Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0201
Parcel: 113040380

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0201
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/24/2018 NROSS1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/27/2018 NROSS1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved July 18, 2018
Cypress Civil Development, LLC
2030 E. Speedway Blvd, Ste.110
Tucson, AZ 85719
Attn: Theresa Hadley
SUBJECT: Water Availability for Project: 3401 N. Fremont Ave, APN: 11304039B, 113040380, 11304269E, 113042700,Case #: WA2542, T-13 R-14 S-30, Lots: 9999, Location Code: TUC , Total Area: 6.31 , Zoning: R-2
WATER SUPPLY
Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designated from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project.
WATER SERVICE
The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas.
Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs.
This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance.
Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development.
If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718.
Sincerely,


Richard A. Sarti, P.E.
Engineering Manager
Tucson Water Department
RS:ka
CC:S:\Newarea\CommittedDemand\WAL - Parcels\11304039B.docx
08/28/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/10/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.





Howard B. Dutt, RLA

Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
09/13/2018 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change DP18-0201 Mountain Enclave/ 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

Please see the attached pdf with Addressing’s comments.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570
09/14/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/14/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/14/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/18/2018 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
09/18/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Mountain Clave Lots 1-76 & Common Areas A, B, C
Development Package (1st Review) FLD Development
DP18-0201- R-2 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 12, 2018
DUE DATE: September 21, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 17, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

1. COMMENT: On the sheet 2 symbols legend, include the symbol used for defining the common areas.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0201, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

3. COMMENT: Label on the location map, the streets that abut the proposed development. Label the street names, Halcyon Rd, Fremont Rd, Haven Ln.


2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

4. COMMENT: Include in the lot area table or a separate matrix table the square footage of each unit proposed for each lot.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

5. COMMENT: In order to verify that the allowed and proposed site coverage, the square footage of the SFR and vehicular use areas on each lot must be listed in a table if they are all different or as a general note if the sf footages are the same. This project appears to be designed as a cookie cutter development with the same building footprint, lot size etc. Provide the information as a general note or in a table.

FLD's have a site coverage requirement not a lot coverage requirement. Under the site Coverage text block, revise the lot coverage proposed and allowed to state site Coverage Allowed and Proposed.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

6. COMMENT: On sheet 11, L208 does not appear to be pointing to the correct line or the line itself has blended in with the line along the northwest corner of lot 29; correct as required.

On sheet 11, it is not very clear what line L322 is pointing to. Perhaps a blow-up detail would make it clear.


2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way.

7. COMMENT: For consistency, provide the hatching for all common areas.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

8. COMMENT: The street cross section does not meet the minimum requirement and must be approved as proposed through a Technical Standard Modification Review. The TSMR request will have to be for the width of the ROW, pavement width, sidewalk width and locations, no on-street parking, 90 degree parking off a street, and backing out onto the street. Review the Technical Standards for the specific section(s) to be modified. Street standards are in TS Section 10 pedestrian circulation is in TS Section 7.

Sidewalks must be a minimum of 5 feet in width and provided along the street frontage. It is clear that the sidewalks are not proposed along the street frontages and are not 5 feet wide. A TSMR will also be required for the proposed sidewalk locations and proposed width.

Once the TSMR is approved, list the case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. The TSMR must also be listed as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval and standards modified through the TSMR process. If applicable, any conditions of approval of the TSMR must also be listed.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

9. COMMENT: Add a detail drawing depicting the visitor parking spaces with dimensions. The detail drawing shall also include the sidewalk in front of the parking spaces.

All the parking spaces must be designed with wheel stops 2.5 feet from the front of the 18 foot parking space to prevent a vehicle from overhanging onto the sidewalk area or the sidewalks must be widened to 7.5 feet which allows for a 2.5 foot overhang and a clear 5 foot sidewalk.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

10. COMMENT: Label the north building setbacks for lots 67 - 76.

Include the building setbacks from the interior street back of curb to the buildings. The ADT of this project is 140 to 1,000. The minimum building setback is the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the structure wall (height measured from design grade) facing the street measured from the nearest edge of travel lane. It does not appear that the street building setbacks can be met with this design. Variances for the street building setbacks for each unit will be required; UDC Section 8.7.3.L.2 - The street setback may be administratively reduced by the PDSD Director based on a finding that the reduced setback enhances the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and a transportation statement is approved by the City's Traffic Engineering division. A street perimeter yard reduction request is considered for approval concurrent with the processing of the plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. (Contact Steve Shields for information on the PDSD Director Administrative Reduction process.)

Include lot detail drawings that provide the proposed street building setbacks based on the proposed design. 2 or more lot detail drawings may be required to provide the information requested.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

11. COMMENT: On sheet 4, label the horizontal slope of the sidewalks based on the proposed grades.
Maximum horizontal slope is 5%.

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

12. COMMENT: If required by Transportation show required street sidewalks along the Haven Lane and Halcyon Road street frontage that abut this development.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

13. COMMENT: Per general note 17 on sheet 1, grouped mailboxes will be provided for this development. Show the locations of the gang mailboxes and assure that the locations are accessed from the pedestrian sidewalk areas.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

14. COMMENT: If the standard above is applicable, show the locations of any free standing monument signs and add a general note that any signage will be permitted under separate permit.


2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)


15. COMMENT: Add the missing information related to the FLD standards below. The FLD information should be listed together on the cover sheet.

2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and,

16. COMMENT: Add the note on the cover sheet.


2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint).

17. COMMENT: Add the note on the cover sheet.


2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3.A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

18. COMMENT: Provide lot detail drawings with setbacks.


2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

19. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.

2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space
Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations;

20. COMMENT: The proposed FOS areas are to be reviewed by the design professional for compliance. (Add the word "Functional" under the FOS heading/calculation text block.)


2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

21. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan
When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows:

22. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and,

23. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.

24. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan
When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:

2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation;

25. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

26. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

27. COMMENT: To be reviewed by the design professional for compliance.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/18/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)
Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements:

1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.

2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:
a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,
b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.

Provide tree calculation if not providing trees for pedestrian circulation.

3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual.
4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section.

Show by detail how Water Harvesting is achieved.

5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.

Verify screening is not required for mechanical equipment.

6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

Identify any perimeter screening and materials used on the landscape plan.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
09/20/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change September 20, 2018
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0201
PROJECT NAME: Mountain Enclave
PROJECT ADDRESS: 3401 N Fremont Ave
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development Package

1. A private improvement agreement for offsite improvements along Fremont Ave (up to 3400 E Greenly Place), and Halcyon Rd. will be required.

2. Fremont Ave - Add two travel lanes curb, and sidewalk on west side of road. New driveways for existing property fronting Fremont.

3. Halcyon - Remove and replace existing speed hump, add sidewalk along frontage of proposed new development.

4. Show these requiremts on plan.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
09/24/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Each occupiable building shall have an independent connection to the public sewer; correct the building sewers from lots 28 and 29. Reference: Section 701.3, IPC 2012.
09/26/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change ***See attachment in documents table on PRO.***

Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the development plan submitted on August 24, 2018, and is unable to approve the plan at this time. In our meeting with the developer on July 19, 2018, we confirmed that TEP easements will need to meet our size standard of 10’ x 10’ for transformers and pedestals. Utility Keynotes on the plat indicate 10’ x 7’ electrical easements, which need to be corrected. The final location of these easements will be determined by TEP’s electrical design.

Please add in the General Notes that there is a TEP Blanket Easement – Book 95, Page 352 – that affects Parcel 4, and a TEP Blanket Easement - Book 102, Page 78 that affects Parcel 1.

There is also a TEP easement – Bk 237, Pg 347 along the north 5 feet of Parcel 4; please identify on the plans.

TEP easement – Book 3442, Page 55 is incorrectly shown on Sheet 9. The easement does not extend southerly along Parcel 4. TEP has no facilities along the southeastern property line of Parcel 4 as shown on the plat; they may be communication facilities.

There are potential conflicts with existing overhead facilities. Costs for removal or relocation of existing facilities are billable to the developer.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-947-8744.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent III
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources – RC 131
3950 E. Irvington Road
Tucson, AZ 85714-2114
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
09/27/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0201
SWPPP
1. Provide the correct contact information for requesting an inspection. The IVR number is 520.791.3111. The Engineering Section should be contacted through department reception at 520.837.4991. Online inspection requests are made through Velocity Hall at https://www.velocityhall.com/accela/velohall/index.cfm?city=TUCSON&state=ARIZONA.
2. Ensure the concrete washout complies with Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-B301.
Drainage report
3. Per the October 24, 1997 Memorandum from City Engineer G. Dewayne Tripp, PE, and adopted into the standards manual, the project must provide a 15 per cent reduction in the 2-, 10-, and 100-year peak discharges. Revise the drainage design to provide this reduction.
4. Describe the nature of the existing discharge toward the cul-de-sac area of Holaway Drive. Is the existing discharge concentrated or dispersed? The standards manual requires the discharge to be the same in the developed state.
5. Provide infiltration test results for Basin A. Use of a sump pump instead of infiltration for disposal from Basin A will require a TSMR.
6. Provide dimensioned details for basins and other drainage features in the drainage report.
7. Provide sufficient detail in the drainage report to show the basins are designed as functional open space to the maximum extent possible.
Development Package/Tentative Plat
8. Grading note 18 indicates that landscape areas will be depressed a maximum of 6 inches, the Drainage Report indicates that water-harvesting basins will provide retention and have depths greater than 6 inches. Reconcile the various parts of the submittal.
9. In the survey notes, indicate the Township Range and Section for the referenced basis of bearing.
10. Provide parking blocks to prevent parked vehicles from extending over sidewalks or landscape areas.
11. A TSMR will be required for alternative street sections. (TSM 10-01.2.1.B and TSM 10-01.2.3.A.1)
12. It is not clear that water harvesting will be maximized (UDC 7.6.6.C.2) Discuss in drainage report and clearly show on the plans.
13. Show how the basins are designed as functional open space to the greatest degree practicable using the multiple-use concepts in chapter IV of the Stormwater Detention Retention Manual. (UDC 8.7.3.G)
14. Note that since these comments may affect project design, additional comments should be expected on the next review.
09/27/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: 20 Sep 2018
FROM: Richard Fe Tom, AIA, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
TO: Kelly Lee, Planning and Development Services Department

RE: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review of
DP18-0201 Mountain Enclave FLD per design Criteria of UDC Section 8.7.3 M

The following review comments are provided to detail the changes required on the plans and documents submitted to PDSD prior to the Design professional recommending approval of this project.
The review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3 M: Design Criteria

Design Criteria

1. Architectural Variation

a. COMMENT: Provide additional building elevations of the East and West facades of all proposed units.

b. COMMENT: Provide proposed floor plans of each type of unit identifying locations of garages, front living areas, porches, balconies, door openings and window openings.

2. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties

Transition Edge Treatment (UDC Section 8.7.3.m.2.a):

a. COMMENT: Provide as part of the Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) a drawing or copy of the Landscape Plan indicating the type(s)and locations of buffering to be provided in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential developments adjacent to the FLD site. (Examples include but are not limited to landscape screening, opaque fences or walls)

Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) (UDC Section 8.7.3.m.2.b):

b. COMMENT: Provide as part of the Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) a site plan showing the lot numbers for each building and identify which lots must provide privacy mitigation. The site plan shall indicate the locations of each type of residential development adjacent to the FLD site as indicated on the PMP Existing Photo Index of the current PMP.

3. Solar Access and Passive Solar

Solar Considerations (UDC Section 7.3):

a. COMMENT: Indicate in the PMP or AVP Plan how this FLD project has been designed in compliance with UDC Section 7.3 "Solar Considerations" to allow the use of solar energy collectors (UDC Section 7.3.1) and indicate what measures have been taken to minimize the adverse effects of shadows cast from any proposed multistory structure (UDC Section 7.3.2).

4. Alternative Compliance.

No Comment. No Alternative Compliance requests have been submitted.

End of Review
09/28/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0201Project Description: E PLAT/FLD - MOUNTAIN ENCLAVE
To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan.
This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff
Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf
Alexandra Hines, AICP
Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson
201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/28/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed