Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0127
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/31/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/06/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/15/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Pima Pet Clinic, 4832 E. Speedway Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0127 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 15, 2018 DUE DATE: June 28, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 1, 2019. 1. Demolition of the existing structure on the west side of the subject property will require an application, review and permit separate from DP18-0127. 2. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.1 - Correct the title block on sheet 7 as the owner information doesn't match the other sheets. 4. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0127, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide the percentage of building, lot area, or vehicle use area expansion. 6. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 7. 2-06.4.9.F - Correct zoning boundaries to the south of the subject property. The adjacent R-2 zone should be delineated on the centerline of the public alley. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - All vehicle use areas on the site must be brought into full site compliance. The existing parking area on the southeast corner can no longer be accessed from the alleyway. The existing parking area must also be designed to current standards. Provide specifications and dimensions for the all parking areas. 12. 2-06.4.9.J - Add the Major Street or Route (MS&R) future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles etc. along Speedway Blvd. The right-of-way measurement is incorrect. The full right-of-way width for Speedway Blvd. is 120'. 13. 2-06.4.9.O - Correct the perimeter yard (setback) widths in general note 16. The required street (north) perimeter yard setback on Speedway should be 21'as measured from the back of future curb. The required rear (south) perimeter yard width is 1.5 times the height, due to adjacency to the residential zone. 14. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the specific use proposed within the footprint of each building. 15. 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable, provide locations and types of new proposed signs. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/15/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments - revisions to parking areas needed, site accessibility to be determined after revisions are made. |
| 06/25/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculation, the vehicular use area expansion appears to be greater than 50% if so then the entire site needs to meet code including existing parking lot. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Vehicular Use Areas The standards in this Section 7.6.4.B apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces, except as provided in Section 7.6.4.B.1.c, Exemptions. 1. Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas a. General Standards Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. (1) The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). (2) Fifty percent of the trees required for landscape borders located within ten feet of the paved portion(s) of a vehicular use area may be counted towards both the minimum parking lot canopy tree standard and the landscape border canopy tree standard. (3) An unpaved planting area, which must be a minimum of 34 square feet in area and four feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. (4) In development where it is necessary to bring the existing vehicular use areas into conformance with these regulations, gaps are allowed in the tree coverage requirement of even distribution, provided that at least the minimum required number of trees is placed within or adjacent to the vehicular use area with coverage which is as uniform as possible. Canopy trees adjacent to the vehicular use area may count toward meeting this requirement, provided the trees meet the criteria listed in Section 7.6.4.B.1.a(1). Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/25/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/27/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0127 1) Sheet 3; Keynote 35. Per City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.3.C.6, compacted decomposed granite or similar material cannot be used for construction of a required sidewalk system that is part of the required accessible route or pedestrian circulation path. Replace proposed granite path with an approved material specified in TSM section 7-01.4.3.C 2) Sheet 4: Plans show a transition ramp occurring around a corner, indicating that there is an elevation change in two directions. This transition occurs to the left of the main building entrance (keynote 1 on sheet 3). Access ramps should only transition in elevation in one direction. Provide an ADA compliant handrail with kick plate where this transition occurs 3) Show on plans the slope running parallel to all proposed sidewalk ramps 4) Sheet 3; Keynote 13. For the two proposed pedestrian access gates, dimension out the minimum Accessible Area needed. Reference figure 404.2.4.1 in the following link for minimum area required. It is not clear that enough space is provided. https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and-sites/about-the-ada-standards/ada-standards/chapter-4-accessible-routes 5) Sheet 3; Keynote 10. Per City of Tucson Unified Development Code section 7.4.6.E.2, Provide notation showing that vertical clearance of sign cabinet to finished grade meets minimum clearance requirements 6) Sheet 3; Keynote 34. What is the purpose of the proposed new structural piers? 7) Sheet 4; New sidewalk scupper on south side of building. A scupper is intended to be flush with the sidewalk. The transition in slope needs to occur prior to the placement of the scupper, not after the scupper. Double check that slope and ramp meet accessible requirements. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 06/28/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Lisa: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |