Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0147
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/20/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/12/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 1330 E Drachman Street - R-2 Zoning Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0147 - Multi-family Development TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 12, 2018 DUE DATE: July 17, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 15, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the Landscape Architects information on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0147, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 3. COMMENT: List the actual number of units (14) proposed under note 5 of the Zoning and Land Use Notes text block. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 4. COMMENT: Under the Zoning and Land Use Notes, note 8, list the square footage of each unit and the square footage of each building. If the units are all the same square footage indicate the square footage as typical. If not typical list the square footages based o the different sizes. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 5. COMMENT: Include a breakdown of the lot coverage calculation under note 6 of the Zoning and Land use notes text block. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 6. COMMENT: If applicable, add and label any easements on the property. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 7. COMMENT: The sight visibility triangles could not be verified on any of the site sheets. Draw and label the SVT's as noted by the standard above. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/12/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unified Development Code 2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/12/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/17/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0147Project Description: E SITE/GRADE - APARTMENT BUILDINGS Fees Outstanding: $2,286.52. We will not review 2nd submittal until review fees are paid. Are you able to use the online permit payment? To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search.You will need to enter the activity number shown above to see comments about the plan. This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewers what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop and the plans will re-enter the 20 working day review cycle:1) Corrected plan set2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,2_plan_set.pdf2_response_letter.pdf Alexandra Hines, AICP Lead Planner at Planning and Development Services, City of Tucson 201 N Stone Ave 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 837-6975 - alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/17/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Needs Review | DP18-0147 1) Add note on plans "Available landscaped areas to be depressed 6" for rain water harvesting" 2) Engineering can conduct an over the counter "electronic" review once the above comment and other department comments have been addressed. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/17/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |