Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0071
Parcel: 11307243A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0071
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/04/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/23/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved Emergency egress at northwest corner of parking lot dicussed with and approved by Glenn D'Auria.
04/25/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Mountain Adelaide - 60 Unit Multi-Family FLD
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0071 - R-2 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 25, 2018
DUE DATE: May 2, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 28, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. COMMENT: Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: The Legend on sheet one appears to include the same line type for existing and new easements. Clarify if the is just an error or will the line types be used for both existing and new easements? (It is suggested that the line types not be the same for the existing and new eqasments.)


2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted;

3. COMMENT: Include the following in the title block of all plan sheets; "A 60 Unit Multi-Family FLD Development".


2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0071, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes
2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

5. COMMENT: Revise general note to state the use is for a "Multi-family Development" rather than family dwelling.


2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

6. COMMENT: It is recommended that a Block Plat be processed to eliminate the recorded lots and lot lines. Contact Steve Shields for additional information.


For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

7. COMMENT: Under general note 5, list the square footage of each unit and the number of units in each building. Also list the actual building footprint square footage.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

8. COMMENT: The percentage of building and accessory coverage cannot be verified until the information requested in comment 7 is provided.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

9. COMMENT: For clarification, per response indicate if there are any existing or proposed easements on, over or under the overall site.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

10. COMMENT: Due to the gated entry on Mountain Avenue (MSR roadway) a turnaround will be required. See the PDSD Engineering review comments related to gated entries.


2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: Label the width of the south PAAL.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

12. COMMENT: Draw and label the two and one-half overhang area for the west, south and east parking spaces that abut landscape areas. No landscaping can be within the two and one-half overhang area. The 18 foot clear dimension for the parking spaces must be clearly defined.


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

13. COMMENT: The proposed short term facility depicted on sheet 6 is not an approved type. See Article 7 figure 7.4.9.B.2 for allowed types. (If this is a type of the facility that the developer wants to utilize approval from the Bicycle coordinator would be required if it can be demonstrated that the proposed design meets the requirements for security.) Also check with Steve Shields to make sure that a separate process is not required to use an unapproved facility.


2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

14. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

15. COMMENT: Revise the building setback along the Mountain Avenue frontage to show the setback measured from the existing and future back of curb. Add a note or dimension for the on-street parking lane on Adelaide Drive.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

16. COMMENT: The pedestrian path (sidewalk) shall be extended to the Dumpster location, Technical Standards 7-01.3.3.B.


2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and,

17. COMMENT: Add the calculation as noted by the standard above.


2-06.5.3 Additional Information
The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable:

2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

18. COMMENT: Demonstrate compliance with the Standard above in order to utilize the Maximum Density Bonus.


2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space
Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations;

19. COMMENT: Delineate for clarity the Functional Open areas and label the sf of each area.


2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

20. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.


2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan
When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows:

21. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.


2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and,

22. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.

2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.

23. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.


2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan
When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:

24. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.

2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation;

25. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.

2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and,

26. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.


2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

27. COMMENT: Refer to the Design Professional comments related to this standard.



If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/25/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
04/25/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved Date: April 21, 2018
From: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
To: Kelly Lee, Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD)
Re: Design Professional review comments for Mountain Adeladie FLD.
After review, based upon Unified development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3M.1 - M.4, of the required plans and documents submitted to PDSD, I recommend approval of this project.
With Regards,
Rick Gonzalez
COT DP
04/27/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
04/30/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS
When Required
Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1.

The landscape plan shall include the following:

Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)

Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements

If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

Identify screening elements on landscape plan.

Detention and Retention Basins
To the greatest degree practicable, detention and retention basins within an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space by incorporating the Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines described in Chapter IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, the Floodplain Ordinance, and in accordance with UDC Section 7.6.6.C, Stormwater Runoff.

2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space
Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations;

Delineate on the landscape plan the Functional Open areas.

5.11 Conflicts with Utilities and Solar Access
Trees and shrubs must be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements or with solar access, as defined in Section 11.4.20 of the Unified Development Code, to an adjacent property (see Figure 5-D, Conflicts with Utilities and Solar Access).

Verify that no conflict with 20' easement to the East indicated on sheet 5 of 18.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
05/03/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. (UDC 7.6.6.C.2) Provide curb cuts and other features to direct runoff to landscape areas where possible.
2. Sites along Major Streets and Routes must be designed so vehicles do not back up onto the MS&R but will be able to maneuver on site. Provide a turnaround outside of the gate.
3. Show in the Drainage Statement that the project will not cause adverse impacts to nearby properties. Provide an encroachment analysis showing no increase in water surface greater than 0.1 foot.
4. Add a note indicating the property is affected by floodplain and that floodplain use permits are required.
5. Clearly label the existing contour elevations.
05/07/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0071

This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd:
1) Revised Plan Set
2) All approved documents submitted previously
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example:


Example 2 (second submittal):
2_plan_set.pdf
2_soils_report.pdf

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/07/2018 KLEE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed