Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0124
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/24/2018 | KELLY LEE | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/12/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) has no comments regarding the First (1st) Submittal of the Site/Grade Development Package for the CDRC Development Plan DP18-0124. The proposed Starbucks Coffee Shop will be located at the southwest corner of the River Road/Stone Avenue intersection. The property address is 65 W. River Road. We appreciate the opportunity to review the First (1st) Submittal of the Site/Grade Development Package for the proposed development. Maria Deal Transportation Engineering Specialist ADOT Southern Regional Traffic Engineering 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 520.388.4235 mdeal@azdot.gov |
| 06/13/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Starbucks Coffee, 65 W. River Rd. Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0124 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 11, 2018 DUE DATE: June 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 24, 2019. 1. Demolition of the existing structure on the west side of the subject property will require an application, review and permit separate from DP18-0124. 2. This project is part of a large shopping center site. The entire site must be shown on the cover sheet. A sheet index may be used to illustrate the smaller project area. 3. 2-06.3.2 - Correct the scale for all mapped sheets. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. 4. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 5. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 6. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 7. 2-06.3.11 - Locate the key plan to the first sheet. 8. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description is to be provided with the title block and project name. 9. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0124, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 10. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 11. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 12. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 13. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 14. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - List as a general note the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed use. 15. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 16. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Revise the square footage listed on the outdoor dining area. It should be 300 sf not 310 sf. 17. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 18. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Remove the ghosted parking layout from the site plan shown on sheet 2. Provide a copy of the last approved plan to determine changes. Full dimensions for all parking installed as part of this project must be included. Parking calculations can be determined from the total shopping center square footage, including restaurants. Please verify total number of spaces removed. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 23. 2-06.4.9.O - The street perimeter yard width (setback) from River Road will be 21' or the height of the structure (whichever is greater) measured to the back of future curb of the MS&R cross-section. Correct the setback once the curb location is shown. 24. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 25. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 26. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/13/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Starbucks Coffee, 65 W. River Rd. Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0124 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 19, 2018 (Revised from June 11, 2018 Transmittal) DUE DATE: June 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One-year Expiration date is May 24, 2019. 1. Demolition of the existing structure on the west side of the subject property will require an application, review and permit separate from DP18-0124. 2. This project is part of a large shopping center site. The entire site must be shown on the cover sheet. A sheet index may be used to illustrate the smaller project area. 3. 2-06.3.2 - Correct the scale for all mapped sheets. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. 4. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 5. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 6. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 7. 2-06.3.11 - Locate the key plan to the first sheet. 8. 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description is to be provided with the title block and project name. 9. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0124, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 10. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 11. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 12. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 13. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 14. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - List as a general note the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed use. 15. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 16. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Revise the square footage listed on the outdoor dining area. It should be 300 sf not 310 sf. 17. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 18. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 19. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 20. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Remove the ghosted parking layout from the site plan shown on sheet 2. Provide a copy of the last approved plan to determine changes. Full dimensions for all parking installed as part of this project must be included. Parking calculations can be determined from the total shopping center square footage, including restaurants. Please verify total number of spaces removed. 22. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 23. 2-06.4.9.O - The street perimeter yard width (setback) from River Road will be 66' measured from the property line based on the proposed height of 22' per UDC Article 5.3.5.A. Correct the proposed setback. 24. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 25. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 26. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Elisa Hamblin at (520) 837-4966 or Elisa.Hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or Steve Shields at (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/15/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments - pedestrian circulation on abutting right-of-way not shown. |
| 06/18/2018 | KELLY LEE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/19/2018 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | For information only. |
| 06/19/2018 | KELLY LEE | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Good morning, Pima County Addressing will not need to review DP 18-0124/Starbucks-65W River Road. An address was assigned to the proposed structure prior to submittal to COT. Regards Nicholas Jordan Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-9623 |
| 06/19/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | For information only |
| 06/19/2018 | KELLY LEE | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | For Information only |
| 06/19/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | For information only |
| 06/20/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Scenic Route Street landscape borders on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route are subject to the standards of Section 5.3.4,Scenic Route Buffer Area. A buffer area in accordance with Section 5.3.4, Scenic Route Buffer Area, is required on property with street frontage on a designated Scenic Route . Landscaping on Adjacent Sites Existing drought tolerant vegetation on adjacentsites must be considered in design to prevent abrupt changes in plant types and to maintain a visual continuity along street frontages. Measurement of the Scenic Routes Buffer Area 1. The Scenic Routes buffer area is measured from the future MS&R right-of-way, except as follows. 2. Exception. Where the MS&R roadway design includes installation of a sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path, the buffer may be measured from the MS&R projected back of the sidewalk, pedestrian way, or bike path if the buffer does not encroach more than ten feet into the future MS&R right-of-way with the written permission of the City of Tucson Department of Transportation. The use of the MS&R right-of-way is permitted only if the area can be landscaped. Verify that the site meets the above section. If so, provide written approval for use of ROW from TDOT. Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Screening a. Location of screening elements; b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement; c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and, d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening element on landscape plan Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/22/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | |
| 06/25/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/25/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | June 25, 2018 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0124 PROJECT NAME: Starbucks Coffee River Road PROJECT ADDRESS: 65 W River Road PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: The following items must be revised or added to the Development package. 1. The proposed driveway apron along River road requires a new PAG standard 25 foot curb return driveway. The existing does not meet ADA requirements. 2. Replace any cracked or buckled sidewalk along River road frontage. 3. Refer to all new work within the right of way with PAG standard details not PC/COT. 4. A right of way permit from TDOT permits and codes will be required at time of construction. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/27/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | There are many inconsistencies within these plans. Not all of them have been identified. Please review all plan sheets and ensure they are consistent. Additional comments may be made once these inconsistencies are corrected. 1. Show dimensions for existing sidewalk along River Road. Where the sidewalk is less than 4 feet wide provide new 6-foot sidewalks. 2. Note that all structures including light poles and all signs will require separate permits. 3. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. 4. Where City of Phoenix Standard Details or other jurisdiction details are referenced, provide the detail sheets or reference the corresponding Pima Association of Governments standard details. Make sure all standard details are correctly referenced. 5. Revise the details for the trash container enclosure to match the requirements of Technical Standard 8-01.9. 6. The basis of elevation is a long distance from the site. Use a closer benchmark. 7. The boundaries of the project need to be tied to the basis of bearing. Use a closer monument line for the basis of bearing. 8. Include a complete Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan with the next submittal. Include an ADEQ checklist showing how all requirements have been met. |
| 06/28/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Andrew: This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. Thank you, Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/18/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |