Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0160
Parcel: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0160
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/07/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/07/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency notified for information only.
07/07/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency notified for information only.
07/07/2018 AHINES2 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Completed Water availability letter in submittal.
07/07/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency notified for information only.
07/10/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change "No Parking - Fire Lane" signs will be required. Refer to 2018 Tucson Fire Code Amendments, Appendix D for guidance, and reflect on plans.
07/11/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The proposed FFE values for lots 16 and 17 are more than 12" above the rim elevation of manhole #7 and may not have a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
07/17/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape.
Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements

8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)

1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.

2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:
a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,
b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.

Provide the required trees for pedestrian circulation or provide alternative calculation

2. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual.

4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section.

Show by detail how water harvesting is achieved.

5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.

Show if necessary hoe mechanical equipment is screened.

6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

Identify any screening elements and materials used

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
07/17/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Reqs Change Date: July 16, 2018

From: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-call Design Professional

To: Alexandra Hines, Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD)

Re: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review DP18-0160 8175 E Golf Links Road

After review, based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3.M.1 - 4, of the required documents submitted to PDSD, I recommend re-submission of this project, as noted below:

1. Privacy mitigation is required when multistory residences are proposed adjacent to existing single story residences and the existing residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. A Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) is required demonstrating compliance for Lots 1-12.
07/18/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change July 18, 2018
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0160
PROJECT NAME: East Place
PROJECT ADDRESS: 8175 E. Golf Links
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package.

1. Access is required from Golf Links only, according to annexation requirements. TDOT will support a modification to allow access from Saddleback Road. Once documentation showing a change to the annexation is submitted, the development plan can be approved.

2. Provide a traffic statement which addresses the level of service at the intersection of Golf Links and Saddleback Road and if any mitigation measures are required.

3. At time of construction a right of way permit from TDOTwill be required for work within the right of way.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
07/19/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Passed
07/20/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the Development Plan/Tentative Plat submitted on July 7, 2018, and conditionally approves the plan. Please revise the title block to reflect that this plat is a resubdivision of Blocks 7 and 8 of Lakecrest No. 1, recorded in Book 17 at Page 4, Maps and Plats.

Please send a copy of the corrected plat to mburke@tep.com

If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744.

Thank you,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent III
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources – RC 131
3950 E. Irvington Road
Tucson, AZ 85714-2114
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
07/20/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change **See attachment in documents table on PRO.***

Pima County Addressing is returning DP18-0160 East Place FLD / 1st Submittal for correction. Please see the attached plan for comments.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Nicholas Jordan
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-9623
07/20/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Passed No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
07/23/2018 EHAMBLI1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments.
07/23/2018 EHAMBLI1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP
Lead Planner

PROJECT: East Place, 8175 E Golf Links Rd.
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0160

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 23, 2018

DUE DATE: July 23, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 21, 2019.

1. 2-06.3.5 - As this is an electronic review, pleaser remove the development package PDSD approval stamp from the lower right and provide the required 3"x5" space on each sheet.

2. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

3. 2-06.4.2.B - The title block shall include a brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision. As a resubdivision, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat.

4. 2-06.4.2.C - The title block shall include a reference of being a Flexible Lot Development.

5. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0160, as well as the applicable rezoning case number, Co9-83-101, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

6. 2-06.4.2.A - On the location map on sheet 1, show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area.

7. 2-06.4.2.B - On the location map on sheet 1, identify all streets that abut the subject property.

8. 2-06.4.7 - List as a general note "The subdivision (residential development) is designed to comply with the Inclusive Home Design Ordinance, City of Tucson Ordinance 104631."

9. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - List as a general note that this site is subject to the Major Streets and Route Overlay and the Davis Monthan Air Force Base Vicinity.

10. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List as a general note "Subject to the conditions of the 22nd Street/Pantano Parkway Annexation and Rezoning (Co9-83-101 and Ordinance 6503)." The conditions of the rezoning and a statement that the conditions are being met must also be included.

11. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

12. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

13. 2-06.4.9.B - Include the approximate square footage of each lot on the tentative plat.

14. 2-06.4.9.F - Existing zoning boundaries on and adjacent to the project shall be clearly defined.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - The proposed typical street cross-section indicates a 4.5' sidewalk. The typical lot setbacks show a 4' sidewalk. Correct drawings to match. Engineering will review the proposed cross-section. Additional comments may be forthcoming.

17. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - The modified street cross-section for East Place, which includes parking areas, is required for review. A Technical Standards Modification Request must be submitted in accordance with TSM Section 10-01.7.0.

18. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Area Design Criteria of the UDC. Provide dimensions for the parking area on the east side of the site on the tentative plat.

19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show full dimensions for all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided. Accessible parking spaces must be provided. Indicate locations and dimensions.

20. 2-06.4.9.J - Draw the Major Street and Routes right-of-way lines for Golf Links Rd. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.).

21. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

22. 2-06.4.9.O - Include all applicable building setback lines. Include the heights for all proposed buildings. The rear perimeter yard setback will be determined using the height of the structure. The proposed height of the homes is 24', as indicated in the submitted Architectural Variation Plan. Perimeter yard setbacks on Golf Links Road will be 21' or the height of the structure, as measured from the back of future curb. Perimeter yard setbacks on Saddleback Rd will be 21' or the height of the structure, as measured from the outside edge of nearest travel lane. The perimeter yard setbacks to the north and east will be 10' or ¾ the height, as measured from the property line. Demonstrate compliance will all required setbacks.

23. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

24. 2-06.4.9.R - Demonstrate compliance with the City of Tucson Inclusive Home Design Ordinance. Include accessible ramps as needed.

25. 2-06.4.9.R - Per Section 7-01.3.3, within a development a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required and must connect all areas within the development. Provide a complete pedestrian path from all common areas, including the eastern parking area to the interior sidewalks. Sidewalks must also continue around the entire perimeter of East Place and cannot terminate at the common parking areas. Sidewalks must connect to Common Area B from both directions. If sidewalks are not provided continuously, accessible pedestrian circulation must be provided with accessible curb ramps.

26. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation with dimensions along abutting rights-of-way.

27. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

28. 2-06.5.2.A - Clarify developable area calculations. The plans indicate each home is 1960 sf. Is this total size including the 2nd story, or just the ground floor (building footprint)? FLD subdivisions are subject to a maximum site coverage, as calculated per Article 6.4.3. of the UDC.

29. 2-06.5.3.A - For an FLD, street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Indicate reduced perimeter yards on typical lot detail.

30. 2-06.5.3.C - Information on the FLD required functional open space has been provided on sheet 1. Calculations are provided with a note to see sheet 12. There is no sheet 12 in either the civil plan file or the landscape file. Additional information of amenities provided in the functional open space is needed.

31. 2-06.5.3.D - Provide dimensioned building elevations for all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits.

32. 2-06.5.3.E - An architectural variation plan (as submitted) is not required for this development as an AVP only applies to detached single-family homes. See comments below regarding privacy mitigation.

33. 2-06.5.3.F - Where a single-family attached or multi-family FLD project is adjacent to existing single-family residential development, the FLD shall provide buffering in order to preserve the privacy of the existing residential development. Examples of buffering include, but are not limited to, landscaping, a fence, or a wall. The proposed buffering shall be included as conditions on the approved subdivision plat per UDC Article 8.7.3.M.2.a.

34. 2-06.5.3.F - A privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC as follows:

35. 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation.

36. 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions.

37. 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include where practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots.

38. 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide a copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

39. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide a copy of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property.

40. General comment - Remove extra details from the tentative plat in order to clearly review the necessary components. Utilities and grading details should be provided elsewhere.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/26/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0160
1. Drainage notes 2 and 3 are not consistent with the drainage statement. Provide consistency in the submittal.
2. Provide the correct administrative address for the project.
3. Address the location and status of the utility easement shown on the plat for Lakecrest No. 1.
4. Since this subdivision is a re-subdivision of a part of a previous subdivision, the title block must indicate the previous subdivision and recordation. (AM 2-06.4.2.B)
5. Provide the correct sight visibility triangles, for example see the detail 5 on sheet 3. Use the sight visibility standard in the City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual.
6. Revise grading note 3 to indicate compliance with the Pima Association of Governments standard details and standard specifications.
7. Grading note 11 indicates the grading will be in conformance with a geotechnical engineering investigation. Provide the geotechnical report with the next submittal. Ensure the plan is consistent with the report.
8. Provide the correct web address for inspection scheduling in grading note 31.
9. Confirm the cut and fill quantities for this project. Provide existing and proposed grades throughout the site.
07/27/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0160Project Description: E TENT PLAT/ FLD/ GRADE/ SWPPP - EAST PLACE

To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan.
This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff
Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf
Alexandra Hines, AICP
Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson
201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
07/27/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed