Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0089
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/20/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/26/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Unable to determine if it is the intent of the developers to install fire sprinklers. Note 3 on sheet 6 (private utility notes) indicates private fire service mains, but I cannot find the piping. Be advised, an unsprinklered building must be with 400', AS THE HOSE LAYS, to the farthest part of the building (600' for a sprinklered building). The hydrant to the north of the building discussed in the response letter exceeds the 400' requirement. |
| 08/09/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/09/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Brake Masters - 1935 E. Broadway Boulevard Development Package (1st Review) DP18-0089 - Major Auto Service Repair and Residential Rezoning from R-2-O-3 to C-2 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2018 DUE DATE: August 16, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 17, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 10: The Parcel combo isn't only for the new acquisition; it also is requested to include the north lot with the parking area and the house. ( I believe an additional option would be to record a Lot Combo Covenant of Real Property - Contact Steve Shields for more on this option) PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: A Pima County Tax Parcel Combination is to be completed prior to approval of the DP. Clarify if the parking lot along the south west area is part of the Brake Masters parking lot and if so is the use adjacent to the new parking allowed to us the parking lot? Will there be a cross access and cross parking agreement recorded? If so provide the recorded documentation and add as a note on the DP the cross access and cross parking information. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: Please clarify, will there be a new TEP easement recorded prior to approval of the DP or is the easement being recorded after the final stage of development is completed? PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: As acquisition of property for the Broadway widening occurs, will new utility easements be required over the development site? If so add the new or proposed easements as noted by the standard below. Label the easement type and recordation information. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 15: As of this second DP review the TSMR has not been approved or denied. Once the TSMR is approved list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Add as a general note the TSMR case number date of approval and conditions of approval. PREVIOUS COMMENT 15: Demonstrate how the access to the parking lot on the north side of the new building and the new parking lot area along the south side of the existing building will be provided. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 16: As of this second DP review the PDMR has not been approved or denied. Once the PDMR is approved list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Add as a general note the TSMR case number date of approval and conditions of approval. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16: All PAAL areas must be designed with a minimum of 24 feet in width. The north parking lot indicates a 20 foot PAAL. The minimum required is 24 feet. A section of the PAAL along the south side of the new building is 19.4 feet. The minimum width required is 24 feet. Label the width of the west and north parking lot PAALS on sheet 4. Why is there a transitional ABC path to the parking lot still shown in Phase II? Clarify if TDOT is allowing the continued use of the area once the site is completed and if so provide the documentation from TDOT. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 17: Draw and label the parking area for the existing residence as requested per the previous comment. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17: The south parking in Phase II includes a dashed line behind the parking spaces. The dashed line is not included in the symbols legend and it is not clear what the dashed line is intended to depict. Clarify if there is a proposal to provide covered parking for these parking spaces? Show the required parking spaces for the residential use. The spaces shall be on the residential site. Include in the parking calculations the number of spaces required and provided for the residential use. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 22: It's not clear that the response memo to the civil comments addressed any of the conditions of rezoning. Include in the next submittal a memo stating how the conditions of the rezoning have been addressed. PREVIOUS COMMENT 22: Include with the next DP submittal a separate response letter stating how all conditions of rezoning have been addressed. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 08/10/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Zoning comments and required revisions are addressed. Any changes to site plan should be reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 08/10/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/14/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Pending approval of DS18-16. Engineering can conduct an over the counter "electronic review" once DS18-16 has been approved and the plans updated accordingly. |
| 08/16/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 08/20/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0089 This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Revised Plan Set 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: Example 3 (third submittal): 3_plan_set.pdf 3_soils_report.pdf Kelly Lee Lead Planner Planning & Development Services (520) 837-6999 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/13/2018 | KLEE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |