Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0060
Parcel: 99999999A

Address:
8525 E 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP18-0060
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/23/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/26/2018 KELLY LEE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Needs Review AVP & PMP Deferred to Building Permit
03/26/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
03/26/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
03/26/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
04/16/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
04/18/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***The attachment can be viewed in documents table on PRO.***

DP18-0060 Arroyo Reserve FLD/ 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
04/18/2018 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Reqs Change Regarding Note 17 of the Development Package Cover Sheet: In 2010 the "Pima Regional Trails System Master Plan" ( https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/parks/docs/capital/prtsmaster.pdf ) superseded the "Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan". Per the PRTSMP, the section of the Robb Wash adjacent to this parcel is designated as P033 - Robb Wash Path. See page 55 of the PRTSMP for the standards and requirements regarding the development of a "Path". These standards include the construction of a 12' wide concrete or asphalt paved multi-use path. Please update the 6' decomposed granite trail shown on the Development and Landscape Plans on the west bank of the Robb Wash to conform to the current standard.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
04/19/2018 MMORENO1 H/C SITE REVIEW Passed
04/19/2018 MMORENO1 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael Moreno
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: Arroyo Reserve
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0060

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 20, 2108
DUE DATE: April 23, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 20, 2019.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Additional Comment: 2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically.

2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

2. COMMENT:

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

3. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0060, adjacent to the title block on each sheet and provide the correct address for the proposed development site.

The administrative address listed does not seem to be correct, it appears that the address on the cover sheet applies to the property across 22nd Street. The administrative address must be listed on all sheets next to the title block.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project.

5. COMMENT: Once the final plat case number has been assigned, please list it as reference next the title block of all sheets.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions

The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

7. COMMENT: If applicable, draw and label all existing easements.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

8. COMMENT: Please provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

9. COMMENT: Please provide the information noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

10. COMMENT: The proposed streets do not include parking on both sides of the streets. Design all interior streets to include parking on both sides of the streets.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

11. COMMENT: Clarify whether or not the two parking spaces for each dwelling will be located on site.

2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

12. COMMENT: Contact City of Tucson Real Estate Department and enquire on the process to vacate or abandoned dedicated interior street right-of-way per the previous plat.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

13. COMMENT: Provide the information for the future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc. for 22nd Street. Add the dimension from the existing and future curb to property line along 22nd Street.


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

14. COMMENT: Please provide a dimensioned detailed drawing on sheet 5 that demonstrates compliance with the street building setback for the 5 lots along 22nd Street.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

15. COMMENT:

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

16. COMMENT: Add the sidewalk connection from the southeast entrance of the accessible ramp on 22nd Street to the new street side walk along the new street entrance, next to lot 39.

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS)

2-06.5.3.A. Reduced Perimeter Yards
Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis;

17. COMMENT: See related comment 14.

2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option
Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate;

18. COMMENT: Please list the allowed and proposed density calculation on the cover sheet.

2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations
Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits;

19. COMMENT: Please provide the preliminary elevation drawings with the next submittal.

2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan
When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows:

20. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and,

21. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC.

22. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments for the architectural variation plan.

2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan
When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:

23. COMMENT: Refer to design professionals review comments.

2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation;

24. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and,

25. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above

2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots;

26. COMMENT: If applicable provide the information noted by the standard above

2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property.

27. COMMENT: If available provide CC&R's with the next submittal or submitted with the final plat.

28. COMMENT: Under the tabulation text block revise the R-4 classification to R-1.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/20/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Reqs Change Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed the development plan/tentative plat submitted on March 26, 2018 and is unable to approve at this time. Existing TEP overhead facilities along the northern portion of the development need to be shown on the plans, as well as existing TEP underground facilities adjacent to Lot 18 of the plans.

Also please note in the Title Block that this is a resubdivision of Barrio Arroyo, Book 64 Page 76.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744.

Thanks,

Mary Burke
Right of Way Agent III
Tucson Electric Power Co.
Land Resources – RC 131
3950 E. Irvington Road
Tucson, AZ 85714-2114
Office - 520-917-8744
Cell - 520-401-9895
mburke@tep.com
04/23/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
04/23/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

The following information must be provided on the plans.
Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
c. Nature of screening material (e.g., permanent or temporary as in phased development); and,
d. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material).

Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD.
6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials:
a. Tile;
b. Stone;
c. Brick;
d. Adobe;
e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or,
f. Metal.

Verify the following information is provided on the landscape plans:
8.7.3. FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD)
Detention and Retention Basins
1. To the greatest degree practicable, detention and retention basins within an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space by incorporating the Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines described in Chapter IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, the Floodplain Ordinance, and in accordance with UDC Section 7.6.6.C, Stormwater Runoff. Functional Open Space amenities within detention and retention basins may count toward meeting Functional Open Space requirements; and, developed in accordance with Section 7.11, Detention and Retention Basins.

Landscaping Requirements
1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section.
2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall:
a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and,
b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas.
3. Landscape plans shall incorporate water-conserving design as defined in Section 7.6.6, Use of Water, and as described in the Technical Standards Manual.
4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval.
Additional comments may apply.
04/25/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Revise the site utility drawing to show the locations of the proposed sanitary manholes (the manholes are noted but no manholes are shown).
2. Clarify the boxed elevation note on the grading and paving plan: is it the pad elevation or the proposed first floor elevations for the buildings (FFE)?
3. Show the proposed point of connection to the sewer for each lot.
4. Based on the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole and the first floor elevation, determine the need for a backwater valve for each lot per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
04/25/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Identify the floodplain boundary in the legend. Label the floodplain on all sheets showing the boundaries.
2. The dimensions on River Reserve don't match the referenced detail (B/5). The detail indicates parking on one side. With 33 feet of pavement and two feet of wedge curb, there is space for parking on both sides of the street: two 10-foot travel lanes and two 7-foot parking lanes for 34 feet.
3. The scaled width of the motor courts south of River Reserve doesn't match the dimensions in the referenced detail (C/5). Label the dimensions of the motor courts. With 32 feet of pavement and wedge curb, two parking lanes may be accommodated.
4. Sheet 3 is labelled as preliminary grading and drainage. This was submitted as tentative plat and grading. Revise the title to remove the "preliminary." The sheet index should also be changed.
5. Show existing and proposed grades on the grading plan sheets.
6. The introduction of the drainage report describes a different project than this one. Revise the introduction and all other sections as necessary to be applicable to this project.
7. The FEMA delineation of the floodplain affects much more of the project site than indicated by the plan sheets. Show the existing FEMA delineation as shown on the FIRM panels. If the floodplain boundary is to be changed in the course of this project, a LOMR will be required. Until the LOMR is approved, the existing delineation will be used for permitting and compliance. Show the proposed delineation as proposed.
8. Provide an encroachment analysis for the fill required to reduce the extent of the floodplain. Show no adverse impact on adjacent and nearby properties.
9. Provide security barriers for the basins that are greater than 2 feet deep and the side slopes are steeper than 4:1. Note that where the water depths are less than 2 feet but the top of the basin is more than 2 feet above the basin bottom the barrier will be required unless a weir or other overflow structure is provided to ensure water depths less than 2 feet.
10. Clearly identify the boundaries of the basin in the southwest corner of the project. If the boundary is a retaining wall, demonstrate that the wall amounts to less than 35 per cent of the basin perimeter per page 79 of the retention/detention manual.
11. If the basin perimeter makes use of retaining walls, provide geotechnical evaluation of the foundation in soils subject to inundation.
12. Provide a complete SWPPP including a SWPPP site map showing best management practices.
13. Identify the purpose for each common area.
14. Provide representative dimensions and cross section for each basin as well as other features on the site such as the slope adjacent to Palm Tree Drive Wash.
04/27/2018 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved See Water Availability Letter in SIRE.
04/27/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd




1) Revised Plan Set

2) All approved documents submitted previously

4) All items requested by review staff

5) All items needed to approve these plans






Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example:





Example 2 (second submittal):

2_plan_set.pdf

2_soils_report.pdf




To see reviewer's comments about your plans, please visit the Development Services web site at
https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/activity_search
You will need to enter the activity number shown above (DP18-0060) to see comments about the plan




Please let me know if you have any questions.




Thank you,




Kelly Lee

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/27/2018 KLEE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed