Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP18-0097
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Trinity Temple Chapel Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 30, 2018 DUE DATE: August 03, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 03, 2019. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. Addressed. 2-06.3.6 - Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. Addressed. 2-06.4.1 - Move the owner/developer, plans designer and architect information to the right half of the cover sheet per this standard. 3. Addressed. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0097, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. This comment was not addressed. 2-06.4.3 - As a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required for the project provide the B of A case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. Addressed. 2-06.4.2.B - Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. Until the B of A is approved the DP cannot be approved.2-06.4.7.A.2 - Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, R-2 Zone, Religious use the minimum lot size is 20,000 sq. ft. A Board of Adjustment for variance is required to reduce the lot size to 7,000 sq. ft. 7. Comment not addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a B of A is required for approval of this project provide a general note on the plan listing the B of A case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. Ensure that a copy of the B of A findings, conditions and approval letter is provided with your next submittal. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. Addressed. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, R-2 Zone, Religious use the maximum lot coverage allowed is 60%. Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan, see UDC Article 6.4.3. Once a lot coverage calculation is provided additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. This comment was not addressed correctly. Provide the percentage of expansion on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan that provides the percentage of expansion. Based on plans in records there was an addition done in 1986 that I'm guessing is the 106 that is listed on sheet 1. As expansion calculations are cumulative it appears that the 25% expansion has been exceeded. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. Addressed. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for the 30th Street right-of-way (ROW). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. 2 Addressed. -06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning classification for the property north of the alley. 12. Clearly identify the short term bicycle parking on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show the location of the proposed short term bicycle parking on the plan. 13. Addressed. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & C are met. 14. Addressed. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Provide a long-term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B.1 and 7.4.9.D are met. 15. Until the B of A is approved the plan cannot be approved. 2-06.4.9.O - As building elevations have not been provided perimeter yard setbacks requirements cannot be verified. Street perimeter yard requirements per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1 and the building height provide on the DP of 10'9" the required street perimeter yard setback is 20'-0", proposed street perimeter yard setback is 13'-11". Side perimeter yard setbacks, east and west, per TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-2 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone, 10' or ¾ Height of the proposed exterior building wall. As the only height provided for the northern most addition is to ridge line, 21'-9". Base on the 21'-9" height the required perimeter yard setbacks to the east and west property lines is 16'-4". Until building elevations are provided the exact perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be verified, revised or additional comments maybe forth coming. 16. Addressed. 2-06.4.9.R - Cleary demonstrate how the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.1.A is met for this site. This required sidewalk must also meet the requirements of the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/30/2018 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/31/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Unified Development Code The expansion will not require a separate landscape plan. However, the landscape section cannot approve the Development Package until it receives zoning approval. The Development Package will include the following: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Board of Adjustment is required for approval of this project provide a general note on the plan listing the B of A case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. Ensure that a copy of the B of A findings, conditions and approval letter is provided with your next submittal. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/31/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0097 1) Ensure that Zoning Review comments are addressed. Depending on expansion calculation results additional requirements/comments may apply 2) Previous Comment 3. Per City of Tucson Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.4; show on plans the location and description of the four survey markers utilized to set the property boundary John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/19/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/19/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/19/2018 | AVAUGHN1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |