) Revegetation shall be accomplished with the following minimum standards for plants: (a) Desert trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size with a minimum trunk diameter of two inches measured at the soil level, or large specimen cactus shall be placed at the same vegetation density found on the site prior to any clearing, grubbing, or grading; and, (b) Seeds for trees, desert shrubs, and grasses shall be planted with a density adequate to control erosion and may use one of the following methods of planting: Raked into the soil with appropriate mulch materials; hydroseeding; anchored mulches; or established on jute, rolled straw, or similar material. Another method may be approved by PDSD. (3) A temporary watering system shall be installed until the revegetation materials are established. 3. Slope Stabilization All slopes steeper than a ratio of three horizontal to one vertical, with the exception of retaining walls, shall be stabilized with properly engineered stone riprapping or sculptured rock as follows: a. Stone riprapping shall be hand-placed on the slope; b. The stabilizing material used shall blend with the natural appearance of the site or lot and the surrounding terrain; and, c. Vegetation retention and revegetation should be used in conjunction with riprapping. C. Color All exposed exterior walls and roofs of structures, retaining walls, and accessory structures, except satellite dishes, shall be earth tone in color and shall blend with the predominant natural colors found on the lot or parcel. Satellite dishes may be black. White is not permitted. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 10/01/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0213 1) Per City of Tucson Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.7.B add the required hold harmless note 2) The proposed grading plan does not match DP18-0020. For example the finished grade on PAD 1 is approximately 4' lower than what is shown in the Tentative Plat DP18-0020. Please clarify this and other substantial differences in pad elevations. Provide an updated Tentative Plat prior to building permit issuance 3) Update related case DP18-020 to read DP18-0020 4) Sheet 1 Grading Note 3. Update to include reference to the geotechnical report for the project. Provide a copy of the geotechnical report for review on next submittal John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: dp18-0213 This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Revised Plan Set 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: Example 2 (second submittal): 2_plan_set.pdf 2_soils_report.pdf Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/06/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |