Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP18-0037
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/20/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: El Sur Restaurant - (Food Service) Development Package (2nd Review) DP18-0037 - C-1 Zoning TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 20, 2018 DUE DATE: November 27, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 9, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) **** "Please address the follow up comments which are related to the previous zoning comments that were not addressed in its entirety or required additional follow up." Follow Up To Previous Comment 5: The previous comment will remain until the Board of Adjustment process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. The B of A case number must be listed as reference case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5: This project will require B of A approval for multiple code deficient regulations prior to approval of the DP. Once the B of A process has been completed the DP will have to be resubmitted for review. Typically the DP is revised to address all the reviewer's comments and the only comments that remain would be related to variance requests. Be sure to include as a general note the B of A case number, date of approval and conditions of approval on the cover sheet. List the B of A case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions Follow up To Previous Comment 10: The previous comment will remain until the PDMR process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: The current developments are considered non-conforming but due to a greater than 25% expansion in building area or restaurant use area and lot area the site will have to be brought into current UDC development regulations. Access onto the parking spaces that are fronting on the frontage road will have to be removed or approval through a Board of Adjustment variance application will be required. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: The previous comment will remain until the PDMR process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: The PAAL in the south parking lot does not appear that it will meet the minimum width of 24 feet. Once the required 4-foot concrete sidewalk adjacent to the building is provided the width of the PAAL will be less than 24 feet. A PDMR would be required to allow a PAAL width less than 24 feet. Follow Up To Previous Comment 13: The previous comment will remain until the Board of Adjustment process has been completed and the information added to the DP as a general note that includes the case number, date of approval modifications requested and approved and any conditions of approval. Also the Accessible parking space #12 detail does not match the site plan design. Revise as required. The Accessible parking space must have a 7-foot clearance from the finished sidewalk to the bottom of the smaller van accessible sign. Revise the detail as required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. PREVIOUS COMMENT 13: Revise the Accessible parking spaces details to match the proposed accessible parking areas on the site or revise the drawing to match the detail drawings. Because this s is a full code compliance review and the future roadway will be an issue for allowing the backing out of parked vehicles onto 22nd Street, a Board of Adjustment variance may be required. The variance may also be required to allow the continued direct access into a parking space from a major street. Follow Up To Previous Comment 18: The previous comment will remain until the there is a formal decision or determination related to the sign. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18: After discussion with Sign Code staff regarding the existing monument sign in the right of way, it was determined that the sign has not been permitted. The sign will have to be relocated and permitted or if the owner wishes to keep the sign in the current location the sign must not interfere with the sight visibility triangles and a temporary revocable easement must be obtained from the City of Tucson Real Estate Division. Contact Sign Staff at PDSD for additional information related to this item. For TRE information contact John Cahill 791-4181 with the City of Tucson Real Estate Division. In addition, the sign appears to pose a sight visibility safety issue. Refer to Engineering comments related to a SVT requirement at the corner of Jefferson and the south curb location of the frontage road. The remaining Zoning comments or follow up comments can be addressed on the next submittal after the Board of Adjustment process has been completed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/20/2018 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/23/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case numbers for reviews or modifications that affect the site. The following comments are relative to an application for a Board of Adjustment Variance (UDC 3.11.1). 7.6.2. APPLICABILITY Expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site. 7.6.4. LANDSCAPE STANDARDS Vehicular Use Areas The standards in this Section 7.6.4.B apply to all developments that provide more than four motor vehicle parking spaces. Canopy Trees in Vehicular Use Areas General Standards Within a vehicular use area, one canopy tree is required for each four motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Street Landscape Borders Minimum Width Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the street property line. Dimension street landscape border. One canopy tree is required for every 33 linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof, excluding vehicular ingress or egress points. Vegetative Ground Cover Fifty percent or more of the area of the street landscape border must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two years from the date of planting. 7.6.5. SCREENING STANDARDS When Required Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. A 30" screen is required to screen vehicle use area from Laguna St. A 5' wall is required to screen entire commercial developmentt from adjacent residential properties. Irrigation A water-conserving irrigation system is required for all new landscape plantings. For sites that are larger than one acre and on which the gross floor area of all buildings is more than 10,000 square feet, an underground irrigation system is required. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 11/27/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DP18-0037 1) Previous comment 12. Provide spacing between bollards. Show how vehicles using the driveway apron will not be able to access the northern side of the driveway apron. Provide a vehicle barrier such as a bollard or curb 2) Sheet 2. Keynote 13 is pointing to a small square within the proposed sidewalk. Relocate as needed 3) Proposed trash enclosure is directly beneath overhead lines. Provide coordination with utility providers, electric, communications etc. showing that the lines will be elevated the required 25' for service vehicle clearance 4) It is not clear how access to the proposed trash enclosure from the development will be provided. There appears to be approximately 2.5' between the water heater and the trash enclosure wall, this does not meet minimum standards 5) Sheets 1,2,3 and 4. Scale shown in title block does not match scale shown elsewhere on drawing sheet. Updated as needed 6) Cover sheet index indicates there are a total of 6 sheets. Only 5 sheets are provided. Update index or provide additional sheets 7) Sheet 3 Accessible Parking sign detail. Show that the minimum unobstructed vertical clearance of 84" is provided, dimension from grade to the lowest sign. Per City of Tucson (COT) Technical Standards Manual (TSM) section 7-01.4.3 8) Previous comments 4,5,6 and 13 will remain open until they are potentially addressed through a Technical Standards Modification Request process. Please revise the cover sheet indicating that these items would be addressed through a TSMR John Van Winkle, P.E. John.VanWinkle@tucsonaz.gov 520-837-5007 |
| 11/27/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Correct the note for sanitary manhole 9721-10 to show the east and west inverts of the sewer instead of three rim elevations. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2019 | SBEASLE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |