Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0207
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2020 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case #’s DP18-0207, C10-19-05, and T19SA00034 on each sheet. Indicate date of approval of variance. |
| 06/29/2020 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/29/2020 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Principal Planner PROJECT: Babylon Market, 3954 E Speedway Blvd Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0207 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 26, 2020 DUE DATE: June 29, 2020 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 31, 2021. 1. General comment: It appears the resubmitted Development Package is the same version that was previously submitted in 2018. As such, all zoning comments still apply and must be addressed. Minor updates have been provided to the following comments, but the bulk remain the same. 2. General comment: As the proposed expansion to this site constitutes a more than 25% increase in gross floor area, the site will need to meet current code standards for parking, landscaping, pedestrian circulation and accessibility. It is noted a variance (T19SA00034) has been granted for landscaping standards and an Individual Parking Plan (T18SA00422) has been granted for the required number of parking spaces. The previously approved DDO (T18SA00449) regarding reduced setbacks has expired. 3. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 4. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 5. 2-06.4.3 – Provide the related Variance case number (T19SA0034) and Individual Parking Plan case number (T18SA00422) adjacent to the title block. If a new DDO is approved, provide relevant case number as well. 6. 2-06.4.4.A – On the project location map, show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area. 7. 2-06.4.4.B – On the project location map, identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. Text is illegible at the scale provided. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. The use for all structures on the site is Retail – Food and Beverage Sales, if the prepared food bought on site is for take-out only. Interior or exterior seating for food consumption is not permitted. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a general note, provide information on the two additional special applications. Include a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 10. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c – The latest aerial imagery shows an additional awning structure on the northwest corner of the site. Verify this building has not been omitted from the site plan and building area expansion calculations. Amend the building area expansion calculations in general note 3. Additionally, the use for all square footage is Retail – Food and Beverage Sales. 11. 2-06.4.8.B – Verify all existing easements are drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 12. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks has not been provided. Correct driveway and curb cuts shown on Longfellow Ave. 13. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Add zoning boundaries to the site plan. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide dimensions for all parking and vehicle use areas. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a – Amend general note 6. All square footage on the site is classified as Retail – Food and Beverage Sales. The parking requirement is 1 space per 300 sf, or a total of 12 spaces for this site. Per Mark Castro, the previously approved Individual Parking Plan (IPP) will be adequate for the proposed parking allocation. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. A minimum of 2 short-term and 2 long-term bicycle parking spaces are required. 20. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 21. 2-06.4.9.L – Verify there are no proposed easements to be added to the site. All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 22. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Include setback lines on the site plan. Include dimensions for building locations. Correct general note 5 and reference to Swan Road. 23. 2-06.4.9.O – The proposed extension to the masonry wall and the location of the southwest walk in cooler do not meet setback standards. Design Development Option (DDO) approval will be required for the proposed changes. The required south setback is 1 ½ times the height of the structure. 24. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). The height of all new structures must be provided. 25. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 26. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 27. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 28. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/29/2020 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0207 1) Previous Comment 1: Per City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 10-01.4.1. Provide a minimum 5' wide sidewalk along N Longfellow Av. Additional comment, this includes a curb access ramp at Longfellow Av and the 15' alley. Sidewalk to meet Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard detail 200. Provide dimensions/cross slopes for the existing sidewalk along E Speedway Bl to ensure compliance 2) Previous Comment 2: Provide new driveway aprons for the driveways along N Long Fellow Av per PAG standard detail 206 3) Previous Comment 3: Provide curb along N Long Fellow Av per PAG standard detail 209 4) Previous Comment 4 : Provide a compliant curb access ramp on the corner of N Long Fellow Av and E Speedway Bl 5) Previous Comment 5: Per COT Unified Development Code (UDC) section 7.4.6.K an alley cannot be used for access. Provide a barrier, such as a wall or curb to prevent vehicles from entering the property via the alley 6) Previous Comment 6: Provide a motor vehicle used area in accordance with UDC section 7.4.6. Provide dimensions for all parking spaces, including accessible parking and loading area. Provide dimension for all drives and driveways. Minimum width for a two-way PAAL is 24' 7) Previous Comment 7: The current driveway apron off of E Speedway Bl cannot be used for access in its current condition. Remove and replace the apron with a minimum 6' wide sidewalk or provide a compliant curb return entry according to TSM section 10-01.3.2.C. Sufficient onsite vehicle maneuvering must be provided 8) Previous Comment 8: Per COT Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.9.H.2, show on plans site visibility triangles (SVT's) at each proposed driveway along N Long Fellow Av and E Speedway Bl 9) Previous Comment 9: Provide a plan set that meets application submittal requirements of the AM section 2-06. Provide all applicable information regarding existing site conditions, topography, within 50' of the property boundary. Include all standard applicable notes 10) Previous Comment 11: Provide a trash enclosure detail to meet TSM section 8-01.9.0 11) Previous Comment 12: Provide on plans waste stream calculations per TSM section 8-01.8.0 12) Previous Comment 13: Project site is impacted by the COT Alvernon Wash flood hazard area, a Flood Plain use Permit will be required for the development work which will be issued when the review is completed 13) Previous Comment 15: Provide a complete pedestrian circulation path according to TSM section 7. Provide a pedestrian path linking the development for N Longfellow Av. Provide cross slopes and running slopes for all new/existing sidewalks 14) Previous Comment 16: Show on plans that any roof drains (downspouts) scupper underneath sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Reference TSM section 7-01.4.1.E 15) Show the existing wheel stops to make sure that a 2.5' vehicle overhang a minimum 4' pedestrian path in front of the building is maintained 16) T18SA00499, DDO setback and height is expired. Please include all applicable case numbers on the plan set. T19SA00034, T18SA00422. 17) Pending responses additional comments may apply John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/29/2020 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The development package will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide Case #’s DP18-0207, C10-19-05, and T19SA00034 on each sheet. Indicate date of approval of variance. |
| 06/29/2020 | SSHIELD1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Site Section Manager PROJECT: Babylon Market Development Package (3rd Review) DP18-0207 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 29, 2020 DUE DATE: June 29, 2020 ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0201 & the Board of Adjustment (B of A) case number, T19SA00034, adjacent to the title block in the lower right hand corner of all sheets. List all conditions required by the B of A on the landscape plans. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDSLANDSCAPE STANDARDS 7.6.4.2 LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Street Landscape Borders The following comments were not addressed. 7.6.4.3 Interior Landscape Borders Interior landscape borders are required as a buffer and visual transition along the common property lines between adjacent land uses and zones as follows, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.C.4, Exceptions to the Landscape Border Standards. a. Interior landscape borders are required as determined in Table 7.6.4-1, which ranks land uses and zones based upon their land use intensity and the impact a use will have on adjacent land uses. Commercial Zones adjacent to residential properties require interior landscape buffers per TABLE 7.6.4-1. None is provided. 4 trees would be required. b. The minimum required width of an interior landscape border is the lesser of ten feet or the width of the building setback required by the UDC for the proposed building or use. c. Where motor vehicle parking spaces or parking area access lanes (PAALs) are located next to the property line or where the interior landscape border conflicts with a utility easement, an interior landscape border is not be required if all of the following requirements are met: (1) An equivalent number of trees are planted elsewhere on the site between the building(s) and the property line, or if the use on the site does not include buildings, the required canopy trees are located between the principal use and the property line; (2) The trees are evenly distributed over the site; and (3) The minimum planting area required in Section 7.6.4.B.3, Planter Area, is provided for each canopy tree . 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS The following comments were not addressed. A. When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. 30" screen would be required to screen Vehicle Use Area from Speedway Blvd and Longfellow Ave. A 5' wall ( All walls required by this section must be of masonry material or masonry with a stucco or textured finish) per Table 7.6.4-1 is required to screen Vehicle Use Area adjacent residential zoned properties to the south. The following comments were not addressed. The following information must be provided on the plans per 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). No screening is identified on landscape plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/09/2020 | JOE LINVILLE | COT NON-DSD | LANDSCAPE | Reqs Change | Ensure that all Zoning comments are addressed, |
| 07/10/2020 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE Your Next Step: 1. Payment 2. Resubmittal of documents DESCRIPTION: SITE - Babylon Market, addition. PERMIT/ACTIVITY: DP18-0207 PROJECT MANAGER: Alexandra.Hines@TucsonAz.gov FEES DUE: $ 1,041.50 Please pay the total fees (or at a minimum, the REVIEW Fees). A payment is required before your next submittal. ONLINE PAYMENTS https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd NOTE: It may take 1-2 days for the full fee amount to show online. Wait for full amount before paying. Visa, MC, Discover, American Express or pay by checking account 1- Click blue tab: Pay Permit Fees 2- Enter your Permit Nbr, example: dp20-0000 (not case-sensitive but a hyphen-dash- is needed) 3- Business/Individual Name: Leave blank 4- Click the blue tab: Continue 5- If any issues, try using the browser Internet Explorer SEE REVIEW COMMENTS and your submitted documents on PRO: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro YOUR NEXT STEP: Submit documents to the Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd FOR FASTER PROCESSING, when on the Filedrop page, select the box "Development Package or Land Division". This applies to all DP submittals, DP resubmittals, and DP revisions - and all Land Splits. (For Building Permits, continue to select "Resubmittals/Revisions...".) 1) Comment Response Letter 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set, even if no changes were made) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff - Name the 4th submittal documents starting with the submittal number, for example: 4_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services email: COTDSDPermits@TucsonAz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/10/2020 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |