Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0156
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/05/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please indicate location of all new and/or existing fire hydrants. Refer to section 507 of the 2018 International Fire Code for spacing guidance. Also, if the proposed use of the building is high piled storage, review section 3206.7.5 for number and spacing of access doors. |
| 07/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | agency notified for information only. |
| 07/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | Agency notified for information only. |
| 07/19/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unified Development Code 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS The landscape plan shall include the following: Calculations a. Square footage of the site; b. Square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation; c. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees; e. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas; f. Length and width of landscape borders and landscape transition borders and number of canopy trees per length; and, g. Square footage of all landscaped borders and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage, when applicable. Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; C. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening elements on landscape plan. Irrigation Plan 1. Type of water conserving irrigation systems proposed and differentiation between systems for the different water use zones on the site; 2. Source of irrigation water; 3. Indicate potable or reclaimed water use. Reclaimed water system specifications, if used; 4. System specifications and system design and layout (Section 4-01.4.2, Irrigation Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual); Plant Cover/Dust Control All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved must be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with a layer of inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Indicate treatment on landscape plan. 7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION 7.7.3. APPLICABILITY The provisions of this section apply to all development as listed below. A. New Development B. Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or, Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan. Submit NPP plan or Application for Exception. SECTION 4-01.0.0: COMMERCIAL RAINWATER HARVESTING Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010. A separate Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall consist of two elements: a Site Water Budget and a Water Harvesting Implementation Plan. Preparation of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan elements requires coordination between project managers, site engineers and landscape architects from the inception of the project. The two elements of the Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall illustrate how water harvesting will meet 50% of annual landscape water demand, as required by the ordinance. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/19/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for multi-use commercial buildings. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 07/25/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | see zoning comments |
| 07/25/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tucson Airport DC - Multi-Tenant Building "B" Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0156 - I-1 Zoning (Proposed uses include Office, Manufacturing and Storage) TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 24, 2018 DUE DATE: July 30, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 22, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 1. COMMENT: Assure that sheet 16 has been provided with the space for the digital stamp. The area shall be located in the lower right quadrant of the sheet, to match all other DP sheets. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 2. COMMENT: The 3 by 5 block is for addressing is only required on the cover sheet. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 3. COMMENT: The cover sheet shall have the location map in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. Revise the location as required. Also see related comments to the content requirement for the location map as noted in standards 2-06.4.4.A, .B, and .C below. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 4. COMMENT: List the contour interval used on the grading sheet. 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 5. COMMENT: All text and dimensions shall be oriented so that the text can be read left to right or bottom to top of the sheets. Revise all site sheets to have all text and dimension written as noted above. 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 6. COMMENT: Sheet 2 includes a Master Site Plan but it appears that there is only one building proposed under this DP. Clarify if that is correct and that a future DP will be submitted for the Building "C". 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 7. COMMENT: The sheet index shall include only the sheets in the Development package. Do not list any building plan sheets. 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 8. COMMENT: List the email addresses for all registrants and owner/developer. I don't think it is appropriate to include City staff information on the Plans. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 9. COMMENT: Assure that the title block information on sheet 16 is the same as all other sheets. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 10. COMMENT: Include in the title block of all plans sheets the lot number as recorded in map and plat 64/65. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 11. COMMENT: On sheet four, list the sheet number and number of sheets in the lower right corner of the title block. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 12. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0156, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. List as reference the Annexation case number C15-88-01 next to the title block of all plan sheets. List the administrative street address on sheet 16 next to the title block. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 13. COMMENT: Draw the location map in the upper right corner of the cover sheet at a scale of 3 inches equal to a mile, as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 14. COMMENT: Draw and label Ginter Road on the location map. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 15. COMMENT: Label the section corners that are within the one mile location map. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 16. COMMENT: All zoning notes, zoning calculations etc. shall be listed preferably on the first or same page. 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 17. COMMENT: List as a general note the zoning classification of the property. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 18. COMMENT: List as a general note the proposed uses of the site and include any applicable Use Specific Standards. It must be very clear on the DP what the uses are going to be in order to verify the correct use specific standards that are applicable to the specific use. For instance, is the office use a separate Administrative and Professional Office, is it a Medical Service Outpatient Office etc. Is the Manufacturing Use a General Manufacturing Use, Hazardous Material Use, Perishable Goods Manufacturing etc.? Is the Warehouse for Commercial, Personal Storage, Hazardous Material Storage etc.? Clearly define the uses and include the use specific standards that apply to that use. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 19. COMMENT: Clearly list the square footage of the floor areas for each use. In order to verify vehicle and bicycle parking or loading zone requirements, the floor areas must be clearly defined. (It is acknowledged that there are no specific tenants at this time.) 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 20. COMMENT: It appears that there is going to be a shared access drive providing not only access but maneuvering area for access to the existing and new docks. Clarify if there will be a cross access easement recorded or is there a blanket easement that has been recorded per the plat. If not a recorded cross access easement will be required prior to approval of the DP. The recording information shall be labeled on the plans and the easement must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on the plans. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 21. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. The information can be drawn on sheet 2, overall master site plan. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 22. COMMENT: The curve data for curve C7 and C8 could not be verified on any of the sheets. Include the curve data on sheet 3. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 23. COMMENT: See related comment 20. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 24. COMMENT: On sheet 3, include the information as noted by the standard above for all 3 streets that are adjacent to the subject site. Label the curb to property line and center line to curb dimensions. Label the width of the existing public sidewalks. (Some of the information has already been annotated but not all.) 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 25. COMMENT: Label zoning classification of the subject site and the zoning adjacent to the project as noted by the standard above. This includes the zoning classifications across the streets. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 26. COMMENT: Sheet 2 depicts an overall master plan but it does not appear that the overall master plan is to be phased. It is assumed that the master plan is intended for future developmental potential only and is not intended to represent a phased development. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 27. COMMENT: Draw and label existing and future sight visibility triangles. Consult with PDSD engineering for information on SVT's. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 28. COMMENT: Consult with Fire and Solid Waste Plans Reviewers about any requirements for lock boxes at the gated entry points. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 29. COMMENT: See related comment 24. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 30. COMMENT: The width of the sidewalk along the east side of the building could not be verified. If the vehicle parking spaces that abut a pedestrian sidewalk are not designed with wheel stops 2.5 feet from the front of the parking space, the minimum width of the sidewalk must be 6.5 feet wide. Add wheel stops at these parking space locations or label the width of the sidewalk and assure that the width is 6.5 feet which would allow for a 2.5 foot overhang for a parked vehicle. As noted in comment 19 above, the vehicle, bicycle parking requirements cannot be verified until it is clearly defined how much square footage is proposed for each use. In detail 5 on sheet 13, label the 7'-0" dimension to the bottom of the Van Accessible Sign when used. The 7'-0" dimension can be used for the Standard Accessible Space sign. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 31. COMMENT: Once it is clear how the building square footage is allocated for each use verify the number and type of loading zones required and provided. Add the calculation as required and draw and label the loading zones and the type A or B. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 32. COMMENT: Review UDC section 7.4.9.B for dimension standards for short and long term dimensions of the facility areas. If multiple tenants are proposed the bicycle parking both short and long term will have to be adjusted to provide sufficient long and short term bicycle parking spaces for each use. Also, the location of the long term facilities must be clearly depicted on the building footprint. (It is acknowledged that the tenants have not been signed at this time.) 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 33. COMMENT: If the intent is for a phased development that includes building "C" include the phasing information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 34. COMMENT: If applicable to this project address the standard above. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 35. COMMENT: The building setback along the Aragon Road frontage must be clearly annotated. Based on the 38-foot height as noted in the response letter, the minimum building setback along Aragon shall be 38 feet from the nearest edge of travel lane. Label the building setback from the nearest edge of travel lane to the north building wall. The building setbacks from the south and east street frontages are well within the requirements. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 36. COMMENT: Label the height of the building within the building footprints. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 37. COMMENT: A sidewalk shall be provided adjacent to the parking spaces and the south side of the building. The minimum width is four feet unless it is constructed adjacent to the parking spaces without wheel stops in which case the sidewalk must be a minimum of 6.5 feet wide. See related comment 30 above. At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainage-way or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project; provide a sidewalk to Brosius Avenue. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 38. COMMENT: Label the Annexation case number C15-88-01 in the lower right corner of all plan sheets next to the title block. Include as a general note that his development is subject to compliance with the conditions of the annexation C15-88-01. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 39. COMMENT: Indicate by response whether gang mailboxes are proposed, if so draw and label the location. If mail is to be delivered or distributed to each tenant individually state as such as a general note. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 40. COMMENT: Add a general note that states that all sign is to be permitted under separate permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/26/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | ***See attachement in documents folder on PRO.*** No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -Eric |
| 07/27/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/27/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | This DP will not require review by Pima County Addressing. I worked on this parcel previously when the project was being scoped. I retired the extra addresses on the parcel to ensure that 6850 S Brosius AV was the only address to remain. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Nicholas Jordan Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 07/27/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | July 20, 2018 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0156 PROJECT NAME: Tucson airport DC New Shell Building PROJECT ADDRESS: 8175 E. Golf Links PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised and added to the Development package. 1. Improvements within the right of way are acceptable. However the City of Tucson uses the Pima Association of Governments (PAG) standard details not COT standard details. Revise all references and details to PAG standard details. 2. Provide a traffic impact analysis which includes the level of service and capacity requirements along Country Club Road including the intersections of Elvira/Country Club, and Medina/Country Club. Include any mitigation measures required. 3. At time of construction a right of way permit or a private improvement agreement with TDOT will be required for work within the right of way. 4. Sidewalk along the perimeter of the project requires 5 feet width. Show on plan 5. Show sight visibility triangles for all driveways. 6. 25 foot curb return radius required for all driveways show on plan. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/30/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Reqs Change | July 30, 2018 Alexandra Hines Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0156 Tucson Airport DC/ 1st Submittal, Received July 27, 2018 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0156, Tucson Airport DC; 1st Submittal, a development package application for an approximately 8.33 acre site located northwest of the intersection of East Elvira Road and Brosius Avenue. The land use is industrial, with the proposed development being a speculative building to be used by future tenants of the building. This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition shall be identified in the general notes of the revised development plan. Condition of approval: 1. "According to the FAA Notice Criteria Tool, this project is located in proximity to a navigation facility and could impact navigation signal reception. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA at least 45 days before construction activities begin for the project. It is highly recommended that the applicant file earlier than 45 days to provide the applicant with sufficient time to respond to any concerns which are identified by the FAA. Any cranes used which are used must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp" 2. "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The Avigation Easement shall be recorded in a manner with the Pima County recorder which shall document it as having title liability. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Please record the Avigation Easement with the Pima County Recorder's Office. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a complete copy of the recorded easement document to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below. Scott Robidoux Senior Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc file |
| 07/31/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0156 1. Revise the SWPPP plan so the concrete washout meets the requirements of the Aquifer Protection General Permit at Arizona Administrative Code R18-9-B301.L. Concrete washout impoundments must be at least 50 feet from an open drainage facility along with other requirements. 2. Revise the solid waste enclosures to meet the requirements of Technical Standard 8-01. 3. Make a note that all signs will be by separate permit. 4. Show sight visibility triangles at all street intersections and driveways per TS 10-01.5.0. 5. Provide dimensions for existing and proposed sidewalk in the rights of way adjacent to the project. If the existing sidewalk is less than 4 feet wide, it must be replaced with 5-foot sidewalk. New sidewalks must be 5 feet wide. |
| 08/01/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0156Project Description: E SITE/GRADE/SWPPP- TUCSON AIRPORT DC To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines, AICP Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/22/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Agency notified for information only. |
| 08/22/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 August 20, 2018 WR# 6239341 DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov Dear Kelly SUBJECT: Tucson Airport DC 6850 S Brosius DP18-0156 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan. The transformer RCKE-2 appears to be in conflict with the retension/detention swale and will need to be relocated, TEP cannot extend the primary from RCKE-3. Per the attached TEP facilities map, RCKE-3 will feed bldg. B from RCKE-3 as a service only. All relocation cost is billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Steve Doniere @ 918-8275. Sincerely, Beth Shelton Elizabeth "Beth" Shelton Admin Assistant, Design |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |