Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP18-0107
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/06/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/06/2018 | KELLY LEE | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approved | September 5, 2018 Alexandra Hines Lead Planner City of Tucson Public Works Buildings - 201 North Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ. 85701 RE: DP18-0107 / Tres Pueblos Este FLD/ 2nd Submittal, Received August 24, 2018 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP18-0107, Tres Pueblos Este FLD, 2nd Submittal, a development package application for a tentative plat for an approximately 36.6 acre site located on the northeast corner of the intersection of South Tucson Boulevard and East Bilby Road. The proposed land use is residential, established single family homes. The Tucson Airport Authority acknowledges that the development of a residential use is allowed on this project site since it is currently zoned as Low Density Residential (R-1) and is in compliance with the City of Tucson's Compatible Use Zone 2 (CUZ-2) overlay. The Tucson Airport Authority continues to object to this project since it is a new residential use in the immediate vicinity of the Tucson International Airport that will have residents who will be impacted by future aircraft operations and noise. The Tucson Airport Authority is satisfied with the 2nd submittal of the project and has no additional comments to submit. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Senior Airport Planner cc MS file |
| 09/10/2018 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | Keynote #10 on the Tentative Plat Sheets still indicates a 10' paved shared-use pathway. Detail H/5 and the Landscape Plans correctly indicate a 12' paved path. Please revise keynote #10 on all tentative plat sheets. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/13/2018 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP18-0107 Tres Pueblos Este / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing however please note the following: Proposed street names need to be submitted to addressing@pima.gov for review. Street names must be approved by Pima County Addressing prior to Final Plat approval per Pima County Zoning Code 18.69.050.2.i. Reference Pima County Zoning Code 18.83.040.D for street naming guidelines. Even though Addressing approved the street names shown on this Tentative Plat in 2005 they are only reserved for 1 year. S05-134 is an expired project with the City of Tucson and COT Tentative Plat approval expires 3 years from the date of approval if a final plat has not been approved and recorded. E Calle Joya De Ventura is an Acceptable street name as it is an alignment with the existing street. The remaining street names must be submitted with Foreign language review provided per Pima County Zoning Code 18.83.040.D.4 prior to Final Plat approval. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 09/14/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/14/2018 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | project site is over 1 mile from Interstate 10 |
| 09/18/2018 | EHAMBLI1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Elisa Hamblin, AICP Lead Planner PROJECT: Tres Pueblos Este Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0107 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 18, 2018 DUE DATE: September 20, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 10, 2019. 1. Previous comment 5. For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. Per TSM 2-06.4.9.V, gang mailbox locations must be shown on the tentative plat submittal 2. Previous comment 6. The boundary between the FLD subdivision and the standard R-1 subdivision is considered a site boundary. Add a general note stating "Due to their location at the edge of the FLD site boundary, perimeter yards for lots 31, 32, 62, 63, 79, 80, 87 and 103 are required in accordance with the site's underlying zone." 3. Previous comment 7. Demonstrate how the proposed functional open space meets the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3. The functional open space must be located within the FLD portion of the site and is required to be conveniently located for residents of the FLD project. 4. Previous comment 11 and 12. Provide copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property and agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at elisa.hamblin@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4966. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 09/21/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0107 Pima County Regional Flood Control District Comments 1) Add note on plan sheets under "BLOCK 1": "To be dedicated to the Pima County Regional Flood Control District by Final Plat" 2) Previous Comment; Shared use path should be 12' wide and meander a little. See downstream development for example. Thank you for changing the detail. Please change the corresponding keynote. 3) Applicant states trail cannot meander because of riparian habitat. Subsequently noted by PCRFCD on the Landscape Plan that riparian mitigation is planned in Block 1, and the District does not want to be responsible for maintaining the project mitigation. Please remove mitigation area from property to be dedicated to the District. Please make it clear that no irrigation facilities will encroach into Block 1. 4) Please change General Note 21 to state that trail will be within Block 1, dedicated to PCRFCD, to be maintained by PCRFCD. 5) Please add bollards at path entrances at both ends of project. John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 09/21/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the approximate points of connection to the public sewer by the HCS for each lot. [Initial comment: Revise the site drawing to include the points of connection to the proposed sewers.] 2. Lots 1, 50, and 75 appear to require backwater valve but do not have them. Lots 28, 56, 112, 122, 124 do not appear to need backwater valves but are shown as having them. Verify which lots will require the installation of backwater valves.[Initial comment: Where the finish floor elevation will be less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Indicate which lots will require the installation of backwater valves. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0107 This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Revised Plan Set 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: Example 3 3_plan_set.pdf 3_soils_report.pdf Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |