Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0170
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/15/2019 | SBEASLE1 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/19/2019 | SBEASLE1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | Pima County Addressing will not need to review this project. I will invoice the applicant for unit numbering of the project. I will be issuing Unit 1 for the SFR and Unit 2 for the greenhouse. Nicholas Jordan, Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 02/27/2019 | MASHFOR1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/08/2019 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show drainage patterns for the parcel. Show existing and proposed directions of flow. 2. Provide cut and fill quantities. Describe the disposition of the excavated material. 3. Clarify the change in property lines shown on the plans. Completion of the lot reconfiguration must be completed before the Development Package can be approved. |
| 03/14/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | From: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section Project: DP18-0170 - New Greenhouse and Pond - Exist. Residential Use Personal Garden 2232 N. Forgeus Avenue - R-2 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2019 DUE DATE: March 18, 2019 ***Please resubmit corrected drawings and any redlined copies along with a detailed response memo, which details how the Zoning Review Comments have been addressed. CHECKLIST FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT CHANGES TO EXISTING COMMERCIAL / INDUSTRIAL SITES Purpose This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for minor changes to existing commercial sites to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The minor revisions to existing commercial sites are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. Applicability This standard shall be used for minor changes to existing commercial sites such as but not limited to; expansions less than 25%, in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, modification to accessible vehicle parking, parking area restripe, etc. Applicability is to be determined by Zoning and/or Engineering review staff. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: For electronic submittal provide a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for the electronic approval stamp. Provide a blank area next to the title block in the lower right corner of all plan sheets for an approval stamp. Once the plan is approved PDSD staff will attach a digital stamp with approval and signature. 2. COMMENT: A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. This map shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information; Relocate the location map on the cover sheet to the upper right corner. 3. COMMENT: An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. Label the sheet index with the numerical sheet numbers, i.e., 1 - G1, 2-A1 etc. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. COMMENT: The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. List the information for the Owner/developer of the site and any registrants or professionals that assisted in the preparation of the development package documents. 2. COMMENT: The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: The proposed name of the project, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. A brief legal description is to be provided. The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This project has been assigned the DP case number DP18-0170. List the case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 1. COMMENT: List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. The "current" parcel size shall be listed in square feet and acreage. The overall Lot area will change due to the requirements for a minimum of 7,000 SF for a lot in an R-1 Zone. Revise the information as required. The proposal to split the adjacent lot must be processed through land split application at PDSD and recorded through the Pima County Recorder's Office once the Land Split Application has been reviewed and approved by PDSD Staff. Just to be clear, the lot that is to be split is not zoned R-2. The lot is zoned R-1 and is only 11,585 SF in size. The minimum lot size requirements for an R-1 Lot is 7,000 SF. The proposal to split the lots as noted cannot be supported. In order to split the R-1 lot there must be a minimum of 7,000 sf for the remaining portion and the smaller portion must be combined with the current R-2 lot. Contact Steve Shields for more information on the Lot Reconfiguration process. 2. COMMENT: Floor area for each building: Unless the sleeping quarters building is attached to the principal dwelling, it is considered a detached accessory structure and cannot be counted in the GFA of the dwelling. Demonstrate on the drawings how the sleeping quarters structure is attached to the principal dwelling. As of this review, zoning will assume that the sleeping quarters structure is not attached until it is demonstrated otherwise. The maximum detached accessory structure square footage allowed is 50% of the principal structure for all detached structures that are 200 sf each and larger. The square footage of the proposed greenhouse and the existing sleeping quarters building exceeds the 1,086 SF allowed for detached structures that are over 200 SF each. A Board of Adjustment Variance may be required. The lot coverage calculations will have to be revised. Existing Site Conditions: 1. COMMENT: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Draw and label the information for Forgeus Avenue as noted above. Information on Proposed Development: The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 1. COMMENT: All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Label the zoning classification adjacent to the subject site. Design Criteria, of the UDC. 1. COMMENT: All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. On sheet 2, there is a cross section drawing for a proposed structure over the pond area that has not been drawn on the site plan. Draw and dimension the footprint of the structure and label the building setback from the property line. The minimum setback for this structure based on the height, must be 6 feet. General Comments: 1. COMMENT: Clarify if the use of the green house and the urban garden area is strictly for the owner's use. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: as noted above |
| 03/20/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/21/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Please provide a new Development Package Application and Plan with a registered engineer. Activity Number: DP18-0170 Project Description: SITE/GRADING - Ginsburg Green House and Urban Farm, subterranean. To view review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If new comments aren't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) After the necessary corrections have been made, name your documents accordingly - a 3rd submittal document would be titled: 3_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (lists changes to the Plan and which review comments are being addressed) 2) Corrected plan set with all documents (the full set) 3) Items requested by review staff After resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Prior to the completion of the next review, we require payment of the total fees (or the Review fees at a minimum). Please pay either at the permit counter or mail a check payable to the City of Tucson (address is below). Include the Activity Number on your check stub. The fee balance is $165.00 (Tucson Fire Dept. review). Thank you. City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Sharon Beasley 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/21/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |