Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0037
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/07/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: El Sur Restaurant - (Food Service) Development Package (4th Review) DP18-0037 - C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 7, 2019 DUE DATE: November 25, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 9, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) **** "Please address the following comments which are related to the previous zoning comments and meeting with PDSD staff Owner and Corrales Engineering Firm Staff which included discussion on the Board Of Adjustment modifications that were requested for a variance. In addition, the revised DP submitted has been reviewed to verify corrections and compliance with the B of A variances requested and conditions of approval of C10-19-17. COMMENTS: 1. Comment: Remove the PDSD stamp from all plan sheets. PDSD staff will apply the approval stamp and signatures once the DP is approved. 2. Comment: Revise the Variance notes on sheet 1 to include the variances requested as noted on the Board of Adjustment decision document dated October 30, 2019. The B of A approval included conditions A, B, C, and D, List the conditions under the B of A note. 3. Comment: The vehicle parking requirements for this overall project site is 30 spaces which includes 2 ADA spaces. The overall site has been provided with 27 spaces by utilizing the allowed exceptions per UDC 7.4.5.E.2 and .3. The reduction for one of the vehicle parking spaces is based on providing a total of 6 additional long term facilities. Five of the long term facilities are depicted on the plan, 2 in long term boxes and 3 in the Building for the Office Use. Five additional long term facilities are required and must be depicted on sheet 2 of the DP. If any of the remaining 5 long term facilities are to be provided within the restaurant building A or building B draw and label the location(s). Building C has not been provided with the required short term facilities. Two of the four short term facilities must be relocated to be within fifty feet of the public entrance to building C. 4. Comment: The following three items have not been addressed and were not included in the B of A application for approval. a. - UDC Section 7.4.6 table 7.4.6-1 - The width of the new two-way PAAL area east of the ADA parking space must be a minimum of 24 feet. Due to the requirement for a new sidewalk between the PAAL and the Building, the PAAL has been reduced to 21 feet. A PDMR approval is required. b. - T.S. Section 7.4.3.A. Width - The new sidewalk must be a minimum of four feet wide, constructed of Portland cement and physically separated from the vehicle use area. Per the plan the width of the sidewalk is three feet but it is not clear of the sidewalk is to raised or if an extruded curb is proposed as the barrier, clarify. A TSMR approval is required. c. - 2-06.4.7.A.6 - As a general note (on the cover sheet), list the TSMR/PDMR application case number, date, and any conditions of approval. In addition the case number must be listed next to the title block of all sheets. 5. Comment: Per condition 3 of the B of A approval, a Registered Landscape Architect must prepare a landscape plan and shall be included in the DP package. Assure that the information on the landscape plan title block is consistent with the info on the DP sheets. Revise the sheet index and sheet numbers accordingly. 6. Comment: 2-06.4.1 - On the cover sheet list the name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 7. Comment: Correct the typo for the Word "Development" in the title block of all plan sheets. 8. Comment: Previous zoning comments may be reviewed at the following link - https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pro/pdsd/permitdetail/DP18-0037/131100080 If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/08/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The Development Package will contain the following on each sheet: Any other relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Revise the Variance notes on sheet 1 to include the variances requested as noted on the Board of Adjustment decision document dated October 30, 2019. The B of A approval included conditions A, B, C, and D, List the conditions under the B of A note. Condition C. Indicates "Landscape plan to be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect". Submit appropriate landscape plan for review. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 12/03/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE - A resubmittal is required. Permit/Activity Number: DP18-0037 Include this number on all future correspondence. Project Description: SITE - El Sur Restaurant, outdoor dining. Project Manager: Steve.Shields@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4956 Fee Balance: $0 (zero). To view documents and Reviewer's comments: www.tucsonaz.gov/pro (If information is not available, check back later as data transfers to PRO periodically.) - Home page, left side, “Activity Search”, enter the Activity Number - Permits section, click on blue tab - Documents section, click on blue icon to the right of each document - Reviews section, click on "Review Details" Submit the following items to the Filedrop. In the Project Description field, enter the Activity Number. PDSD Filedrop: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd 1) Comment Response Letter (your response to the reviewer's “Requires Change” comments) 2) Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other documents requested by review staff 4) Name your 6th submittal documents accordingly, for example: 6_Plan_Set Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
| 12/03/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | TSMR approval is required prior to approval of the development package |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/03/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |