Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP18-0097
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2018 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Trinity Temple Chapel Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2018 DUE DATE: June 04, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 03, 2019. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 1. 2-06.3.6 - Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2. 2-06.4.1 - Move the owner/developer, plans designer and architect information to the right half of the cover sheet per this standard. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0097, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.3 - As a Design Development Options (DDO) is required for the project provide the DDO case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. 2-06.4.2.B - Label all streets that abut the subject property on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 6. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, R-2 Zone, Religious use the minimum lot size is 20,000 sq. ft. A Board of Adjustment for variance is required to reduce the lot size to 7,000 sq. ft. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a DDO is required for approval of this project provide a general note on the plan listing the DDO case number, date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. Once the DDO is approved and all other review agencies have approved the DP the plans will need to be stamped by the DDO review section prior to DP approval by Zoning. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 8. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Per UDC TABLE 6.3-2.B: EXCEPTIONS TO THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, R-2 Zone, Religious use the maximum lot coverage allowed is 60%. Provide a lot coverage calculation on the plan, see UDC Article 6.4.3. Once a lot coverage calculation is provided additional comments maybe forth coming. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan that provides the percentage of expansion. Based on plans in records there was an addition done in 1986 that I'm guessing is the 106 that is listed on sheet 1. As expansion calculations are cumulative it appears that the 25% expansion has been exceeded. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 10. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for the 30th Street right-of-way (ROW). 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 11. 2-06.4.9.F - Provide the zoning classification for the property north of the alley. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show the location of the proposed short term bicycle parking on the plan. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Provide a short-term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B & C are met. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Provide a long-term bicycle parking space detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Sections 7.4.9.B.1 and 7.4.9.D are met. 15. 2-06.4.9.O - As building elevations have not been provided perimeter yard setbacks requirements cannot be verified. Street perimeter yard requirements per UDC Article 6.4.5.C.1 and the building height provide on the DP of 10'9" the required street perimeter yard setback is 20'-0", proposed street perimeter yard setback is 13'-11". Side perimeter yard setbacks, east and west, per TABLE 6.3-2.A: DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE R-1, R-2, R-3, MH-1, & MH-2 ZONES, R-2 Zone, Nonres Use to Res Zone, 10' or ¾ Height of the proposed exterior building wall. As the only height provided for the northern most addition is to ridge line, 21'-9". Base on the 21'-9" height the required perimeter yard setbacks to the east and west property lines is 16'-4". Until building elevations are provided the exact perimeter yard setback requirements cannot be verified, revised or additional comments maybe forth coming. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - Cleary demonstrate how the requirements of TSM 7-01.4.1.A is met for this site. This required sidewalk must also meet the requirements of the 2012 IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/10/2018 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 06/01/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. a. If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. b. If the expansion is 50% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 50% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. Provide expansion calculations Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/04/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0097 1) Ensure that Zoning Review comments are addressed. Depending on expansion calculation results additional requirements/comments may apply 2) Sheet 1: a. Drainage Statement. Correct spelling of "Adversably" to Adversely b. Basis of Elevation. Correct spelling of "Norh" to North 3) Per City of Tucson Administrative Manual (AM) section 2-06.4.4; show on plans the location and description of the four survey markers utilized to set the property boundary John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 07/06/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/06/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |