Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0124
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/11/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/01/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | See previoues comments June 25, 2018 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0124 PROJECT NAME: Starbucks Coffee River Road PROJECT ADDRESS: 65 W River Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised or added to the Development package. 1. The proposed driveway apron along River road requires a new PAG standard 25 foot curb return driveway. The existing does not meet ADA requirements. 2. Replace any cracked or buckled sidewalk along River road frontage. 3. Refer to all new work within the right of way with PAG standard details not PC/COT. 4. A right of way permit from TDOT permits and codes will be required at time of construction. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/05/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles on the Site, Grading & Landscape plans ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Scenic Route The Scenic Routes buffer area, provide written approval for use of ROW from TDOT. Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 30" screen is required to screen vehicle use area and drive-thru form adjacent streets Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening element on landscape plan Note: Vegetation used to meet the screening standards is not included in the SCZ revegitation Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 11/05/2018 | ELISA HAMBLIN | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP; Lead Planner PROJECT: Starbucks Coffee, 65 W. River Rd. Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0124 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 5, 2018 DUE DATE: November 6, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 24, 2019. 1. Previous comment 2 not fully addressed. This project is part of a large shopping center site. The entire site must be shown on the cover sheet. A sheet index may be used to illustrate the smaller project area. The supplemental survey submitted with this package should be included on the cover sheet or as an additional sheet in the DP. Property information for the entire site should be illustrated. 2. 2-06.3.8 - Previous comment 6. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Correct the administrative address provided in the title block on sheet 16. Ensure title block includes consistent information across all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.4 - Previous comment 10. The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 5. 2-06.4.4.A - Previous comment 11. On the location map, show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 6. 2-06.4.4.B - Previous comment 12. On the location map, identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 7. 2-06.4.4.C - Previous comment 13. On the location map, include the section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Previous comment 14. List as a general note the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed use. Revise City of Tucson General Note 1 on the cover sheet to read "The existing use of the site is General Merchandise Sales, Shopping Center. The proposed use is Food Service, Restaurant subject to use specific standards: 4.9.4.M.1 and 4.9.13.P. The site is located within the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay and the Major Streets and Routes Overlay (UDC Articles 5.3 and 5.4)." 9. 2-06.4.8.C - Previous comment 17 not fully addressed. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Full dimensions for the full width of River Rd. must be included. 10. 2-06.4.9.F - Previous comment 18 not fully addressed. All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. Zoning information must be included on the site plan and the boundaries must be clearly defined. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Previous comment 19 not fully addressed. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Previous comment 22 not fully addressed. Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. Clarify location of long term bicycle spaces and the dimensions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/05/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments. |
| 11/07/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-124 Please provide a response letter detailing how each comment has been addressed. The following comments from the previous review have not been adequately addressed: There are many inconsistencies within these plans. Not all of them have been identified. Please review all plan sheets and ensure they are consistent. Additional comments may be made once these inconsistencies are corrected. (For example, the solid waste container enclosure on the plan view doesn't match the detail referenced in the callout. Neither appears to match the City of Tucson standard as indicated in the keynote.) Review all callouts, details and keynotes to ensure the plan is consistent throughout. 1.(Addressed.) 2. Note that all structures including light poles and all signs will require separate permits. 3. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. 4. Addressed. 5. Revise the details for the trash container enclosure to match the requirements of Technical Standard 8-01.9. 6. The basis of elevation is a long distance from the site. Use a closer benchmark. 7. The boundaries of the project need to be tied to the basis of bearing. Use a closer monument line for the basis of bearing. 8. Include a complete Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with the next submittal. Include an ADEQ checklist showing how all requirements have been met. Additional comments: 9. The basis of elevation is a monument about 12 miles from the site. Provide a local basis of bearing. (Note two separate bases of bearing and two separate bases of elevation are referenced on the plans. Choose one of each and make sure they are fully described on the plans.) 10. The Flood Statement on sheet 7 (C1) references the City of Scottsdale code. Please correct. 11. Revise the retention statement and landscape plans to show how water harvesting will be maximized. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2) 13. The plans list the City of Tucson as the wastewater utility provider. The correct provide is Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department. |
| 11/13/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Andrew: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: 3rd submittal, 3_plan_set.pdf 3_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
| 11/13/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | COMMUNITY PLANNING TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Kelly Lee Lead Planner PROJECT: Starbuck's Northmall Centre Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0124 DATE: November 13, 2018 1. List all conditions of rezoning on the sheet set and Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/17/2018 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |