Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0058
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/30/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/30/2018 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | This looks good - approved. |
| 07/31/2018 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/15/2018 | KELLY LEE | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Reqs Change | Corner of 4th and 4th currently owned by COT will require an RES application submitted to Real Estate Division to Vacate and Sell or Grant an Easement to applicant. The Real Estate Division does not recommended waiting until Phase 2 to address the request for an Easement. A grant of easement must be circulated before we can approve. The request for the areal easement must be circulated to 52 plus people including all City departments, utility groups and registered neighborhood associations if any. The grant of easement average completion time ranges from 120 days to 365 days. “Former ROW Hoff Ave vacated and sold 1997 reserved flowage easement, and maintenance easement for water and utility facilities,” refers to the area that was Hoff Ave extending from the south up into the site. Sincerely, Gena Cox-Dorman Senior Property Agent City of Tucson, Real Estate Division 201 N Stone 6th Floor PO Box 27210Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 Phone: 520-837-6719 |
| 08/21/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Show the backwater valve for the building sewer serving the first floor. Show the building sewer serving the floors not requiring a backwater valve. [Initial comment: Building #2 has a first floor elevation lower than the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Provide a backwater valve in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] 2. Show the building sewer serving the floors not requiring a backwater valve. [Initial comment: Building #4 is a 3-story building. Floors discharging from above the first floor shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 08/22/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The following comments pertain to the historic review: 5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ) The relocation of Building #3 of Phase 2 will require HPZ review and approval as stated in the PAD. Contact Michael Taku at 837-4963 for additional information on the HPZ review process. List the new HPZ case number (if assigned) in the lower right corner of each sheet, and as a general note provide the date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. Ensure that all Zoning, Engineering, and comments are addressed. |
| 08/22/2018 | MCASTRO2 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Mark Castro Lead Planner PROJECT: Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0058 - The Trinity Mixed Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 22, 2018 DUE DATE: August 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 15, 2019. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. It appears that sheet references are off a page on several pages of the DP i.e., on sheet 6, keynote 19 refers to sheet 9. The correct sheet number should be 10. Also, in your response to previous comment 7, you indicate that metes and bounds have been added to sheet 3. The correct sheet should be 4. On sheet 9, the matchline reference to Phase 2 should be corrected. Ensure all references to sheet numbers are correct. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2. Follow-up to previous comment 6. Based on COT Real Estate Division comments, the RES application should be started now instead of waiting until Phase 2. Zoning approval of the CofO will be placed on hold until the easement has been recorded and documentation has been provided to PDSD. Previous comment 6. 2-06.4.8.B - Provide the recordation information for the new aerial easement. Also provide the aerial easement areas on sheet 9 as stated in keynote 19 on sheet 5. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 3. Follow-up to previous comment 10. Parking space dimensions must be provided for all spaces. Dimensions have not been provided for the spaces on the southern edge, northern portion of the center tandem island, west of the bungalow and north of the hammerhead by the bungalow. Previous comment 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Provide a parking space detail for standard parking space. There appears to be covered parking in some areas. Clarify this and provide elevation details to include the height of the covered parking. Covered parking cannot overhang more than 1' into the PAAL. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement if providing covered parking. The on-site tandem parking spaces were not discussed in the PAD. On-site parking spaces must comply with UDC Sec 7.4.6. 4. Follow-up to previous comment 13. Under General Notes, add a note that says, "The relocation of Building #3 of Phase 2 will require HPZ review and approval as stated in the PAD." Previous comment 13. 2-06.4.9.O - The relocation of Building #3 of Phase 2 will require HPZ review and approval as stated in the PAD. Contact Michael Taku at 837-4963 for additional information on the HPZ review process. List the new HPZ case number (if assigned) in the lower right corner of each sheet, and as a general note provide the date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Mark Castro, (520) 837-4979 or Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 08/22/2018 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP18-0058 The Trinity Mixed Use / 2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Official Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment |
| 08/22/2018 | MCASTRO2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 08/22/2018 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 08/24/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/24/2018 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 08/28/2018 | MCASTRO2 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/29/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Plan Returned for Corrections Notice: DP18-0058 This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. View the comments on www.tucsonaz.gov/pro and search by activity number. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd:1) Revised Plan Set2) All items requested by review staff3) All items needed to approve these plans Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: Example third submittal:3_plan_set.pdf3_comment_response _letter.pdf Thank you, Alexandra Hines |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/29/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |