Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0195
Parcel: 123020860

Address:
2502 E GRANT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0195
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/14/2018 NROSS1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
08/16/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Unable to locate a fire spinkler supply line. Food service (A-2 occupancy) with an occupant load greater than 100 will require fire sprinklers. Please confirm if fire sprinklers are intended, and, if so, location of underground piping.
09/05/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
09/05/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 2502 E Grant Road - Food Service and Retail Uses
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0195 - C-1 and C-2 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 4, 2018
DUE DATE: September 10, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 10, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section MS&R adjustment may not be used when the site is part of a rezoning 5.4.5.D.1.b


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

1. COMMENT: Assure that title block information on the landscape sheets matches the information in the title block of the civil sheets.


2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

2. COMMENT: Clarify, what is the project name.


2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

3. COMMENT: Assure that the legal description listed in the title block of the civil sheets is also listed on the landscape and irrigation sheets.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0195, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List the rezoning case number next to the title block of the landscape and Irrigation sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

5. COMMENT: All the lot lines and M/P subdivision numbers are not required on the DP location map.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.


2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____."

6. COMMENT: The southern portion of the overall site is subject to compliance with conditions of rezoning case number C9-90-12. Condition 1.A limits the height of the building within the rezoned parcel to 17 feet. It is not clear on the DP what the actual height of the building is within the rezoned parcel. Include as reference with the next DP submittal, a preliminary drawing of the building elevations that include building heights from design grade.


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

7. COMMENT: Prior to approval of the DP, a Pima County Tax Parcel Combination of all parcels into one Tax Parcel will be required.


2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

8. COMMENT: As also noted in comment 4 above, list the rezoning case number as a reference number next to the title block of the landscape and Irrigation sheets.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

9. COMMENT: Revise the use specific standard 4.3.4.M.1 to 4.9.4.M.1 next to the C-2 zoning note 6 under the Zoning and Land Use Notes section.

The existing development also includes a Communication Use that needs to be listed under note 6 and shall include the applicable use specific standards as well as the approved SE application case number. Review the SE application and approved documents for the Cell Tower use and include any associated parking required for the Cell Tower.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

10. COMMENT: It is not very clear on sheet two that the future right of way information is correct. The future curb location must be drawn and dimensioned based on the MS&R technical Standards cross section unless the ongoing grant road alignment and design for this phase is different than what is in the Technical Standards Section 10. The future curb and sidewalk along the Grant Road and Tucson Boulevard frontage must be drawn and labeled.

(The street building setbacks are to be measured from the future back of curb locations.)


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

11. COMMENT: Revise the square footage of the north Food Service area to 4,026. (Clarify if the building dimensions labeled on sheet 2 are taken from inside the building or from the outside walls. For zoning purposes the square footages are based on the outside wall dimensions.

Clearly define and dimension the outside patio areas for both food service uses.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

12. COMMENT: All easements must be drawn and labeled on the DP site and utility site sheets. Easements proposed for abandonment must be abandoned by separate instrument and completed prior to approval of the DP and the recording sequence number listed on the DP.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. COMMENT: Add the future information for both Tucson Boulevard and Grant Road, Sidewalks, curbs etc. Also label the recording information related to the right of way for Tucson Boulevard and Grant Road.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

14. COMMENT: Label on sheet 2 the zoning classifications adjacent to the subject site and include the zoning classifications across the streets.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

15. COMMENT: Label Tucson Boulevard as "PUBLIC".


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

16. COMMENT: The future right of way (Area "A") that is to be dedicated in the future must be clearly delineated with distance and bearings in order to verify the MS&R reduction percentage.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

17. COMMENT: The bicycle parking calculations need to indicate that a minimum of 2 short and 2 long term facilities are required for retail use and food service use. The calculation should show 4 short and 4 long term facilities required and provided. The short term facilities shall be distributed between the three tenant areas to meet the 50 foot distance to each tenant's public entrance. Revise as required.

An approximate location for the long term facilities shall be indicated on the plan. (It is acknowledged that they will be within the building per the note under the bicycle parking calculation.)


2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

18. COMMENT: Clarify if the owner is intending to dedicate right of way at this time as shown on the plan?


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

19. COMMENT: It is not very clear on the site sheet that the street building setbacks have been represented from the existing and future back of curb location along Tucson Bl and Grant Rd.


2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

20. COMMENT: Label the height of the building area within the rezoning portion of the site. Max height is 17 feet per rezoning condition 1a. (Include with the next DP submittal copies of the building elevations with dimensions from design grade.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

21. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the site plan sheets that the pedestrian access from the site to Tucson Bl will not be obstructed by the outside ding area.


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

22. COMMENT: Indicate the type mail boxes proposed for this development. If providing gang mailboxes drawn and label the facility and location.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/10/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. The Drainage/Grading plan on sheet 3 of 11 call for a minimum FFE of 2425.6'. The rim elevation of the next upstream manhole is 2425.67' so if the FFE is only 2425.6', a backwater valve (labeled as a "BMV" on sheet 4 of 11) would be required.
2. Clarify the design of the 2" water service along the west side of the building. At one point it appears to be labeled as "31 LF EX. 2" PRIVATE SEWER".
3. The building area labeled as "3,630 SF FOOD SERVICE" shows a connection to the gravity grease interceptor but no connection to the building sanitary sewer. Show the connection of the restroom fixtures to the building sanitary sewer. Reference: Section 701.2, IPC 2012.
4. The building area labeled as "4,620 SF RETAIL" shows no connection to the building sanitary sewer. Show the connection of the restroom fixtures to the building sanitary sewer. Reference: Section 1003.3, IPC 2012 as amended by the City of Tucson.
09/10/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change September 10, 2018
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0195
PROJECT NAME: Development at Grant Road
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2502 E Grant road
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development Package

1. Refer to all new work within the right of way with PAG standard details.

2. A excavation permit will be required at time of construction.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
09/11/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Unified Development Code (UDC)
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Provide any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
09/11/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/11/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/11/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/11/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
09/12/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Clarify the location of the future right of way according to the adopted specific plan for Grant Road, R-2014-004.
2. Water harvesting landscape areas along the south and east property boundaries are to be depressed 6 to 9 inches according to keynote 5 on the grading sheet. Show how water will be directed toward these areas. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2)
09/20/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***View attachment in documents table in PRO.***

Please note that the property owner has requested the address of the proposed building be 2500 E Grant Rd and that is acceptable to Pima County Addressing.

The attached plan has been revised.

DP18-0195, 2502 E. Grant Retail/Food Service / 1st Submittal is Conditionally Approved by Pima County Addressing subject to a Lot Consolidation being completed with the Pima County Assessor and acknowledgement that the proposed building will be addressed as 2500 E Grant Rd, the existing T-Mobile Cell Site is addressed 2514 E Grant Rd and that all remaining addresses will be retired.

Please let me know if you have any questions or if I may assist you further.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
09/26/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved Sorry, you caught me on vacation and now I cannot seem to get onto the PRO site. Looking at the address on MapGuide though, I am sure there are no Parks & Recreation - related issues with that property.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
09/28/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0195Project Description: E SITE/GRAD/SWPPP - DEVELOPMENT AT GRANT ROAD
To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan.
This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff
Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf
The balance is $1,816.57. We will not review your second submittal until the plan review fees are paid.
Alexandra Hines, AICP
Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson
201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
09/28/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed