Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0120
Parcel: 12317218A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0120
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/29/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
06/01/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
06/13/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
06/13/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: 1333 E. Drachman Street - Multi-family Dwellings
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0120 - R-2 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 12, 2018
DUE DATE: June 26, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 22, 2019.

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

1. COMMENT: On the cover sheet provide the Landscape Architects information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

2. COMMENT: Clarify if there is name for this project; if so list the name in the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0120, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed.

4. COMMENT: List the total number of units proposed under general note 5.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

5. COMMENT: Under the Zoning and Land Use Notes section list the square footage of each unit and the square footage of the building footprints. The overall footprint of the east and west buildings appear to be the same with the north building having a smaller footprint.


2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

6. COMMENT: The information for the building footprint square footage is required in order to verify compliance with site/lot coverage.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

7. COMMENT: If applicable, add and label any easements on the property.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

8. COMMENT: The sight visibility triangles could not be verified on any of the site sheets. Draw and label the SVT's as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

9. COMMENT: Relocate the short term bicycle facility located behind the north dumpster to the area between the south dumpster building 2109 next to the sidewalk system.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

10. COMMENT: Add the proposed building setback dimension from all street frontages not just the minimum requirements. If the building is multi-level or stepped back levels add the setback dimensions accordingly. Add the proposed building setbacks from the north property line based on the heights facing the north property line. Again, if there are multi-level elevations facing the north property line, the setbacks shall be labeled from the property line to the elevation wall. (Zoning is requesting that on the next submittal a copy of the building elevations be included for reference and to verify building setbacks.)


2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

11. COMMENT: Draw and label the gang mail box symbol at the south location. It is not clear where the mail box is to be placed.



12. COMMENT: All changes made to the site plan sheet shall be made on all site sheets, i.e. grading, landscape, utility sheets etc.


13. COMMENT: Add a keynote on the site and/or grading sheet indicating on which plan sheet the van accessible parking detail is provided.


14. COMMENT: As a reminder, the buildings are greater than 50 Years, prior to demo of the exisitng buildings a Historic review and approval will be required.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/20/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
The following information must be provided on the plans. Information may be combined on one sheet if the combination of information does not obscure other details. (Information can be referenced on grading plan)
Grading Information
1. Percent slope across the site and the direction of the slope of paved areas;
2. Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope;
3. The methods by detail how water harvesting or storm water runoff is used to benefit planting areas on the site.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
06/25/2018 KELLY LEE PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved Good Afternoon,

DP18-0120 1333 E DRACHMAN/ 1ST Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing.



The address will be 1333 E Drachman St with Building and Unit Numbers as shown on the Site Plan (sheet 4).

All other addresses will be retired upon Approval of this Development Package by the City of Tucson.



Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,



Robin Freiman

Addressing Official

Pima County Development Services Department

201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 724-7570
06/25/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
06/26/2018 JOHN VAN WINKLE ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DP18-0120

1) Add note on plans "Available landscaped areas to be depressed 6" for rain water harvesting"
2) The Mabel Street Flood Plain is within 50' of the south-west property corner. While this City of Tucson Mapped Flood Plain does not impact the site, update the drainage report and development package to show the boundary of the Mabel Street Flood Plain. Reference City of Tucson Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.8.I. See following link
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/pdfs/03-report-Mabel.pdf
3) Per City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.1.A, provide a pedestrian circulation path connection to Mountain Avenue

John Van Winkle, P.E.
John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
06/27/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Name:
This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop:
1) Corrected plan set
2) Items requested by review staff
Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,
2_plan_set.pdf
2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle.
Thank you,
Kelly Lee
Lead Planner
Planning & Development Services
(520) 837-6999

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
08/03/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed