Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0186
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/09/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | No Parking - Fire Lane signs required on road and at end of right side of the hammerhead tee. Refer to appendix D of the 2018 International Fire (and amendments). I think there is a proposed fire hydrant between lots 7 and 8, but I can't be sure. Please confirm. |
| 08/16/2018 | NROSS1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | May 7, 2014 Apex Development Consultants, P.C. 2141 N Alvernon Way, Suite C Tucson, AZ 85712 Attn: Derek M. Roberts, P.E SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: Riverfront Estates, APN: Multiple Parcels, Case #: WA1570, T-14, R-14, SEC-02, Lots: 1-5,7-12, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 2.06ac Zoning: R-2 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Scott Schladweiler, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department SS:ka CC:File |
| 08/22/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/23/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 08/23/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Warrior Village Lots 1-8 and Common Areas A, B, C, D Development Package (1st Review) Tentative Plat DP18-0186 - 1185 N. Riverfront Estates TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 22, 2018 DUE DATE: August 31, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 1, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 2. COMMENT: Revise for legibility, the location map on sheet one. Only the centerlines of the roads should be drawn for legibility. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Label under the north arrow of sheet 2, the contour interval used. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 4. COMMENT: List the email addresses of the registrants and owner/developer listed on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0186, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4.B - Location map: Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 6. COMMENT: Label on the location map the collector streets, Pima Street and Rosemont Boulevard and Arcadia Avenue and Bellevue Street. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 7. COMMENT: On sheet 4 the current recorded plat is depicted with the existing recorded easements. The previous plat drawing should be removed and the new plat drawn in its place. The existing easements can remain and annotated as shown. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 8. COMMENT: On sheet 2, label the curb to property line dimension, the width of the sidewalk and label the recording data for Bellevue Street. Demonstrate that all the visitor parking spaces are within 250 feet of the farthest front yard of the farthest lot. The distance must be calculated using the pedestrian sidewalk 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 9. COMMENT: Key note 7 on sheet 3 needs to be revised to state that the street perimeter setback for the dwelling is based on the greatest of 5 feet measured from back of curb or ½ H measured from back of curb, or 1 foot measured from the property line or back of sidewalk. The Street perimeter for the carport or garage is based UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2.B.1 and .2. Revise the notes and details drawings to reflect these setbacks. Lots 3, 5 and 7 are corner lots that have two street building setbacks. Revise or add to the corner detail drawings the required building setback for the side street which will be the same as the setback for dwelling along the front. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/29/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. SECTION 4-02.0.0: FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ERZ STANDARDS 2.5 Development Restrictions Encroachment in Regulated Areas If the project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following. An Environmental Resource Report per 4-02.2.5.B for Encroachment in Regulated Areas is to be submitted with the next submittal. An application may request that an element listed below be waived or that the report address only a specified area where a full report is not applicable to the proposed encroachment. DSD may grant such waivers where the elements or full report are not required by code. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/29/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 08/29/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 08/29/2018 | NROSS1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | DP18-0186 Warrior Village / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing. The attached pdf shows Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions or if I may assist you further. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 08/29/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the Development Plan submitted on August 3, 2018, and is unable to approve the plat at this time. Please show existing TEP overhead facilities on the west side of the project. There is a potential conflict with TEP Pole Unit #217 and the entrance of Valor Dr. Additionally, there are potential conflicts with accessing existing TEP facilities on the East, West and South sides of the project. See TEP comments on the attached plan set. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent III Tucson Electric Power Co. Land Resources – RC 131 3950 E. Irvington Road Tucson, AZ 85714-2114 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 08/29/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 08/30/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Saddle-type fittings are prohibited for private sewers built per the 2012 IPC; use directional fittings instead. Reference: Section 707.1 (6), IPC 2012. 2. Private sewers 8-inches and larger require manholes, not cleanouts. Reference: Section 708.3.2, IPC 2012. 3. Revise the site drawing to indicate that backwater valves will be required for lots 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 because the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12-inches below the proposed first floor elevations. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 08/30/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0186 1) Sheet 2. At the southern end of the western basin Keynote 19 is misplaced. 2) Provide one 15' wide Public Water easement for each lot 3) Provide a reference for the spot grades. Are the spot grades 99.00 +? Example spot grade 0.11 would be 99.11. A reference cannot be found 4) Double check flow lines within lot boundaries shown on sheet 2 against flow arrows shown in Detail H on sheet 3. Example lot 3 along the eastern wall on sheet 2 shows flow arrows directed towards one another. On sheet 3, one flow arrow is shown to the north. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 08/31/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0186Project Description: E PLAT - WARRRIOR VILLAGE This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines, AICP Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/31/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |