Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP18-0029
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2018 | JVINCEN1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Dead end fire apparatus access road over 150' which requires a 120' hammerhead as an option. Your hammerhead does not meet the minimum 120'. Refer to IFC Appendix D, Table D103.4. Also need to note the location of no parking signs along the hammerhead. |
| 03/06/2018 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/06/2018 | MMORENO1 | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael Moreno PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Indian Ruins Medical Center Development Package (1st Review) DP17-0029 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2018 DUE DATE: February 2, 2018 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 2, 2019. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Please provide a title block per every sheet of development package. 2-06.3.5 - Please provide a consistent title block that includes per every sheet as noted by the standard above. 2. COMMENT: Please provide the three-inch by five-inch PDSD Stamp space per sheet 2 of the development package. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 3. COMMENT: Please provide a legend for the site plan drawing on the cover sheet or sheet 3. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 4. COMMENT: Development package sheet 3 should say 3 of 12. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP18-0029, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 6. COMMENT: Please provide the recorded documentation of the proposed cross access agreements easements for ingress egress access to the adjacent business to the east; and the shared parking agreement. The easements will have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 7. COMMENT: Add the street width per sheet 3 for Indian Ruins Road and correct the page number. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8. COMMENT: Provide documentation that the 8 parking spaces on the adjacent lot to be used for the new use are excess parking. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 9. COMMENT: All proposed and new signs will have to go through the permit process and will require a new permit. If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact Michael.Moreno@Tucson.az.gov at any time during the week. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 03/06/2018 | MMORENO1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/07/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Cross-reference to: Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior to landscape approval. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/07/2018 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/07/2018 | JOHN VAN WINKLE | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Will sign at counter once signature stamp has been provided on all sheets and all workflow comments have been addressed. John Van Winkle |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/15/2018 | QJONES1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |