Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0160
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/06/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/06/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 11/06/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Additional review fees for paving plans. |
| 11/06/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 11/06/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: East Place, 8175 E Golf Links Rd. Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0160 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 31, 2018 DUE DATE: October 31, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 21, 2019. 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the case number for the revised annexation conditions (C9-85-95) adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Amend general note 19. A statement that the annexations conditions are being met must be included. 3. 2-06.4.8.C - Previous comment 12 not fully addressed. Only providing right-of-way width for Golf Links and Saddleback Ave is not sufficient. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 4. 2-06.4.9.B - Previous comment 13 not addressed. Include the approximate square footage of each lot on the tentative plat. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Previous comment 19 not fully addressed. Show full dimensions for all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided. Accessible parking spaces must be provided. Indicate locations and dimensions. Only 1 accessible parking space has been provided. A total of 2 are required when 26-50 standard parking spaces are provided. At least one of the accessible parking spaces must be van accessible. Include a detail for accessible parking spaces and access aisle to verify minimum width is provided. 6. 2-06.4.9.O - Previous comment 22 not fully addressed. Include all applicable building setback lines on the site plan. Include the heights for all proposed buildings. The rear perimeter yard setback will be determined using the height of the structure. Perimeter yard setbacks on Golf Links Road will be 21' or the height of the structure, as measured from the back of future curb. Indicate setback from the back of future curb and distance to nearest structure. Perimeter yard setbacks on Saddleback Rd will be 21' or the height of the structure, as measured from the outside edge of nearest travel lane. The perimeter yard setbacks to the north and east will be 10' or ¾ the height, as measured from the property line. Indicate distance from project property line to the nearest structure. Demonstrate compliance with all required setbacks. 7. 2-06.5.2.A - Update site coverage calculations on sheet 1. Driveways for lots 1, 2 and 28 appear larger than the typical 18'x20' dimension provided. Clarify if parking areas have been included in the private street coverage of 13,905 sf. A rough estimate seems to indicate parking areas have not been included. 8. 2-06.5.3.F - Previous comment 33 not fully addressed. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.2.a. Add a general note that this project is subject to a Privacy Mitigation Plan and buffering. 9. 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Previous comment 38 not fully addressed. Provide a copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. Draft CC&Rs are not sufficient and must include all relevant information. 10. General comment - Previous comment 40 not fully addressed. Remove extra details from the tentative plat in order to clearly review the necessary components. Tentative plat does not need landscaping and other details. Lot lines and approximate building locations should be prominent. Fading of necessary information makes plan difficult to read and will cause issues with administration and approval or building plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/06/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/14/2018 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP18-0160 East Place FLD 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Please note that E Cricket Song Tr & S Daveroni Ln are acceptable street names and have been reserved for this project. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 4th Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 11/14/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 11/19/2018 | NROSS1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Date: November 17, 2018 From: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-call Design Professional To: Alexandra Hines, Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) Re: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review DP18-0160 8175 E Golf Links Road After review, based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M.1 - 4, of the required documents submitted to PDSD, I recommend approval of this project by condition, as noted below: 1. No balconies will be placed at lot locations 1-12, and opaque window film or clerestory windows with sills above five feet will be applied on all second story levels. This would apply to lots facing lots 1-12 adjacent to single story R-2 or more restrictive zoning. |
| 11/20/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections (RFC) Notice: DP18-0160 Project Description: E PLAT/FLD/GRADE/SWPPP - EAST PLACE To see review comments about the plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search and enter activity number above. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle: 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please type the activity number in Project Description or Message of PDSD Filedrop for resubmittal. Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: third (3rd) submittal, 3_plan_set.pdf 3_response_letter.pdf The balance is $759.10 due to additional grading and fire plan review and permit fee. ***Attached is your resubmittal to the city. Only zoning review comments are addressed. Would you like to address design professional review comments and then re-upload 3rd submittal?*** Alexandra Hines |
| 11/20/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |