Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP18-0058
Parcel: 11703321F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP18-0058
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/16/2018 KELLY LEE START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/20/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed
03/20/2018 KLEE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Passed
03/20/2018 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed
03/20/2018 KELLY LEE OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
03/20/2018 KELLY LEE UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
03/21/2018 JPEELDA1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Fire department access - needs to be minimum 20'
Approved ariel fire apparatus access roads shall be provided. at least one of the required routes shall be located within a minimum of 15' and a maximum of 30' from the building.
Dead ends in excess of 150 ft shall be provided with width and turn around provisions in accordance with table D103.4
Please show the location of the fire hydrants
04/02/2018 GARY WITTWER COT NON-DSD TDOT Reqs Change I assume this will come in as a PIA as some point.

Landscape looks O.K. to me, but you will need to add the attached notes to the plans. Let me know if you have any questions,

Gary 837-6618

City of Tucson
Department of Transportation
Standard Notes for Planting in ROW

1. It is the owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section.
2. It is the owner responsibility to keep a 5' wide by 7' tall clear pedestrian access open across the entire property.
3. It is the owner responsible to keep vegetation from growing past the curb line clear, and keep a 15' high clear zone over the travel lane.
4. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements.
5. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair.
6. The owner takes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities.
7. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW are lateral lines, tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment must be on private property. (excluding water meter)
8. Contractor to obtain a Right Of Way permit prior to construction within the right-of-way.
04/09/2018 CLAURIE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Denied Development package cannot be reviewed and approved until IID design package is approved. Provide the design review decision letter at the time of submittal.
04/12/2018 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change April 12, 2018
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP18-0058
PROJECT NAME: Trinity Block Mixed Use
PROJECT ADDRESS: 400 E University
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT


Work within the right of way will require a Private Improvement Agreement with the City of Tucson Engineering TDOT.

Page 5 of 21. Eliminate bollards within the right of way (driveway) replace with concrete curb and object markers.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov
04/12/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP18-0058 The Trinity Mixed Use 4/12/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Denial
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 4/12/2018

COMMENTS

The Trinity Mixed Use is located at 20 E. Congress Street. The Trinity Mixed Use is located at 20 E. Congress Street. The Trinity is currently in its 1st submittal and is being reviewed for DP18-0015. It appears that there has been some modifications to the parking and building reconfigurations to the Preliminary development Plan with the relocation of the historic building on the southeast corner of the property. The Trinity Mixed Use is subject to rezoning C9-16-12 and is subject to all conditions listed in the Trinity PAD (H) rezoning document. The Trinity Pad states:
J. Design Review and Standards

1. Design review
Design review shall be conducted by the IID Design Review Committee (DRC) for compliance with the relevant Development Standards in Section 3 of this PAD (H) (including landscape, parking, water harvesting, paving, and hardscape) and additional Trinity Design Guidelines (as provided in PAD (H) Section J. 3) . The Trinity Design Guidelines will prepared by the development team subsequent to PAD (H) approval and will be submitted to the IID DRC for review and approval.
Proposed new development shall be reviewed as follows:
a. Proposed development shall be reviewed for HPZ compliance prior to review by the IID DRC.
b. The IID DRC shall review all proposed new development for compliance with the relevant Development Standards in Section 3 of this PAD (H) and the Trinity Design Guidelines.
c. The IID DRC will provide a letter of recommendation to the PDSD Director prior to development package approval advising whether the design conforms to the relevant sections of the PAD(H) and Trinity Design Guidelines.

C. The IID DRCs authority shall include the following:

1. Review and approve the Trinity Design Guidelines
2. Review and approve the design for new development within the PAD(H) District consistent with the relevant sections of the PAD(H) and Trinity Design Guidelines
3. Provide a letter of recommendation to the City at the time of development plan submittal advising whether the design conforms to the PAD(H) and Trinity Design Guidelines
04/16/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***Attachment can be viewed in documents table on PRO.***

DP18-0058 Trinity / 1st Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments. Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
04/16/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA
Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040
Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
04/18/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
Cross-reference to:
" Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
The following comments pertain to the historic review:
5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ)
Landscaping
Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review.
The following comments pertain to PAD-31 document:
2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of PAD.
Pocket Parks
A pocket park is a small outdoor area for public leisure with shade and opportunities for gathering that bring the neighborhood into contact with the natural world. Indicate pocket park location and if meets criteria.
Internal Landscape
Internal landscape on site will provide shade for pedestrians along walkways within the property lines and provide shade for automobiles as well. Landscape and retention areas will be integrated within the parking areas. Identify retention atreas.
Trees along the modern streetcar route along 4th Avenue, University Boulevard and 4th Street will require approval by TDOT Landscape Architect, a Right-of-way Use Permit and a Sunlink Track Access and as such are not subject to UDC Section 7.6. Obtain permission for use of ROW

Screening
Screening materials shall include masonry, solid and perforated steel paneling or trellis, vegetation and or combination thereof. Identify screening elements on landscape plan.

Paving and Hardscape
Paving and hardscape elements, on site and in right of way, shall have the opportunity to use alternative paving in lieu of UDC requirements per the Design team. Verify that hardscape & paving materials are appropriate.
Ensure that all Zoning, Engineering, and Transportation comments are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
04/18/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change ***View attachments in documents table on PRO.***

Real Estate Division Review Comments

Site Plan Keynote 34 Corner of 4th and 4th currently owned by COT will require an RES application submitted to Real Estate Division to Vacate and Sell or Grant an Easement to applicant.

Former ROW Hoff Ave vacated and sold 1997 (deed attached) reserved flowage easement, and maintenance easement for water and utility facilities.

Sincerely,
Gena Cox-Dorman
Senior Property Agent
City of Tucson, Real Estate Division
201 N Stone 6th Floor
PO Box 27210Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210

Phone: 520-837-6719
04/19/2018 MCASTRO2 ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Mark Castro
Lead Planner

PROJECT:
Development Package (1st Review)
DP18-0058 - The Trinity Mixed Use

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2018

DUE DATE: April 18, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 15, 2019.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP18-0058, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2. 2-06.4.4.B - In the location map on the cover sheet, label all streets that abut the subject property and label West University Wash.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

3. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Add the rezoning case number C9-16-13 in the lower right corner of each sheet.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - See comment number 3.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

6. 2-06.4.8.B - Provide the recordation information for the new aerial easement. Also provide the aerial easement areas on sheet 9 as stated in keynote 19 on sheet 5.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

7. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. The proposed lot line reconfiguration must be completed and recorded prior to the approval of the DP. List the assigned S number in the lower right corner of each sheet and provide documentation when completed.

8. 2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. A 15' height clearance is required where the building will overhang. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a -Provide a parking space detail for standard parking space. There appears to be covered parking in some areas. Clarify this and provide elevation details to include the height of the covered parking. Covered parking cannot overhang more than 1' into the PAAL. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement if providing covered parking. The on-site tandem parking spaces were not discussed in the PAD. On-site parking spaces must comply with UDC Sec 7.4.6.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Short-term bicycle parking must be within 50' of each public entrance to a building as measured along the most direct pedestrian access route. Demonstrate compliance with this requirement.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required.

13. 2-06.4.9.O - The relocation of Building #3 of Phase 2 will require HPZ review and approval as stated in the PAD. Contact Michael Taku at 837-4963 for additional information on the HPZ review process. List the new HPZ case number (if assigned) in the lower right corner of each sheet, and as a general note provide the date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

14. 2-06.4.9.R - On sheet 5, show where pedestrian access is provided from the parking area in the center to the buildings. On sheet 11, clarify that there is a minimum 4' wide walkway between the face of the bollards and edge of walkway.

15. 2-06.4.9.T - Show vehicle maneuverability and access route fully dimensioned for front-load dumpster service.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Mark Castro, (520) 837-4979 or Mark.Castro@tucsonaz.gov
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/19/2018 MCASTRO2 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments.
04/20/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Building #2 has a first floor elevation lower than the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole. Provide a backwater valve in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
2. Building #4 is a 3-story building. Floors discharging from above the first floor shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
3. Building #1 notes a FFE of 2301.9; is this correct?
04/23/2018 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Harvey Brown asks us to make the following comment: The onsite circulation doesn't allow for adequate fire apparatus access. Provide 18-foot radii for PAAL intersections. Ensure adequate fire access. Discuss the layout with Harvey before resubmittal.
2. Clearly indicate that the building overhanging the vehicle use area will have a minimum 15-foot clearance.
3. Add a note to the plan indicating that a track access permit may be required for any work adjacent to the streetcar route.
4. On sheet 5 there is a callout for keynote 4 that seems to be misplaced. Correct this callout and ensure all others are also correct.
5. On sheet 5, keynote 40 says it is not used. However, a callout referencing keynote 40 appears on the plan. Please correct.
04/27/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop:
1) Corrected plan set
2) Items requested by review staff

Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal,
2_plan_set.pdf
2_swppp_report.pdf

and the plans will re-enter the review cycle.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/27/2018 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed