Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP18-0034
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/09/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 2. Cross-reference to: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 4.3 Streetscape Landscape Border - Maximum Width In situations where the street landscape border is wider than the minimum ten foot standard, the landscape border width needs to be determined for the purposes of calculating the 50% vegetative coverage standard. The width is that area between the required screen and the property line, unless there is permitted encroachment into the right-of-way as per this section. Portion of landscape buffer on Benson Hwy is greater than 10' wide. Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Provide screening for vehicle use area in Eastern portion of buffer along Missouri Street. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/09/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/13/2018 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | March 12, 2018 DP18-0034 2190 E Benson Highway 1. Identify the soil types for the project site in the drainage statement. 2. The location of the trapezoidal channel (I-97-27) doesn't seem to match the description in the drainage statement. Please confirm the location. The grading plan for the existing Ace Hardware doesn't include the trapezoidal channel. 3. Include a complete SWPPP with the next submittal. 4. The pedestrian path/crosswalk between the PAAL and building must have a vertical separation from the vehicle use area. (TSM 7-01.4.2.A) |
| 03/15/2018 | AHINES2 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 03/15/2018 | ALEXANDRA HINES | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: Alexandra Hines Lead Planner PROJECT: Commercial Storage Building at 2190 E Benson Hy Site/Grade/Swppp (1st Review) DP18-0034 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 15, 2018 DUE DATE: March 13, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings with a detailed response letter, which states how all zoning review comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Unified Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). UDC 3.3.3.G.5.c - An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan. AM 2-06 1. 2-06.3.5 - Remove Development Package PDSD approval stamp on all sheets. Reserve a three-inch by five-inch space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. The approval stamp will be applied electronically. 2. 2-06.4.2.B - Provide legal description per Assessor: PCL 200' X 275' ALONG SW BNDRY OF BENSON HWY 1554.75' E FROM CAMPBELL AVE 1.26 AC SEC 32-14-14. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package activity number, DP18-0034, on all sheets. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Note calculation of required and provided parking spaces for physically disabled. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Dimension the last stall and space before the trash enclosure to demonstrate compliance with minimum of 8.5 feet plus 1.5 feet for a total of 10 feet from vertical barrier of trash enclosure per UDC 7.4.6.D.2.b. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show loading for 1 Type A. There does not seem to be sufficient width in the PAAL. Show direct vehicular access to demonstrate no loading is needed per UDC 7.5.5. What are the other access points (i.e. rolling doors) in the building? What is the empty space on the site south of the building and west of the cell tower? 7. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide required sidewalk per TSM 7-01.4.3.C and physical separation for pedestrian access along vehicle travel lane per TSM 7-01.4.2.A. Or demonstrate no public access for TSM 7-01.4.1.H. 8. 2-06.4.9.W - General note 8 signifies proposed signs, please provide location of proposed sign. If desired, these zoning review comments can be reviewed during an appointment (in lieu of over the counter). Request a zoning review appointment in the message box during upload of the resubmittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact Alexandra Hines at (520) 837-6975 or alexandra.hines@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 03/19/2018 | JPEELDA1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/20/2018 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: Prepare a Comment Response Letter which tells the reviewer what changes have been made to the plan and what comments are addressed. When you have made the necessary corrections to the plans, please resubmit the following items to PDSD Filedrop: 1) Corrected plan set 2) Items requested by review staff Please remember to name your files appropriately, for example: second (2nd) submittal, 2_plan_set.pdf 2_swppp_report.pdf and the plans will re-enter the review cycle. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/10/2018 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/10/2018 | AHINES2 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |