Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP18-0037
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2019 | SBEASLE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/25/2019 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/08/2019 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Provide variance case number, decision information and any conditions imposed. The following are comments from previous review are pertaining to variance request: 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Vehicular Use Areas The standards in this Section 7.6.4.B apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces. Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas General Standards Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Street Landscape Borders Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. Dimension street landscape border. One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points. Vegetative Ground Cover Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting. 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 30" screen is required to screen vehicle use area from Laguna St. A 5' wall is required to screen entire commercial development from adjacent residential properties. Irrigation A water-conserving irrigation system is required for all new landscape plantings. For sites that are larger than one acre and on which the gross floor area of all buildings is more than 10,000 square feet, an underground irrigation system is required. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 07/09/2019 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: El Sur Restaurant - (Food Service) Development Package (4th Review) DP18-0037 - C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2019 DUE DATE: July 11, 2019 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 9, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) **** "Please address the follow up comments which are related to the previous zoning comments that were not addressed in its entirety or required additional follow up." Follow Up To Previous Comment 5: The previous comment will remain until the Board of Adjustment process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. The B of A case number must be listed as reference case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5: This project will require B of A approval for multiple code deficient regulations prior to approval of the DP. Once the B of A process has been completed the DP will have to be resubmitted for review. Typically the DP is revised to address all the reviewer's comments and the only comments that remain would be related to variance requests. Be sure to include as a general note the B of A case number, date of approval and conditions of approval on the cover sheet. List the B of A case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. Follow up To Previous Comment 10: The previous comment will remain until the PDMR process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: The current developments are considered non-conforming but due to a greater than 25% expansion in building area or restaurant use area and lot area the site will have to be brought into current UDC development regulations. Access onto the parking spaces that are fronting on the frontage road will have to be removed or approval through a Board of Adjustment variance application will be required. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: The previous comment will remain until the PDMR process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: The PAAL in the south parking lot does not appear that it will meet the minimum width of 24 feet. Once the required 4-foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to the building is provided the width of the PAAL will be less than 24 feet. A PDMR would be required to allow a PAAL width less than 24 feet. Follow Up To Previous Comment 13: The previous comment will remain until the Board of Adjustment process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13: Revise the Accessible parking spaces details to match the proposed accessible parking areas on the site or revise the drawing to match the detail drawings. Because this s is a full code compliance review and the future roadway will be an issue for allowing the backing out of parked vehicles onto 22nd Street, a Board of Adjustment variance may be required. The variance may also be required to allow the continued direct access into a parking space from a major street. The remaining Zoning comments or follow up comments can be addressed on the next submittal after the Board of Adjustment process has been completed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/15/2019 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0037 1) Follow up on previous comment 3. Provide a copy of the approval from City of Tucson Environmental Services for proposed trash enclosure. 2) Follow up on comment 8. Original previous comments 5,6 and 13 will remain until a TSMR has been submitted for review John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 07/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PLAN RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS NOTICE The reviews have been completed and a resubmittal is required. Fee Balance: $289.30 (see the Balance column in the image below). NOTE: We now have an online payment option – it’s available for some permits (not all). Below is the link. If unable to use this option, you may pay in person or mail a payment. Please pay the total fees, or Review Fees at a minimum, at the permit counter (Mon-Fri, 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM) or mail a check (payable to City of Tucson – address is shown below) prior to the completion of the first review. Include the Activity Number on your check. Link to Online Payments, City of Tucson: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/online-resources-fees-maps-records Not case-sensitive but a hyphen is needed, e.g.: dp19-0000 Simply type in your Permit Nbr. and press enter on your keyboard. Activity/Permit Number: DP18-0037 Project Description: SITE - El Sur Restaurant, outdoor dining. Project Manager: Steve.Shields@TucsonAz.gov, (520) 837-4956 For review comments, visit PRO at www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO, then search by Activity Number. (If information isn't shown yet, check back later as data flows to PRO periodically throughout the day.) Please name your 5th submittal documents accordingly, for example: 5_Plan_Set. Submit the following items to the PDSD Filedrop at https://www.tucsonaz.gov/file-upload-pdsd. In the Project Description field, please include the Activity Number. 1) Comment Response Letter (listing your response to reviewer's comments) 2) Complete Plan Set (all pages, full set) 3) Any other items requested by review staff Upon resubmittal, the plans will re-enter the standard 20-working-day review cycle. Thank you. Sharon Beasley, Permit Specialist City of Tucson Planning and Development Services Attn: Permit Counter/Payments 201 N. Stone Avenue, First Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/16/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |