Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0156
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/05/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/24/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Per conversations with Chris Palmateer, principal for VLMK Engineering and Design, two additional doors will be added to the north side of the building, but are not yet reflected on the drawings. |
| 09/25/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the case number for the TSMR on all sheets. Include a note on the cover sheet indicating the TSMR is approved and include any conditions of approval. |
| 09/25/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tucson Airport DC - Multi-Tenant Building "B" Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0156 - I-1 Zoning (Proposed uses include Office, Manufacturing and Storage) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 25, 2018 DUE DATE: September 28, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 22, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section ***Please address the 5 follow up comments noted below. The standards and previous comments have been left as reference. Only address the follow up comments and any applicable new comments related to changes to the DP due to staff review. Remove the reference statement made in the lower right corner of the sheets "REVISED DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE INTAKE SET: 08-30-18". (This is not a revised DP as it has not been approved.) 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: The registrant Jason C. Sahlin's information could not be verified on the cover sheet. All registrants that assisted in the preparation or who's seal is stamped on these plans must be added to the cover sheet as noted by the previous comment. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: List the email addresses for all registrants and owner/developer. I don't think it is appropriate to include City staff information on the Plans. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 10: Sheets 17 - 19 do not have the legal description included in next to the title block. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: Include in the title block of all plans sheets the lot number as recorded in map and plat 64/65. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 12: Sheets 4, 8-11, 14-16 are missing the DP and annexation case numbers. Sheets 16 is missing the administrative address, sheets 17-19 are missing the DP and annexation case numbers and legal descriptions as noted in the civil sheets. Add missing information from the sheets. Assure that all sheets are consistent as noted in the previous comment. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. PREVIOUS COMMENT 12: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0156, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. List as reference the Annexation case number C15-88-01 next to the title block of all plan sheets. List the administrative street address on sheet 16 next to the title block. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 1. COMMENT 16: All zoning notes, zoning calculations etc. shall be listed preferably on the first or same page. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 18: WE acknowledge that at this time there is no specific tenant or specific manufacturing use proposed. However, after consulting with the Steve Shields Section Review Manager, that in order to cover all the bases and or better yet all manufacturing uses that may be a viable tenant type we are requesting that all manufacturing uses and their associated use specific standards be listed. Please keep in mind that not all manufacturing uses are created equal when it comes to the use specific standards, so it is important to verify which uses are potential tenant types and which uses may require more thought before listing them. Review the use specific standards for each use for any conflicts. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18: List as a general note the proposed uses of the site and include any applicable Use Specific Standards. It must be very clear on the DP what the uses are going to be in order to verify the correct use specific standards that are applicable to the specific use. For instance, is the office use a separate Administrative and Professional Office, is it a Medical Service Outpatient Office etc. Is the Manufacturing Use a General Manufacturing Use, Hazardous Material Use, Perishable Goods Manufacturing etc.? Is the Warehouse for Commercial, Personal Storage, Hazardous Material Storage etc.? Clearly define the uses and include the use specific standards that apply to that use. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 23 and 20: All new easements must be recorded prior to issuance of the C of O. Recorded easement documents must be presented to the zoning review staff for verification and archiving. The relevant DP sheets may have to be revised to include the recording information. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 23: See related comment 20. 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 30: Per IBC 2012 Version, section 1106.5 - For every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van accessible space. Based on 7 accessible parking spaces required 2 van accessible spaces are required revise the drawing to show 2 van accessible spaces and the calculations to indicate that two van spaces have been provided. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. PREVIOUS COMMENT 30: The width of the sidewalk along the east side of the building could not be verified. If the vehicle parking spaces that abut a pedestrian sidewalk are not designed with wheel stops 2.5 feet from the front of the parking space, the minimum width of the sidewalk must be 6.5 feet wide. Add wheel stops at these parking space locations or label the width of the sidewalk and assure that the width is 6.5 feet which would allow for a 2.5 foot overhang for a parked vehicle. As noted in comment 19 above, the vehicle, bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified until it is clearly defined how much square footage is proposed for each use. In detail 5 on sheet 13, label the 7'-0" dimension to the bottom of the Van Accessible Sign when used. The 7'-0" dimension can be used for the Standard Accessible Space sign. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/26/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unified Development Code 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Screening Note: The minimum screen height is 30" to screen vehicle use area from streets. 5' screen is indicated. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 09/28/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 09/28/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | September 28, 2018 Alexandra Hines Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0156 Tucson Airport DC/ 2nd Submittal, Received September 27, 2018 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0156, Tucson Airport DC; 2nd Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 8.33 acre site located northwest of the intersection of East Elvira Road and Brosius Avenue. The land use is industrial, with the proposed development being a speculative building to be used by future tenants of the building. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the 2nd submittal of this project and has no additional comments to submit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 10/01/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Per conversations with Chris Palmateer, two additional doors will be added on the north side, and will be reflected in the next set of drawings. |
| 10/02/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide TSMR case number and a note indicating the approval and any conditions. |
| 10/02/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/05/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |