Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0166
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 07/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 07/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 07/17/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/01/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/01/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Davis Selected Advisors - Professional and Administrative Office Use Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0166 - I-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 1, 2018 DUE DATE: August 8, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 10, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 1. COMMENT: Remove the Development Package PDSD approval stamp on sheets 7-11. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 2. COMMENT: On the Cover sheet only, provide the area as noted above for Pima County Addressing. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Label the contour used on the appropriate site sheet, (grading plan). 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 4. COMMENT: Label sheet names in the title block of sheets 6 through 11 as noted in the sheet index. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 5. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the Owner's telephone number, email address and contact person. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0166, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7. COMMENT: List the applicable use specific standard 4.9.13.Q in general note 3. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 8. COMMENT: Add a general note on the cover sheet that states that this development has been designed to comply with the development criteria of the Major Streets and Routes UDC section 5.4. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 9. COMMENT: The 50-foot buffer was not recorded on the re-subdivision plat, the buffer can be removed unless it was re-recorded by separate instrument. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 10. COMMENT: Label the distance from the face of curb to property line along both streets that front the subject site. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 11. COMMENT: Label the zoning classification for the property across Palo Verde Road. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 12. COMMENT: Per table 1106.1 Accessible Parking spaces, 6 Accessible parking spaces are required when providing between 151 and 200 parking spaces. Revise the accessible parking calculation to state the number of accessible spaces as 6 and include the number of van accessible spaces provided (min. 1 van space is required). Revise the site sheets to show the six accessible spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 13. COMMENT: Demonstrate how the long term facilities will meet the requirements in UDC section 7.4.9.D. Add dimensioned details of the proposed facilities to be used, and locations depicted within the building footprint. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 14. COMMENT: Draw and label the building setbacks on sheet two based on the back of curb location. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 15. COMMENT: The height of the bottom of the van must be dimensioned as seven feet when used under the reserved parking sign. Revise the accessible parking sign detail drawing. If Applicable indicate the location of any freestanding monument signage proposed for this development or add a general note on sheet one that all signage will be permitted under separate permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/02/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/03/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0166 1) Sheet 1. Accessible parking sign. Revise ground clearance to 7' from grade to lowest sign 2) Per City of Tucson Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual section 3.4.2 provide a grade control marker the proposed basin. On the plans please also provide the coordinates of the grade control markers so that it can be easily located in the future. 3) Sheet 5, Detail 6; update standard reference to City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 8-01.9.0 Figure 3B 4) Per TSM section 10-01.4.1 how on plans a minimum 6' wide sidewalk to complete the missing portion of sidewalk along S Palo Verde Road. Reference Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard detail 200 found in the following link http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 5) Update curb access ramp at the corner of S Palo Verde Rd and E Hemisphere Lp and the curb access ramp at the eastern end of the property along E Hemisphere Loop so that they meet the requirements of PAG standard detail 207. Reference link in comment 4 John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 08/06/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | August 6, 2018 Kelly Lee Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0166 Davis Advisors Office / 1st Submittal, Received July 12, 2018 Dear Ms. Lee, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0166, Davis Advisors Office; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 0.69 acre site located southeast of the intersection of South Palo Verde Road and East Hemisphere Loop. The land use is industrial, with the proposed development being a professional office. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Condition of approval: 1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 08/06/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The 50-foot buffer was not recorded on the re-subdivision plat, the buffer can be removed unless it was re-recorded differently. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. SECTION 5-01.0.0: LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Section Vehicle Overhangs A. Parking spaces may be designed so that the front of a vehicle overhangs into planter areas that are within a vehicular use area but cannot overhang into the street landscape border. B. When planted within the vehicular use area, trees must be located at the edge and between vehicle spaces, such as the common corner of four perpendicular spaces that face each other (see Figure 5-B, Vehicle Use Area). The minimum required vehicle overhang is three feet with the following exception. When the tree is located at the common corner of four perpendicular parking spaces that face each other, the minimum required overhang is two and one-half feet (2'-6"). The vehicle overhang is measured from the front of the wheel stop to the centerline of the tree. C. Only trees with single trunks may be planted within these planters because trees with multiple trunks need wider areas of growth and may interfere with the parked vehicles. Graphically indicate how the southern vehicle use area meets the above requirements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/06/2018 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Separate submittal and review required by Pima County Wastewater. Email sewer@pima.gov |
| 08/06/2018 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Good afternoon, Pima County Addressing will not need to review the DP for the proposed project at 6255 S Palo Verde RD. The parcel will need an address change if the planned primary access will be on E Hemisphere LP and not S Palo Verde RD. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Nicholas Jordan Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 08/06/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | Per PDSD engineering comments TDOT concurs with the following: 4) Per TSM section 10-01.4.1 how on plans a minimum 6' wide sidewalk to complete the missing portion of sidewalk along S Palo Verde Road. Reference Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard detail 200 found in the following link http://apps.pagnet.org/standardspecifications/ 5) Update curb access ramp at the corner of S Palo Verde Rd and E Hemisphere Lp and the curb access ramp at the eastern end of the property along E Hemisphere Loop so that they meet the requirements of PAG standard detail 207. Reference link in comment 4 |
| 08/10/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 August 9, 2018 WR# 6239350 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov Dear Kelly SUBJECT: Davis Advisors Office 6255 S Palo Verde Dr DP16-0166 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. There appears to be no conflicts with TEP facilities within the development. Shall any equipment need to be relocated for this project, the costs will be billable to the customer. TEP will need final, approved plans prior to determining the design for Davis Advisors. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas @ 918-8295. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant, Design |
| 08/10/2018 | NROSS1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Jean, This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/26/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |